The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neurodiversity Theory and Its Discontents: Autism, Schizophrenia, and the Social Model of Disability
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Proponents of the neurodiversity movement, on the other hand, maintain that autism (and other forms of neurocognitive differences like ADHD and dyslexia) are simply dimensions of the rich diversity of the human experience, characterized by a different means of experiencing, processing, understanding, and interacting with the world (Chapman, 2019).”
From Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Chapman, 2019
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Botha, M., Hanlon, J., & Williams, G. L. (2023) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w · Cited by 439
Neurodiversity and the social ecology of mental functions
Chapman, R. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620959833 · Cited by 267
Self-citationNeurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12456 · Cited by 231
Self-citationNeurodivergence-informed therapy
Chapman, R., & Botha, M. (2023) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15384 · Cited by 212
Self-citationNeurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm
(2020) · doi:10.4324/9780429322297 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, R.
- Corresponding author
- Chapman, Robert
- Venue
- The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 371-390
- OpenAlex
- W2964791169
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- neurodiversity, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, social model of disability, disability theory, neurodiversity-affirmative approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
