The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mobile-Assisted Language Learning
Open accessAbstract
The main characteristics of mobile learning (m-learning) are recognized as the potential for learning process to be personalized, spontaneous, informal and ubiquitous.Although learning through mobile phones may take longer time compared to computers, the learners feel a greater sense of freedom of time and place, so that they can take the advantage of spare time to learn a second language when and where they are.Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) deals with the use of mobile technology in language learning.In contrast to classroom learning, in MALL there is no need for the learners to sit in a classroom or at a computer to get learning materials.In fact, MALL can be considered an ideal solution to language learning barriers in terms of time and place.In this paper by looking at some applications of m-learning as well as some examples across various aspects of it, we observe the advantages and disadvantages derived from using mobile technologies for students as well as professionals.Here, it has been tried to demonstrate the benefits of using mobile phones in learning English as a second language.Areas of mobile-based language learning discussed in this paper are vocabulary, listening, grammar, phonetics, and reading comprehension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning.
Sharples, M. (2000) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(99)00044-5 · Cited by 1,092
Cited by
Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art
Kukulska‐Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12580 · Cited by 382
How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Yang, J.-M. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001 · Cited by 279
Proposing a task-oriented chatbot system for EFL learners speaking practice
Hsu, M.-H., Chen, P.-S., & Yu, C.-S. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1960864 · Cited by 119
Tracking Learner Usage of Mobile Phones for Language Learning Outside of the Classroom
Stockwell, G. (2013) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v30i0.118-136 · Cited by 72
Constancy (the New Media “C”) and Future Generations
Borzekowski, D. L. G. (2019) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198119863775 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Miangah, T. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Distributed and Parallel systems
- Published
- 2012-01-31
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 0976-9757 (ISSN-L)
- 2229-3957
- OpenAlex
- W2065506471
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.