Cited by 242Transportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Transport and AccessibilityTransportation and Mobility Innovations

Examining the Factors that Impact Public Transport Commuting Satisfaction

Open access
Cantwell, Mairead, Caulfield, Brian, O’Mahony, Margaret·2009·Journal of Public Transportation

Abstract

The first objective of this research was to examine the level of stress caused by commuting into Dublin city centre. The second objective was to determine the value placed on the comfort and reliability of public transport services. An on-line survey of workers who commute daily into Dublin city centre was conducted, which collected data on the respondents’ typical commute, commute-related stress, and socio-economic background. Commute satisfaction levels among public transport users were found to decrease for those who travel on crowded or unreliable services and those who have long wait-times. Stated preference scenarios relating to crowding and reliability were analysed using a multinomial logit model. The model showed that utility derived increases as crowding decreases and as reliability increases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5038/2375-0901.12.2.1

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [3]3. Central Statistics Office. 2007. Travel to work, school and college, Census 2006, Vol. 12 [on-line]. Retrieved 26/11/07 from http://www.cso.ie/census/cen- sus2006_volume_12.htm
  2. [7]7. DeSalle, B.R., and A.P. Tarko. 2003. Quality of highway safety information collec- tion with an internet-based survey tool (CD-ROM). 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January. Dublin Bus. 2006. Dublin bus network review. Dublin Bus, Ireland.
  3. [11]11. Hensher, D.A., J. Rose, and W. Green. 2005. Applied choice: A primer. Cambridge University Press.
  4. [12]12. King, P. 2006. Bus service evaluation. Final Year Dissertation, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin.
  5. [15]15. Nolan, G. 2007. Evaluation of public opinion of existing public transport services in Dublin. Final Year Dissertation, Department of Civil, Structural and Environ- mental Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin.
  6. [21]21. Witt, K. 1998. Best practices in interviewing via the internet. Proceedings of Saw- tooth Software Conference, Sawtooth Software, Inc., Sequim, Washington, pp. 15-37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cantwell, M., Caulfield, B., & O’Mahony, M.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
O’Mahony, Margaret
Venue
Journal of Public Transportation
Published
2009-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 1077-291X (ISSN-L)
  • 2375-0901
OpenAlex
W1972498214
Cited by
242
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Transportation (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Keywords
commuter satisfaction, crowding, service reliability, waiting time, stated preference, utility valuation, Dublin city centre, socioeconomic factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review