The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 34 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Open accessAbstract
No abstract
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
18 Sources not found · 7 Own interpretation
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This chauvinism has lead to a backlash where either e xplicitly or implicitly through their behavior --Black women and other women of color have refused to join them.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“None of the writers previously alluded to --Hooks, Davis or Joseph --denies the existence of racism and elitism within the contemporary feminist movement.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Each further refutes the reductionist analysis that combatting racism alone, will mean that Black women will then ipso facto become liberated.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 12
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only after the recognition of common differences ~s acknowledged and the diversity of women's condition is made central to the feminist framework, can the feminist movement move forward.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Hooks contends that if feminists are to succeed in creating a viable mass movement against sexual oppression , it must account for the complexity and diversity of female experience and cease catering to the needs of a privileged few.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, she comments that “It was a mark of race and class privilege, as well as the expression of treedom from many constraints of sexism placed upon working class women, that middle-class white women were able to make their interests the primary focus of the feminist movement and employ a rhetoric of commo~lity that made their condition synonymous with oppression .””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“She be9ins her discussion with a critique of the contemporary feminist movement that asserts that “Feminism in the u.s. has never emerged from the women who are the most victimized by sexist oppression; women who arE' daily beaten down, mentally, physically and spiritually --women who are powerless to change thei~ condition in life: all non-white women and poor women.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“From Margin to Center, a leading work in an emergent body-of literature written by Black feminists, clearly delineates the nexus of race, class and sexual oppression upon the lives of Black women.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Hooks' new book speaks directly to major contradictions within the feminist movement in the United States: Eurocentrism, elitism, opportunism, romaniticism of sisterhood, and a false consciousness which targets men as the enemy and deflects attention from an economic system based upon exploitation, racism and sexual discrimination.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A viable feminist framework must acknowledge that “women are divided by sexist attitudes, racism, class privilege , and a host of other I prejudices” which have 3 precluded their coming together and organizing effectively .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Bell Hooks' earlier work, Ain't I a W oman: Black Wome and Feminism (1981); Gloria I .Joseph and Jill Lewis', Commo Differences (1981); and Angela Y. Davis', Women, Rac-;;-a:n Class (1983), collectively provide a rationale for Blac ;o;nen' s necessRry participation in the feminist movement o our own terms .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Furthermore, these authors do however, contradict the notion that the feminist movement belongs to white women (middle-class white women at that), and challenge the 1.dea that Black women do not have legitimate concerns related to gender and exploitation.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Together, these works hav~ explored ou multifaceted history and its various permutations: the impac of racism on Black women during slavery, the devaluation of Black womanhood, racism within the contemporary feminist movement, the relationship between mothers and daughters, sexual atitudes and sexuality, housework, birth control and struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Women who were not opposed to patriarchy, capitalism, classism or racism, labeled themselves feminists; yet these women claimed sisterhood with the very women they sought to silence and exclude from the struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Hooks, Davis and Joseph see Black women 's feminist concerns as undeniable and they speak in direct contrast to Black and African women (and men) who preoccupied by reactions to racism, cast aspersions and espouse the belief that ... Black American and African women should beware of the term 'feminism ' which is suspect, negative and usually associated with middle-class white American women who (e”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To transform feminism and raise it fron this quagmire, Hooks suggests that feminism be define( clearly, as a movement to end sexist oppression as well a1 other forms of oppression and domination --not as a movemen1 promotinq a life-style choice or as gaining equality with me1 within an oppressive and exploitative system.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, they express repugnance for its tenacious grip on the movement and its alienation of women of color.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In her conclusion, Roods enjoins women and men to support feminism and to restore its revolutionary life force by “rethinking and reshaping its direction so that the experiences of people on the margin who suffer sexist oppression and other forms of group oppression are understood, addressed and incor~rated into the making of theory and the planning of action.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.161
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the movement's stagnation and isolation form the very forces who could have galvanized feminism into a legitimate masf based organization .”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“she pulls together the various strands and argues effectively for an analysis which acknowledges the interdependence of race, sex and class and the necessity of fighting them through a combined and multi-pronged strategy .”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, our struggle is defined as one against the combined forces of racial, sexual , and class oppression.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“women are not a monolithj group; there is diversity , there is conflict, and there are differences in spite of the commonality of gender.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hooks s killfully sidesteps the Marxist orthodxy of myoptically focusing on class to the exclusion of all else ; she transcends the nationalist thinking of defining race as the sole barrier ; and she refuses to be seduced by the lure of sisterhood with women who have coopted feminism and appropriated it as a vehicle for their own self-serving needs.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A. nd, men too, are not allowed to abdicate their obligation to struggle with women in bringing about an end to exploitation based upon race, class and sex .”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Black women and other women of color are addressed and identified as principal characters in the struggle against sexism; they are brought front stage , center, no longer relegated to the wings.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women are no longer silent and have entered the arena of debate and done their homework.
