Cited by 60Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical Education

The effects of an online basic life support course on undergraduate nursing students’ learning.

Open access
Tobase, Lucia, Peres, Heloisa H.C., Gianotto-Oliveira, Renan, Smith, Nicole, Polastri, Thatiane F., Timerman, Sergio·2017·International Journal of Medical Education

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe learning outcomes of undergraduate nursing students following an online basic life support course (BLS). METHODS: An online BLS course was developed and administered to 94 nursing students. Pre- and post-tests were used to assess theoretical learning. Checklist simulations and feedback devices were used to assess the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills of the 62 students who completed the course. RESULTS: A paired t-test revealed a significant increase in learning [pre-test (6.4 ± 1.61), post-test (9.3 ± 0.82), p < 0.001]. The increase in the average grade after taking the online course was significant (p<0.001). No learning differences (p=0.475) had been observed between 1st and 2nd year (9.20 ± 1.60), and between 3rd and 4th year (9.67 ± 0.61) students. A CPR simulation was performed after completing the course: students checked for a response (90%), exposed the chest (98%), checked for breathing (97%), called emergency services (76%), requested for a defibrillator (92%), checked for a pulse (77%), positioned their hands properly (87%), performed 30 compressions/cycle (95%), performed compressions of at least 5 cm depth (89%), released the chest (90%), applied two breaths (97%), used the automated external defibrillator (97%), and positioned the pads (100%). CONCLUSIONS: The online course was an effective method for teaching and learning key BLS skills wherein students were able to accurately apply BLS procedures during the CPR simulation. This short-term online training, which likely improves learning and self-efficacy in BLS providers, can be used for the continuing education of health professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5116/ijme.5985.cbce

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online and blended learning sustain instructional continuity and improve theoretical knowledge.

    “Online and blended learning sustain instructional continuity and improve theoretical knowledge (10, 11)”

    From Application effect of Miller’s pyramid teaching method based on HeartCode BLS in basic life support training for nursing students (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (page unavailable) report significantly higher written-test scores after the online BLS course, supporting improved theoretical knowledge in undergraduate nursing students. The Conclusions say the course could be used for continuing education, but the paper does not establish that online or blended learning sustains instructional continuity, and it does not study blended learning. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Country-level decision making for control of chronic diseases: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2012. 24830055
  2. [11]Ono T. The construction of an instructional design model for Medical English Education in Japan. Educational Studies. International Christian University. 2014;54:213-231.
  3. [12]Knowles MS, Holton III EF, Swanson RA. The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. 6th edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2005.
  4. [25]de Ruijter PA Biersteker HA Biert J van Goor H Tan EC Retention of first aid and basic life support skills in undergraduate medical students. Med Educ Online 2014 19 24841 192 10.3402/meo.v19.24841 25382803 PMC4224704 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobase, L., Peres, H. H. C., Gianotto-Oliveira, R., Smith, N., Polastri, T. F., & Timerman, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
International Journal of Medical Education
Published
2017-08-25
Volume
8
Pages
309-313
ISSN
2042-6372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2749219422
Cited by
60
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universidade de São Paulo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
basic life support, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, online courses, nursing students, CPR skills, simulation-based assessment, automated external defibrillators, self-efficacy, continuing education, learning outcomes
MeSH terms
Simulation Training, Clinical Competence, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Education, Nursing, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Students, Nursing, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Self Efficacy, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review