The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative study of long‐term psychological functioning in male survivors of stranger and acquaintance rape
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare psychological functioning in male rape survivors who had been raped either by strangers or acquaintances, and to test differences between the functioning of gay versus heterosexual survivors. Thirty-eight male rape survivors completed a range of measures relating to their perceptions about the nature of the effects of their assault, their general health, self-esteem and world assumptions. Results revealed that survivors of stranger rapes had lower psychological functioning overall than survivors of acquaintance rapes. Gay survivors were more likely to have crises about their sexual identity than heterosexual survivors. Suggestions for future work are proposed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the UK, only a limited number of studies have qualitatively examined the experiences of male survivors in the last 15 years.
“Such challenges seem to be heightened in the UK, where only a limited number of studies have qualitatively examined the experiences of male survivors in the last 15 years (Davies et al., 2010; Jamel et al., 2008).”
From “I Didn’t Feel I Was A Victim”: A Phenomenological Analysis of the Experiences of Male-on-male Survivors of Rape and Sexual Abuse (2022) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.
Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895 · Cited by 2,007
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1300/J082v07n02_15 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077559500005001004 · DOI
- Cohen J, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
- 10.1080/02674659608404443 · DOI
- Davies M, 2004, Forensic Update, 77, 15
- Davies M, 2001, Violence and Victims, 16, 607
- 10.1037/0021-843X.90.3.263 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-440X(81)90036-5 · DOI
- 10.1177/088626090005003010 · DOI
- Girelli SA, 1986, Violence and Victims, 1, 35, 10.1891/0886-6708.1.1.35 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033291700021644 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780140087010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113 · DOI
- Janoff-Bulman R, 1993, Shattered Assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma
- Kilpatrick DG, 1987, The Psychological Impact of Crime: A study of randomly surveyed crime victims. (Final report: Grant#84-JJ-CX-0039)
- Krahé B, 2000, T Eckes & HM Trautner (Eds) The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
- McMullen RJ, 1990, Male Rape: Breaking the silence on the last taboo
- 10.1017/S0033291700011168 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01543195 · DOI
- 10.1016/0037-7856(71)90091-6 · DOI
- Resick PA, 1997, RC Davis, AJ Lurigio & WG (Eds) Victims of Crime
- 10.1177/000276486029005003 · DOI
- 10.1016/0162-3095(90)90008-T · DOI
- Ullman SE, 1993, Violence and Victims, 7, 121, 10.1891/0886-6708.8.2.121 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10508-005-1001-0 · DOI
- 10.1348/014466505X52750 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Widanaralalage, B. K., Hine, B. A., Murphy, A. D., & Murji, K. (2022) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2022.2069898 · Cited by 68
“Such challenges seem to be heightened in the UK, where only a limited number of studies have qualitatively examined the experiences of male survivors in the last 15 years (Davies et al., 2010; Jamel et al., 2008).”
BackgroundWidanaralalage, B. K., Jennings, S., Dando, C., & Mackenzie, J.-M. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241246217 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Davies, M., Walker, J., Archer, J., & Pollard, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Lancashire (GB)
- ORCID
- Archer, John
- Venue
- Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-09-30
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 25-33
- ISSN
- 1759-6599 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980726275
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research (publishedVersion)
- UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- stranger rape, acquaintance rape, sexual assault, psychological functioning, self-esteem, world assumptions, health perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