“Black women o.1re no longer silent.We have entered the arena of debate and we have done our homework.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have begun to express compassion for themselves and to assess their own particular condition as women and as members of an oppressed ethnic group.
“As Black women we have begun tc express compassion for ourselves .We have begun to assess out own particular condition as women and as members of ar oppressed ethnic group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have dared to become advocates of feminism within an Afrocentric context.
“We have even dared to becomE advocates of feminism that 1s within an Afrocentri< context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have done this in spite of resistance and incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deem feminism an inappropriate topic for them.
“We have done this in spite of resistance an< incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deer feminism an inappropriate topic for us.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In increasing numbers, Black women's novels, poems, and expository works attest to their understanding that sexism is a barrier they must organize to eradicate.
“In increasing numbers our novels, poems and expository works attest to ou understanding that sexism is indeed a barrier which we mus organize to eradicate .”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,201–4,300 of 4,457
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059639-001
Barnes, B. A. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosf035.pub3
Crafting a Postcritical Compass
Anders, A. D. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58827-3_10
Be of Good Use: Exploring the Intersection of Critical Race Theory and Postcritical Ethnography
Cook, D. A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58827-3_4
Grassroots Activism Impacting Rural LGBTQIA+ Communities
Timbers, V. L., Ward, W. P., & Ballard, S. J. (2024) · Advances in Social Work · doi:10.18060/26373
Mysticism and Black feminist resistance in the Vida of Úrsula de Jesús
Styles, M. (2024) · Colonial Latin American Review · doi:10.1080/10609164.2024.2350864
Structural Violence Is Not Fate
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.003.0006
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.002.0009
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.003.0001
Structural Violence Is Profit-Driven
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.003.0004
Structural Violence Is by Design
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.003.0005
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.002.0004
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.002.0005
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.002.0003
Structural Violence Is Historical
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.003.0003
Ruíz, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197634028.002.0008
Mitra-Sarkar, S., Admire, A., & Pfende, K. C. (2024) · Developments in environmental science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21948-1.00030-3
Wenk, A. F. (2024) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2024.2380015
Knight, M., Ferguson, R. N., & Reece, R. (2024) · doi:10.32920/26504173.v1
Knight, M., Ferguson, R. N., & Reece, R. (2024) · doi:10.32920/26504173
Making Sanctuary: An Exploration of Women's Empowerment Through WomenOverseas
Luo, Y. (2024) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16132
bell hooks: Exploring Intersectionality, Black Feminist Thinking & Radical Love
Morris-Coker, C. B. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25134-4_155
Ngcobo, S., & van der Walt, C. (2024) · Sacrilegens · doi:10.34019/2237-6151.2024.v21.45140
Becoming a Homemaker in Appalachia: Building Bridges in Women's Flat Track Roller Derby
Lough, J. L. (2024) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.12592
Muntlig historia som feministisk forskningsmetod
Linderoth, K. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c632
Dokumentanalys i feministiska studier
Kolankiewicz, M. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c636
Pinto, A. B. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c635
Kreativt skrivande som feministiskt frigörelseprojekt
Dahl, U. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c624
Wallin, L. A. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c633
Kauko, S. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c625
Phoenix, A. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c638
Schmitt, I. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c619
Tidigare forskning i relation till forskningsfokus och analys
Rönnback, J. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c622
Feministisk aktions- och aktivistforskning
Söderman, E. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c630
Konsten att analysera en känsla
Eriksson, M. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c641
Kolankiewicz, M., Liinason, M., & Sager, M. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c616
Zhang, B., Park, G., Chang, B., & Du, W. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440858
Liinason, M. (2024) · Nordic Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.37852/oblu.260.c620
Revisiting the womanist-feminist continuum in Sefi Atta’s Everything Good Will Come
Bailey, C. Y. (2024) · Literature, critique, and empire today. · doi:10.1177/30333962241269776
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060024-007
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060024-008
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060024-006
INTRODUCTION: OTHERING REPRODUCTION
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060024-001
INVESTING IN THE CURATIVE IMAGINARY
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060024-004
CHILDREN AS HUMAN CAPITAL, REPRODUCTIVE LABOR, AND THE LOGIC OF SELF-ENTREPRENEURIALISM
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060024-003
NEOLIBERAL EUGENICS AS THE FERTILITY FRONTIER OF BIOCAPITAL
