Cited by 20Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationPublic Health Policies and Education

Tobacco control and sustainable development: shared challenges and future opportunities

Open access
Matthes, Britta, Zatoński, Mateusz·2019·Journal of Health Inequalities

Abstract

In recent years, scholars and public health officials have increasingly perceived tobacco as a threat to sustainable development.This article explores how stronger tobacco control efforts can contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations General Assembly in 2015.Most obviously, given that tobacco use and exposure account for over 7.2 million deaths annually, tobacco control is a fundamental prerequisite for achieving SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being.However, the article also shows how tobacco is, among others, a driver of poverty and inequalities, a threat to sustainable economic growth, a challenge to the environment, and an obstacle to good governance.In effect, tobacco hinders progress on a host of other SDGs.Particular emphasis is placed on SDG 17: Partnership for the goals.While tobacco control partnerships for the past decades have helped attain public health progress globally, there is a risk of this SDG being hijacked by the tobacco industry and other corporate actors, who use it as a tool to justify the proliferation of public-private partnerships.Finally, the article calls for greater cross-disciplinary thinking and closer collaboration between tobacco control and development scholars, which could be crucial in designing successful tobacco control interventions in low-and middle-income countries, and could help achieve the Sustainable Development Agenda.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5114/jhi.2019.87840

