Cited by 43Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical Education

Basic life support training for undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review.

Dick-Smith, Felicity, Power, Tamara, Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto, Elliott, Doug·2021·Nurse Education in Practice

Abstract

The aim of this review was to identify the role of basic life support training interventions in international undergraduate nursing education, that support optimal acquisition and retention of knowledge, psychomotor skills and resuscitation self-efficacy. Twenty-four articles were identified and analysed using an integrative review approach. Studies were reviewed for quality using a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Common objective and standardised methods of basic life support education practice were identified: instructor led, simulation experiences, self-directed learning, skills training combined with clinical practicum, and computer-based training. Evaluation of competency was collected primarily from multiple-choice questionnaires or researcher-designed checklists, with a lack of objective performance data noted. Importantly, current teaching approaches do not guarantee acquisition or retention of basic life support skills. Objective feedback from technologies supporting cardiopulmonary resuscitation training may be useful in acquisition and retention of psychomotor skills, and therefore requires further exploration. Development of robust, psychometrically sound instruments are needed to accurately and consistently measure nursing students' skills performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102957

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dick-Smith, F., Power, T., Martinez-Maldonado, R., & Elliott, D.
Affiliations
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
Nurse Education in Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
50
Pages
102957
ISSN
1471-5953 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3118170818
Cited by
40
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education in Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
basic life support, CPR training, undergraduate nursing education, psychomotor skills, skill retention, simulation-based training, self-directed learning, computer-based training, competency assessment, objective feedback, nursing students
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Students, Nursing, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review