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060024-005
1 Contextualizing the aggrandizement of innovation
Denbow, J. (2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060024-002
Reflections—This Ain’t Yo Laboratory: Racism, Research, and an Attempt to Center Home
Bradford, N. J. (2024) · American Public Health Association eBooks · doi:10.2105/9780875533537sec1_1
Akré, E.-R. L. (2024) · American Public Health Association eBooks · doi:10.2105/9780875533537ch10
The enemy is inside: Feminists of color navigate the nonprofit industrial complex
Birk, M. (2024) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.13205
Tahir, M. W., & Finlay, G. (2024) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2024.2411000
Being and Becoming in a Time of Crisis
Baker, A. M. (2024) · Studies in childhood and youth · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69296-3_2
Trusting One Another as We Move Forward Collaboratively for Transformed Teaching Praxis
Jarvis, J., Lindhardt, E. M., Mthiyane, N. P., & Ruus, O. C. (2024) · Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.59915/jes.2024.23.1.4
COVID-19 and Gendered Risk: A Case Study of Yemeni Women Peacebuilders
Al-Thaibani, K. (2024) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viae041.2
Analyzing How Different Platforms Shape Political Expression
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.003.0002
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.002.0004
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.003.0006
And I’m Always Winning Like I’m Donald Trump”
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.003.0003
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.002.0005
Advance praise for Not Your Parents’ Politics
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.002.0007
“It’s Not You and Your Biodegradable Toothbrush against the World”
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.003.0005
“Happy Heavenly Birthday, Beautiful Queen”
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.003.0004
Factors Influencing Glass Ceiling
Rana, S. U. A. (2024) · Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6641-4.ch010
Social Justice and Equity in Early Childhood Education
Menon, N. (2024) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47411-8_14-1
Wang, T., & Dollar, C. B. (2024) · Women & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/08974454.2024.2422863
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-008
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-004
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-006
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-009
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-001
SORROW, AESTHETIC UNSETTLEMENT, AND SONIC RUPTURE IN THE MEXICO-US BORDERLANDS
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-005
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-007
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-003
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478060246-002
Lown, J., Chiavelli, S., & Collier, K. M. (2024) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/08861099241293415
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0006
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0016
The Social and Political Irrelevance of Work
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0009
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0001
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0013
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0015
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0012
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0005
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0014
The Imminent Obsolescence of Work
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0008
Feminism’s Ambivalent Attitude to Work
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0010
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0007
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0002
The Work of Social Reproduction
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0011
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.003.0004
Deranty, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192887146.002.0003
Sijilmassi, N. (2024) · Babel Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción · doi:10.1075/babel.24155.sij
Dislocating West-centric feminist-queer politics from Bengal: Bhawaiya and the sexual subaltern
Khandoker, N. (2024) · International Feminist Journal of Politics · doi:10.1080/14616742.2024.2420672
Jesuit Spirituality for the Contemporary Pluralistic Classroom
Dickinson, C. (2024) · Teaching Theology & Religion · doi:10.1111/teth.12682
Immigrant Women’s Entrepreneurship: Renewing Forms of Support to Enhance Impact
Saba, T., & Johnson, J.-A. (2024) · Palgrave studies in equity, diversity, inclusion, and indigenization in business · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69642-8_11
Educating Otherwise: Transformative Potenziale der Designausbildung
Bakry, M. E., Ober, M., & Pregger, L. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-44988-9_13
Romanis, E. C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191986574.003.0005
Romanis, E. C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191986574.003.0006
Romanis, E. C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191986574.003.0004
Romanis, E. C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191986574.003.0007
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, S.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Sandra
- Venue
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0041-5715 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-5802
- OpenAlex
- W299429925
- Cited by
- 4,441
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 256 · 2024: 474 · 2023: 392 · 2022: 393 · 2021: 325 · 2020: 258 · 2019: 248 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- feminist theory, marginality, women's studies, African feminism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
