The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 34 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Open accessAbstract
No abstract
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
18 Sources not found · 7 Own interpretation
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This chauvinism has lead to a backlash where either e xplicitly or implicitly through their behavior --Black women and other women of color have refused to join them.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“None of the writers previously alluded to --Hooks, Davis or Joseph --denies the existence of racism and elitism within the contemporary feminist movement.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Each further refutes the reductionist analysis that combatting racism alone, will mean that Black women will then ipso facto become liberated.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 12
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only after the recognition of common differences ~s acknowledged and the diversity of women's condition is made central to the feminist framework, can the feminist movement move forward.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Hooks contends that if feminists are to succeed in creating a viable mass movement against sexual oppression , it must account for the complexity and diversity of female experience and cease catering to the needs of a privileged few.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, she comments that “It was a mark of race and class privilege, as well as the expression of treedom from many constraints of sexism placed upon working class women, that middle-class white women were able to make their interests the primary focus of the feminist movement and employ a rhetoric of commo~lity that made their condition synonymous with oppression .””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“She be9ins her discussion with a critique of the contemporary feminist movement that asserts that “Feminism in the u.s. has never emerged from the women who are the most victimized by sexist oppression; women who arE' daily beaten down, mentally, physically and spiritually --women who are powerless to change thei~ condition in life: all non-white women and poor women.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“From Margin to Center, a leading work in an emergent body-of literature written by Black feminists, clearly delineates the nexus of race, class and sexual oppression upon the lives of Black women.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Hooks' new book speaks directly to major contradictions within the feminist movement in the United States: Eurocentrism, elitism, opportunism, romaniticism of sisterhood, and a false consciousness which targets men as the enemy and deflects attention from an economic system based upon exploitation, racism and sexual discrimination.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A viable feminist framework must acknowledge that “women are divided by sexist attitudes, racism, class privilege , and a host of other I prejudices” which have 3 precluded their coming together and organizing effectively .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Bell Hooks' earlier work, Ain't I a W oman: Black Wome and Feminism (1981); Gloria I .Joseph and Jill Lewis', Commo Differences (1981); and Angela Y. Davis', Women, Rac-;;-a:n Class (1983), collectively provide a rationale for Blac ;o;nen' s necessRry participation in the feminist movement o our own terms .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Furthermore, these authors do however, contradict the notion that the feminist movement belongs to white women (middle-class white women at that), and challenge the 1.dea that Black women do not have legitimate concerns related to gender and exploitation.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Together, these works hav~ explored ou multifaceted history and its various permutations: the impac of racism on Black women during slavery, the devaluation of Black womanhood, racism within the contemporary feminist movement, the relationship between mothers and daughters, sexual atitudes and sexuality, housework, birth control and struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Women who were not opposed to patriarchy, capitalism, classism or racism, labeled themselves feminists; yet these women claimed sisterhood with the very women they sought to silence and exclude from the struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Hooks, Davis and Joseph see Black women 's feminist concerns as undeniable and they speak in direct contrast to Black and African women (and men) who preoccupied by reactions to racism, cast aspersions and espouse the belief that ... Black American and African women should beware of the term 'feminism ' which is suspect, negative and usually associated with middle-class white American women who (e”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To transform feminism and raise it fron this quagmire, Hooks suggests that feminism be define( clearly, as a movement to end sexist oppression as well a1 other forms of oppression and domination --not as a movemen1 promotinq a life-style choice or as gaining equality with me1 within an oppressive and exploitative system.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, they express repugnance for its tenacious grip on the movement and its alienation of women of color.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In her conclusion, Roods enjoins women and men to support feminism and to restore its revolutionary life force by “rethinking and reshaping its direction so that the experiences of people on the margin who suffer sexist oppression and other forms of group oppression are understood, addressed and incor~rated into the making of theory and the planning of action.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.161
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the movement's stagnation and isolation form the very forces who could have galvanized feminism into a legitimate masf based organization .”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“she pulls together the various strands and argues effectively for an analysis which acknowledges the interdependence of race, sex and class and the necessity of fighting them through a combined and multi-pronged strategy .”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, our struggle is defined as one against the combined forces of racial, sexual , and class oppression.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“women are not a monolithj group; there is diversity , there is conflict, and there are differences in spite of the commonality of gender.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hooks s killfully sidesteps the Marxist orthodxy of myoptically focusing on class to the exclusion of all else ; she transcends the nationalist thinking of defining race as the sole barrier ; and she refuses to be seduced by the lure of sisterhood with women who have coopted feminism and appropriated it as a vehicle for their own self-serving needs.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A. nd, men too, are not allowed to abdicate their obligation to struggle with women in bringing about an end to exploitation based upon race, class and sex .”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Black women and other women of color are addressed and identified as principal characters in the struggle against sexism; they are brought front stage , center, no longer relegated to the wings.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women are no longer silent and have entered the arena of debate and done their homework.
