Cited by 35Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceInnovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical Education

Can enriching emotional intelligence improve medical students’ proactivity and adaptability during OB/GYN clerkships?

Open access
Guseh, Stephanie H., Chen, Xiaodong P., Johnson, Natasha R.·2015·International Journal of Medical Education

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine our hypothesis that enriching workplace emotional intelligence through resident coaches could improve third-year medical students' adaptability and proactivity on the Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship. METHODS: An observational pilot study was conducted in a teaching hospital. Fourteen 3rd year medical students from two cohorts of clerkships were randomly divided into two groups, and equally assigned to trained resident coaches and untrained resident coaches. Data was collected through onsite naturalistic observation of students' adaptability and proactivity in clinical settings using a checklist with a 4-point Likert scale (1=poor to 4=excellent). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the differences between these two groups. RESULTS: A total of 280 data points were collected through onsite observations conducted by investigators. All (n=14) students' adaptability and proactivity performance significantly improved from an average of 3.04 to 3.45 (p=0.014) over 6-week clerkship. Overall, students with trained resident coaches adapted significantly faster and were more proactive in the obstetrics and gynecology clinical setting than the students with untrained coaches (3.31 vs. 3.24, p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from our pilot study supported our hypothesis that enriching workplace emotional intelligence knowledge through resident coaches was able to help medical students adapt into obstetrics and gynecology clinical settings faster and become more proactive in learning. Clerkship programs can incorporate the concept of a resident coach in their curriculum to help bridge medical students into clinical settings and to help them engage in self-directed learning throughout the rotation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5116/ijme.5658.0a6b

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guseh, S. H., Chen, X. P., & Johnson, N. R.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Natasha R.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Education
Published
2015-12-26
Volume
6
Pages
208-212
ISSN
2042-6372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2220014264
Cited by
35
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
emotional intelligence, medical students, adaptability, proactive behavior, obstetrics and gynecology clerkship, workplace emotional intelligence, self-directed learning
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Clinical Clerkship, Female, Gynecology, Humans, Male, Obstetrics, Pilot Projects, Students, Medical, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review