The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neurodiversity Theory and Its Discontents: Autism, Schizophrenia, and the Social Model of Disability
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Proponents of the neurodiversity movement, on the other hand, maintain that autism (and other forms of neurocognitive differences like ADHD and dyslexia) are simply dimensions of the rich diversity of the human experience, characterized by a different means of experiencing, processing, understanding, and interacting with the world (Chapman, 2019).”
From Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Chapman, 2019
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–116 of 116
Ronaldo on the Clapham Omnibus: Complex Recoveries in Complex Psychosis
Whittle, H. J. (2025) · Culture Medicine and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-025-09931-6
Autism paradigms in a developing country setting: Results and implications of a Zimbabwean study
Mpofu, J., & Sefotho, M. M. (2025) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1638
Ethical navigations in participatory action research with students: reflections on a pilot study
Armstrong, M. A. (2025) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941251377269
Endorsement of the Neurodiversity Framework and Self-Esteem Among Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults
VanDaalen, R. A., & Liu, S. Y. (2025) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1177/25739581251398955 · Cited by 1
Dikmen, S., & Bahçeci, F. (2025) · e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.30900/kafkasegt.1581027
Heerden, R. V., & Naicker, V. (2026) · EUREKA Social and Humanities · doi:10.21303/2504-5571.2026.004141
Alexander, S. H. (2026) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.70175
van Till, S. A. L., Schermer, M., Bruining, H., Verhage, M., & Bunnik, E. M. (2026) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.70119
Sepúlveda, E. M., Lázaro, M., Pulido-García, N., & Benomar-Simou, H. (2026) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-026-09701-4
Bracken, R. C. (2026) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-026-10551-x
Asynchronous Social Communication Development in Autism: A Component-Level Analysis
Rollins, P. R., Patel, S. D., & Ulysse, C. (2026) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-026-07373-6
Muller-Kosmarov, C., & Chapman, R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197852668.003.0035
Self-citationNeoteny and Evolutionary Strategy: Reconsidering Developmental Arrest in the Axolotl and the Olm
Mussies, M. (2026) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/s10441-026-09535-6
Bury, S. M., Flower, R. L., Richardson, E. K., Phillips, D., Dwyer, P. S. R., & Spoor, J. R. (2026) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330261497307 · Cited by 2
Ashtikar, S. P., & Manoharan, G. (2026) · Neurodivergences · doi:10.62486/neuro2026290
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, R.
- Corresponding author
- Chapman, Robert
- Venue
- The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 371-390
- OpenAlex
- W2964791169
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- neurodiversity, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, social model of disability, disability theory, neurodiversity-affirmative approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