“Black women o.1re no longer silent.We have entered the arena of debate and we have done our homework.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have begun to express compassion for themselves and to assess their own particular condition as women and as members of an oppressed ethnic group.
“As Black women we have begun tc express compassion for ourselves .We have begun to assess out own particular condition as women and as members of ar oppressed ethnic group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have dared to become advocates of feminism within an Afrocentric context.
“We have even dared to becomE advocates of feminism that 1s within an Afrocentri< context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have done this in spite of resistance and incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deem feminism an inappropriate topic for them.
“We have done this in spite of resistance an< incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deer feminism an inappropriate topic for us.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In increasing numbers, Black women's novels, poems, and expository works attest to their understanding that sexism is a barrier they must organize to eradicate.
“In increasing numbers our novels, poems and expository works attest to ou understanding that sexism is indeed a barrier which we mus organize to eradicate .”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243205278639 · Cited by 9,367
Acker, J. R. (2006) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243206289499 · Cited by 3,858
Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x · Cited by 1,698
Foundations of Place: A Multidisciplinary Framework for Place-Conscious Education
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040003619 · Cited by 1,280
Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography*
Valentine, G. (2007) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,250
Alcoff, L. M. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0195137345.001.0001 · Cited by 1,150
Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1
Lazar, M. M. (2007) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405900701464816 · Cited by 1,139
Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions
Cerulo, K. A. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.385 · Cited by 1,002
The Color of Supremacy: Beyond the discourse of ‘white privilege’
Leonardo, Z. (2004) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00057.x · Cited by 904
Daly, K., & Chesney‐Lind, M. (1988) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418828800089871 · Cited by 893
Intersections: The Simultaneity of Race, Gender and Class in Organization Studies
Holvino, E. (2008) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00400.x · Cited by 809
Whiteness: A strategic rhetoric
Nakayama, T. K., & Krizek, R. L. (1995) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335639509384117 · Cited by 763
Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V. N., & McIlwain, C. D. (2018) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy003 · Cited by 720
Nightingale, A. J. (2010) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004 · Cited by 711
Ely, R. J., & MEYERSON, D. E. (2000) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22004-2 · Cited by 656
Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric
Foss, S. K., & Griffin, C. L. (1995) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759509376345 · Cited by 608
A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century
Haraway, D. (2000) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-05194-3_10 · Cited by 582
Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S., Sánchez‐Peña, M. L., & Svyantek, M. (2021) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20377 · Cited by 557
Masculinidade hegemônica: repensando o conceito
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2013) · Revista Estudos Feministas · doi:10.1590/s0104-026x2013000100014 · Cited by 548
The Nature of Gender: Work, Gender, and Environment
Nightingale, A. J. (2006) · Environment and Planning D Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d01k · Cited by 534
Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2008) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20269 · Cited by 522
Feminist Approaches to Social Science: Epistemological and Methodological Tenets
Campbell, R., & Wasco, S. M. (2000) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1005159716099 · Cited by 521
A Wake-Up Call: Equity, Inequality and Covid-19 Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning
Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D. Z., Chambers, T., Chili, M. M., de Villiers, M., Felix, A., Gachago, D., Gokhale, C., et al. (2020) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4 · Cited by 516
You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists
Tickner, J. A. (1997) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-2478.00060 · Cited by 504
A Model for Diverse Learning Environments
Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M. G., & Arellano, L. (2012) · Higher education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2950-6_2 · Cited by 500
Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life
Beebeejaun, Y. (2016) · Journal of Urban Affairs · doi:10.1080/07352166.2016.1255526 · Cited by 492
Work–Life, Diversity and Intersectionality: A Critical Review and Research Agenda
Özbilgin, M. F., Beauregard, T. A., Tatlι, A., & Bell, M. P. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00291.x · Cited by 483
Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism
Narayan, U. (1998) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01227.x · Cited by 474
From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research
Hall, B. L. (1992) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/bf02691928 · Cited by 471
Paxton, P. M., Kunovich, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131651 · Cited by 463
Comstock, D. L., Hammer, T. R., Strentzsch, J. A., Cannon, K. B., Parsons, J., & Salazar, G. (2008) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00510.x · Cited by 448
Rethinking sexualities in Africa
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4336 · Cited by 424
Messing with gender in feminist political ecology
Mollett, S., & Faria, C. (2012) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.009 · Cited by 423
Research, Teaching, and Service: Why Shouldn't Women's Work Count?