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Malone RE, Yang JS. Tobacco: a threat to development? Tob Control 2017; 26: 241-242.
  2. McNeish H. Rocketing smoking rates across Africa stoke TB and HIV fears. BMJ 2018; 361: k1884.
  3. Hosseinpoor AR, Parker LA, Tursan d'Espaignet E, Chatterji S. Socioeconomic inequality in smoking in low-income and mid- dle-income countries: results from the World Health Survey. PLoS One 2012; 7: e42843.
  4. Kim JE, Tsoh JY. Cigarette smoking among socioeconomically disadvantaged young adults in association with food insecurity and other factors. Prev Chronic Dis 2016; 13: E08.
  5. Vellios N, Ross H, Perucic AM. Trends in cigarette demand and supply in Africa. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0202467.
  6. Méndez D, Alshanqeety O, Warner KE. The potential impact of smoking control policies on future global smoking trends. Tob Control 2013; 22: 46-51.
  7. Connolly GN, Behm I, Osaki Y, Wayne GF. The impact of men- thol cigarettes on smoking initiation among non-smoking young females in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011; 8: 1-14.
  8. Lee K, Carpenter C, Challa C, et al. The strategic targeting of females by transnational tobacco companies in South Korea following trade liberalisation. Global Health 2009; 5: 2.
  9. Egbe CO, Bialous SA, Glantz SA. Avoiding "a massive spin-off effect in West Africa and beyond": the tobacco industry stymies tobacco control in Nigeria. Nicotine Tob Res 2017; 19: 877-887.
  10. McKee M, Bobak M, Rose R, et al. Patterns of smoking in Rus- sia. Tob Control 1998; 7: 22-26.
  11. Hitchman SC, Fong GT. Gender empowerment and female- to-male smoking prevalence ratios. Bull World Health Organ 2011; 89: 195-202.
  12. Hu TW, Lee AH. Commentary: Tobacco control and tobacco farming in African countries. J Public Health Policy 2015; 36: 41-51.
  13. Callard C. Follow the money: How the billions of dollars that flow from smokers in poor nations to companies in rich nations greatly exceed funding for global tobacco control and what might be done about it. Tob Control 2010; 19: 285-290.
  14. Otañez M, Glantz SA. Social responsibility in tobacco produc- tion? Tobacco companies use of green supply chains to obscure the real costs of tobacco farming. Tob Control 2011; 20: 403-411.
  15. Fotedar S, Fotedar V. Green tobacco sickness: a brief review. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2017; 21: 101-104.
  16. Joossens L, Raw M. Cigarette smuggling in Europe: who really benefits? Tob Control 1998; 7: 66-71.
  17. Gilmore AB, McKee M. Moving East: how the transnational tobacco industry gained entry to the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union-part I: establishing cigarette imports. Tob Control 2004; 13: 143-150.
  18. Gilmore AB, Gallagher AWA, Rowell A. Tobacco industry's elaborate attempts to control a global track and trace system and fundamentally undermine the Illicit Trade Protocol. Tob Control 2019; 28: 127-140.
  19. Novotny TE, Zhao F. Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use. Tob Control 1999; 8: 75-80.
  20. Slaughter E, Gersberg RM, Watanabe K, et al. Toxicity of cig- arette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish. Tob Control 2011; 20 Suppl 1: i25-29. Journal of HealtH InequalItIes 2019 / Volume 5 / Issue 1, June
  21. Lecours N, Almeida GE, Abdallah JM, Novotny TE. Environ- mental health impacts of tobacco farming: a review of the liter- ature. Tob Control 2012; 21: 191-196.
  22. Brathwaite R, Addo J, Smeeth L, Lock K. A systematic review of tobacco smoking prevalence and description of tobacco con- trol strategies in Sub-Saharan African countries; 2007 to 2014. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0132401.
  23. Ulucanlar S, Fooks GJ, Gilmore AB. The policy dystopia model: an interpretive analysis of tobacco industry political activity. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002125.
  24. Savell E, Gilmore AB, Fooks G. How does the tobacco indus- try attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review. PLoS One 2014; 9: e87389.
  25. Smith KE, Savell E, Gilmore AB. What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies. Tob Control 2013; 22: 144-153.
  26. Brandt AM. Inventing conflicts of interest: a history of tobacco industry tactics. Am J Public Health 2012; 102: 63-71.
  27. Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing, New York.
  28. Campbell R, Balbach ED. Mobilising public opinion for the tobacco industry: the consumer tax alliance and excise taxes. Tob Control 2008; 17: 351-356.
  29. Mukherjee A, Ekanayake EM. Epistemic communities and the global alliance against tobacco marketing. Thunderbird Int Business Rev 2009; 51: 207-218.
  30. Crosbie E, Sosa P, Glantz SA. Defending strong tobacco pack- aging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International. Tob Control 2018; 27: 185-194.
  31. Zatoński M. Poland's anti-tobacco advocacy -a historical out- line. J Health Inequal 2016; 2: 26-31.
  32. da Costa e Silva VL, Pantani D, Andreis M, et al. Bridging the gap between science and public health: taking advantage of tobacco control experience in Brazil to inform policies to counter risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Addiction 2013; 108: 1360-1366.
  33. Uang R, Crosbie E, Glantz SA. Tobacco control law implemen- tation in a middle-income country: Transnational tobacco control network overcoming tobacco industry opposition in Colombia. Glob Public Health 2018; 13: 1050-1064.
  34. Graen L. 2018. Tobacco industry: Truly transformed or using SDGs as a smokescreen for old strategies? In: Köhrer E, Abshagen ML, Cavazzini A, Grün J, Maier J (eds.). Highjack- ing the SDGs? The Private Sector and the Sustainable Devel- opment Goals. Berlin: Brot für die Welt Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V., German NGO Forum on Environment and Development, Unfairtobacco, Global Policy Forum, Bischöfliches Hilfswerk MISEREOR.
  35. Capewell S, Lloyd-Williams F. The role of the food industry in health: lessons from tobacco? Br Med Bull 2018; 125: 131-143.
  36. Lencucha R, Drope J, Labonte R. Rhetoric and the law, or the law of rhetoric: How countries oppose novel tobacco control measures at the World Trade Organization. Soc Sci Med 2016; 164: 100-107.
  37. Berg CJ, Fong GT, Thrasher JF. The impact and relevance of tobacco control research in low-and middle-income countries globally and to the US. Addict Behav 2018; 87: 162-168.
  38. Hipple Walters B, Petrea I, Lando H. Tobacco control in low- and middle-income countries: changing the present to help the future. J Smoking Cessation 2018; 13: 187-188.
  39. Namusisi Nyamurungi K, Achiri EN, Oginni A, et al. Interna- tional collaboration to build tobacco control capacity: a case study of KOMPLY from the World Heart Federation Emerging Leaders program. Tobacco Induced Diseases 2018; 16: A628.
  40. Kohrman M, Quan G, Wennan L, Proctor RN (eds.). Stanford University Press, Poisonous Pandas, Redwood City 2018.
  41. Neuburger MC. Balkan Smoke: Tobacco and the Making of Modern Bulgaria, Ithaca. Cornell University Press 2012.
  42. Szilágyi T, Chapman S. Tobacco industry efforts to erode tobac- co advertising controls in Hungary. Cent Eur J Public Health 2004; 12: 190-196.

Cited by

Authors
Matthes, B., & Zatoński, M.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Matthes, Britta
Venue
Journal of Health Inequalities
Published
2019
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
71-79
ISSN
  • 2450-5722 (ISSN-L)
  • 2450-5927
OpenAlex
W2974076204
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Health Inequalities (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
tobacco control, Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainable Development Goal 3, SDG 17, public-private partnerships, tobacco industry, poverty and inequality, sustainable economic growth, good governance, low- and middle-income countries, interdisciplinary collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review