Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The End of the Virtual : Digital Methods

Rogers, Richard·2009·Amsterdam University Press eBooks

Abstract

Richard Rogers neemt in zijn onderzoek het internet als studieobject en introduceert het ontologische verschil tussen enerzijds objecten, inhoud, apparaten en omgevingen die zijn 'geboren' in het nieuwe medium (the natively digital) en anderzijds objecten, inhoud, apparaten en omgevingen die er naartoe zijn 'verhuisd' (the digitized). In zijn oratie vraagt hij zich af of de huidige onderzoeksmethoden moeten veranderen uitgaande van de focus op objecten en inhoud van het medium. Daarnaast stelt hij dat internetonderzoek voor nieuwe doeleinden kan worden ingezet, de nadruk leggend op natively digital-methoden in plaats van digitized-methoden. Rogers streeft ernaar de aandacht te verleggen naar the natively digital, gebruikmakend van de mogelijkheden die worden geboden met het veranderen van inkt in bits. Ook wil hij bekijken hoe internetonderzoek verder zou kunnen gaan dan alleen de bestudering van online cultuur.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5117/9789056295936

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, R.
Venue
Amsterdam University Press eBooks
Published
2009
OpenAlex
W75967587
Cited by
282
References
2
FWCI
66.66
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.