Cited by 9Wound Healing and TreatmentsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementPhytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants

Wound healing is promoted by Musa paradisiaca (banana) extract in diabetic rats

Open access
Cheng, Yung-Ze, Liu, I-Min, Cheng, Juei-Tang, Lin, Bor-Shyh, Liu, Flank·2020·Archives of Medical Science

Abstract

Introduction: Impairments in wound healing commonly occur among patients with diabetes. Herbal medicines have a long history of usage in wound care management. Super green (SG) is a newly discovered natural product obtained from Musa paradisiaca. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the topical application of SG in healing surgical wounds in diabetic rats. Material and methods: Wistar rats received a one-time intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin to induce type 1 diabetes. Full-thickness excisional skin wounds were created on the backs of the rats. The relevant groups were topically treated with the indicated concentrations of SG or vehicle dressing throughout the study duration. Histological analysis was performed and the mRNA levels of proinflammatory cytokines were measured to evaluate the improvement of wound closure. Results: The wound area ratio of the SG (1/6000 dilution)-treated group was greatly reduced compared to that of the vehicle-treated group. The histological analysis showed fewer inflammatory cells, accelerated re-epithelialization, and increased collagen deposition in SG 1/6000-treated wounds. The gene expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6 were decreased and the levels of type I and type III collagen were increased after SG treatment. Conclusions: These results show that the most therapeutically efficacious concentration of SG (1/6000 dilution) can enhance wound repair in diabetic rats. SG has the potential to be a new treatment strategy for diabetic wounds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5114/aoms.2020.92344

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical and animal model studies indicate that banana peel extract has no side effects on human volunteers and in model animals except for mild burning sensation felt by some subjects.

    “Its clinical and animal model studies indicate that this extract has no side effects on human volunteers and in model animals except for mild burning sensation felt by some subjects [3 - 5], therefore, offers eco-friendly product enrichment for cosmetic science.”

    From Formulation development, physical stability, and preliminary safety screening of cosmetic emulsions containing banana peel extract (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results section (page unavailable) says treated rat wounds appeared clean, without irritation or bleeding during the experiment. That supports a limited observation in rats, but the paper reports no human-volunteer study and does not document mild burning or establish an absence of all side effects. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]Kumar KPS, Bhowmik D, Duraivel S, et al. Traditional and medicinal uses of banana. J Pharmaco Phytochem 2012; 1: 51- 63.
  2. [15]Imam M, Akter S. Musa paradisiaca L. and Musa sapientum L: a phytochemical and pharmacological review. J App Pharm Sci 2011; 1: 14- 20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, Y.-Z., Liu, I.-M., Cheng, J.-T., Lin, B.-S., & Liu, F.
Affiliations
  • Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
  • Tajen University (TW)
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
  • Department of Research and Development, Natural Well Technical Company, Guishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Corresponding author
Cheng, Juei-Tang
Venue
Archives of Medical Science
Published
2020-01-19
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
632-640
ISSN
  • 1734-1922 (ISSN-L)
  • 1896-9151
OpenAlex
W3004367924
Cited by
8
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Archives of Medical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants
Keywords
wound healing, Musa paradisiaca, banana peel extract, diabetic wounds, type 1 diabetes, streptozotocin-induced diabetes, topical application, re-epithelialization, collagen deposition, inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, IL-1β, interleukin-6, anti-inflammatory activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review