Cited by 20Multilingual Education and PolicyTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEarly Childhood Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond professional development: Factors influencing early childhood educators’ beliefs and practices working with dual language learners

Open access

Abstract

The National Association for the Education of Young Children and Head Start have clearly articulated their position on the provision of high-quality instruction for the 4 million dual language learners (DLLs) enrolled in early childhood (EC) programs nationwide. Professional development (PD) provides a way for educators to increase their knowledge and skills; however, teacher practices in the classroom are strongly influenced by implicit beliefs about how children learn. This study examined the influence of 6 PD sessions related to high-quality instruction for DLLs and examined other influential factors related to beliefs and practices. Participants were 98 early childhood educators serving 3- and 4-year-old DLLs in an urban area in the Southwest US. Quantitative findings indicate educators’ beliefs and practices shifted after PD. Qualitative findings suggest that educators’ empathy, expectations, and external factors also influenced their beliefs and practices. Implications for PD and program design are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5070/b5.36008

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Athos, A. G., & Gabarro, J. J. (1978). The individual frame of refer- ence. In A. G. Athos & J. J. Gabarro (Eds.), Interpersonal behav- ior: Communications and understanding in relationships (pp. 137- 148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. Brancard, R., & Quinwilliams, J. (2012). Learning labs: Collaborations for transformative teacher learning. TESOL Journal, 3, 320-349.
  3. Buysse, V., Castro, D. C., West, T., & Skinner, M. (2005). Addressing the needs of Latino children: A national survey of state admin- istrators of early childhood programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 146-163.
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
  5. García, E. E., & Frede, E. C. (Eds.). (2010). Young English language learners: Current research and emerging directions for practice and policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  6. Goldenberg, C., Hicks, J., & Lit, I. (2013). Dual language learners: Ef- fective instruction in early childhood. American Educator, 37(2), 26-29.
  7. Hardin, B. J., Lower, J. K., Smallwood, G. R., Chakravarthi. S., Li, L., & Jordan, C. (2010). Teachers, families, and communities support- ing English language learners in inclusive pre-kindergartens: An 46 • The CATESOL Journal 29.1 • 2017 evaluation of a professional development model. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 31, 20-36.
  8. Hart, J. E., & Lee, O. (2003). Teacher professional development to im- prove the science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 475-501.
  9. Magruder, E. S., Hayslip, W. W., Espinosa, L. M., & Matera, C. (2013). Many languages, one teacher: Supporting language and literacy development for preschool dual language learners. Young Chil- dren, 68(1), 8-12.
  10. Milburn, T., Hipfner-Boucher, K., Weitzman, E., Greenberg, J., Pelle- tier, J., & Girolametto, L. (2015). Effects of coaching on educators' and preschoolers' use of code-related talk during a small group craft/writing activity. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46, 94-111. The CATESOL Journal 29.1 • 2017 • 47
  11. Namasivayam, A., Hipfner-Boucher, K., Milburn, T., Weitzman, E., Greenburg, J., Pelletier, J., & Girolametto, L. (2015). Effects of coaching on educators' vocabulary-teaching strategies during shared reading. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathol- ogy, 17(4), 346-356.
  12. Nelson, R. F. (2000). Personal and environmental factors that influ- ence early childhood teachers' practices. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27, 95-103.
  13. Neuman, S. B., & Wright, T. S. (2010). Promoting language and litera- cy development for early childhood educators: A mixed-methods study of coursework and coaching. Elementary School Journal, 111, 63-86.
  14. Parajes, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
  15. Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers' beliefs. In J. Rath & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Advances in teacher education series, 6 (pp. 1-22). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  16. Thomas, E. E., Bell, D. L., Spelman, M., & Briody, J. (2015). The growth of instructional coaching partner conversations in a pre-K-3rd grade teacher professional development experience. Journal of Adult Education, 44, 1-6.
  17. Worthington, E., Maude, S., Hughes, K., Luze, G., Peterson, C., Broth- erson, M., Bruna, K., & Luchtel, M. (2011). A qualitative exami- nation of the challenges, resources, and strategies for serving chil- dren learning English in Head Start. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(1), 51-60.
  18. Zaslow, M., Tout, K., Halle, T., Whittaker, J. V., & Lavelle, B. (2010). 48 • The CATESOL Journal 29.1 • 2017 Toward the identification of features of effective professional de- velopment for early childhood educators: Literature review. Wash- ington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service (ED-04-CO-0038/0002). Retrieved from http://www.eric .ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED527140
  19. Zehler, A. M., Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Stephenson, T. G., Pendzick, M. L., & Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities (Vol. 1: Research Report). Submitted to Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Edu- cation, Office of English Language Acquisition.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Spies, T. G., Lyons, C., Huerta, M., Garza, T., & Reding, C.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Venue
The CATESOL Journal
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
ISSN
1535-0517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774092600
Cited by
20
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The CATESOL journal. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
dual language learners, early childhood educators, teacher beliefs, teacher practices, professional development, empathy, teacher expectations, early childhood programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review