Park, S. M. (1996) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1996.11780249 · Cited by 419
Duffy, M. (2007) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243207300764 · Cited by 416
Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited
Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2014) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.924966 · Cited by 412
Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression
Gilson, E. C. (2010) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01158.x · Cited by 409
Brosius, J. P. (1999) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.2307/2991397 · Cited by 407
Regimes of Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research: The Rigors of Reciprocity
Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L., & Morton, M. (2001) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780040100700305 · Cited by 403
Mott, C., & Cockayne, D. (2017) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2017.1339022 · Cited by 385
An Emic Approach to Intersectional Study of Diversity at Work: A Bourdieuan Framing
Tatlι, A., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2011) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00326.x · Cited by 382
Few, A. L. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosb028 · Cited by 373
Dimensions of Everyday Resistance: An Analytical Framework
Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2014) · Critical Sociology · doi:10.1177/0896920514524604 · Cited by 369
Searching for wages and mothering from Afar: The case of Honduran transnational families
Schmalzbauer, L. (2004) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00095.x · Cited by 366
OVERCOMING PATRIARCHAL CONSTRAINTS:
Hondagneu‐Sotelo, P. (1992) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124392006003004 · Cited by 364
Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis
Lister, R. (1997) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1080/014177897339641 · Cited by 363
The Theory and Praxis of Intersectionality in Work and Organisations: Where Do We Go From Here?
Rodríguez, J. K., Holvino, E., Fletcher, J. K., & Nkomo, S. M. (2016) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12131 · Cited by 345
Regarding Gender: Essentialism, Constructionism, and Feminist Psychology
Bohan, J. S. (1993) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00673.x · Cited by 340
Sadowski, J. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12240.001.0001 · Cited by 340
Bodies (and Spaces) do Matter: The limits of performativity
Nelson, L. (1999) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/09663699924926 · Cited by 336
Being Lovingly, Knowingly Ignorant: White Feminism and Women of Color
Ortega, M. (2006) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01113.x · Cited by 323
Conceptualizing Resistance: Women's Leisure as Political Practice
Shaw, S. M. (2001) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.2001.11949937 · Cited by 315
The Time- and Context-Contingent Nature of Intersectionality and Interlocking Oppressions
Hulko, W. (2008) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/0886109908326814 · Cited by 308
First Nations Women’s Encounters with Mainstream Health Care Services
Browne, A. J., & Fiske, J. (2001) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/019394590102300203 · Cited by 292
Simien, E. M. (2005) · Journal of Black Studies · doi:10.1177/0021934704265899 · Cited by 283
Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory
Bacchi, C. L., & Eveline, J. (2009) · University of Adelaide Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/upo9780980672381 · Cited by 281
Digital Storytelling as a Signature Pedagogy for the New Humanities
Benmayor, R. (2008) · Arts and Humanities in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1474022208088648 · Cited by 280
Lazar, M. M. (2005) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230599901_1 · Cited by 280
Morris, E. W., & Perry, B. L. (2017) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/0038040717694876 · Cited by 278
Redefining Hijab: American Muslim Women's Standpoints on Veiling
Droogsma, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909880701434299 · Cited by 274
Few, A. L., Stephens, D. P., & Rouse-Arnett, M. (2003) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00205.x · Cited by 272
Toward a Continuum of Intersectionality Theorizing for Feminist Social Work Scholarship
Mehrotra, G. R. (2010) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/0886109910384190 · Cited by 264
BOS, A. L., GREENLEE, J. S., HOLMAN, M. R., OXLEY, Z. M., & LAY, J. C. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421001027 · Cited by 250
Resisting the Canon: Feminist Cultural Studies, Sport, and Technologies of the Body
Cole, C. L. (1993) · Journal of Sport and Social Issues · doi:10.1177/019372359301700202 · Cited by 249
Special Section: Anthropology of White Supremacy
Jesús, A. M. B., & Pierre, J. (2019) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13351 · Cited by 247
HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers
Light, A. (2011) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.02.002 · Cited by 246
Second-Wave White Teacher Identity Studies
Jupp, J., Berry, T. R., & Lensmire, T. J. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316629798 · Cited by 246
Histories of Feminist Ethnography
Visweswaran, K. (1997) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.591 · Cited by 245
The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two US cities
