Cited by 18

The causal effect of bus rapid transit on changes in transit ridership

University of Washington, Stewart, Orion, Vernez Moudon, Anne, University of Washington, Saelens, Brian, University of Washington·2017·Journal of Public Transportation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5038/2375-0901.20.1.5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Change in residential density was used to approximate change in local demand for transit service.

    “Change in residential density (count of residential units per hectare) was used to approximate change in local demand for transit service (Stewart et al., 2017).”

    From Does improving stop amenities help increase Bus Rapid Transit ridership? Findings based on a quasi-experiment (2021) · cites this paper as Stewart et al., 2017

    The Methods section says the study used changes in the count of residential units within ¼ mile of transit stops to control for nearby development. The Discussion links increased residential density with increased demand for transit service. The paper does not describe the measure as residential units per hectare, so the cited claim's specified unit is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior research suggested that ridership increased overall in the E and F lines relative to the previously existing traditional bus service along these routes.

    “Prior research has suggested that ridership increased overall in the E and F lines relative to the previously existing traditional bus service along these routes (Stewart et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cervero R 1998 The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry Island Press Washington, DC
  2. Currie G Delbosc A 2013 Exploring Comparative Ridership Drivers of Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit Routes Journal of Public Transportation 16 47 65
  3. Deng T Nelson J 2011 Recent Developments in Bus Rapid Transit: A Review of the Literature Transport Reviews 31 1 69 96
  4. Handley MA Schillinger D Shiboski S 2011 Quasi-experimental Designs in Practice-based Research Settings: Design and Implementation Considerations Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 24 5 589 596 21900443
  5. Kittelson & Associates Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff, KFH Group, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, and Arup 2013 Chapter 4: Quality of Service Concepts Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual 3rd Transportation Research Board Washington, DC
  6. Locascio JJ Atri A 2011 An Overview of Longitudinal Data Analysis Methods for Neurological Research Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra 1 1 330 357 22203825 PMC3243635

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
University of Washington, Stewart, O., Vernez Moudon, A., University of Washington, Saelens, B., & University of Washington
Venue
Journal of Public Transportation
Published
2017-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
91-103
ISSN
  • 1077-291X
  • 2375-0901
Cited by
18
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review