Kvasny, L., & Keil, M. (2005) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00207.x · Cited by 241
Intersectionality, migration and development
Bastia, T. (2014) · Progress in Development Studies · doi:10.1177/1464993414521330 · Cited by 239
Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Models
Cheng, M., Durmus, E., & Jurafsky, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.84 · Cited by 235
Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology
Conkey, M. W., & Gero, J. M. (1997) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411 · Cited by 234
Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M. E., & Louis, W. R. (2016) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12168 · Cited by 233
Davis, D. R., & Maldonado, C. (2017) · Advancing Women in Leadership Journal · doi:10.21423/awlj-v35.a125 · Cited by 231
Integrating Black Consciousness and Critical Race Feminism Into Family Studies Research
Few, A. L. (2007) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x06297330 · Cited by 220
Toward a unified theory of class, race, and gender
SACKS, K. B. (1989) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1989.16.3.02a00080 · Cited by 218
Osmond, M. W., & Thorne, B. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_23 · Cited by 218
The Philosophy and Politics of Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research
Amis, J., & Silk, M. (2007) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428107300341 · Cited by 214
“Abomination”—Life as a Bible Belt Gay
Barton, B. (2010) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918361003608558 · Cited by 213
A Gender Agenda: New Directions for Planning Theory
Sandercock, L., & Forsyth, A. (1992) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944369208975534 · Cited by 212
Political ecology 1: From margins to center
Sultana, F. (2020) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132520936751 · Cited by 212
Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm
(2020) · doi:10.4324/9780429322297 · Cited by 211
Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis
Lazar, M. M. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118584248.ch9 · Cited by 208
CONTRADICTIONS OF FEMINIST METHODOLOGY
Gorelick, S. (1991) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124391005004002 · Cited by 206
The Racial Foundation of Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., & Allen, B. J. (2003) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00280.x · Cited by 205
THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHICANA FEMINIST DISCOURSE, 1970-1980
GARCIA, A. M. (1989) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124389003002004 · Cited by 203
Naples, N. A. (1992) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124392006003006 · Cited by 203
Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism
Schlosberg, D. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199256411.001.0001 · Cited by 203
Developing a Scale to Measure the Diversity of Feminist Attitudes
Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O'Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00158.x · Cited by 203
Psychotherapy, Classism, and the Poor: Conspicuous by Their Absence.
Smith, L. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.7.687 · Cited by 203
Against Marriage and Motherhood
Card, C. (1996) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01013.x · Cited by 200
What Have the Feminists Done for Us? Feminist Theory and Organizational Resistance
Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508405055945 · Cited by 199
Hegemonic Heteronormativity: Toward a New Era of Queer Family Theory
Allen, S. H., & Mendez, S. N. (2018) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/jftr.12241 · Cited by 199
Few‐Demo, A. L., & Glass, V. Q. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118663202.wberen390 · Cited by 192
Research, Teaching, and Service: Why Shouldn't Women's Work Count?
Park, S. M. (1996) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/2943903 · Cited by 192
Heynen, N. (2009) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045600802683767 · Cited by 190
Incorporating intersectionality into research design: an example using qualitative interviews
Windsong, E. A. (2016) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1268361 · Cited by 190
Foucault and the turn to narrative therapy
(Tina) Besley, A. C. (2002) · British Journal of Guidance & Counselling · doi:10.1080/03069880220128010 · Cited by 86
Women, power, and cancer: a Lancet Commission
Ginsburg, O., Vanderpuye, V. D. N. K., Beddoe, A. M., Bhoo‐Pathy, N., Bray, F., Caduff, C., Florez, N., Fadhil, I., Hammad, N., Heidari, S., et al. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01701-4 · Cited by 187
The spatialities of intersectional thinking: fashioning feminist geographic futures
Mollett, S., & Faria, C. (2018) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2018.1454404 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, S.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Sandra
- Venue
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0041-5715 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-5802
- OpenAlex
- W299429925
- Cited by
- 4,441
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 256 · 2024: 474 · 2023: 392 · 2022: 393 · 2021: 325 · 2020: 258 · 2019: 248 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- feminist theory, marginality, women's studies, African feminism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
