Cited by 22Artificial Intelligence in EducationAcademic integrity and plagiarismEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Ethical use of artificial intelligence and new technologies in Education 5.0

Open access
Smyrnaiou, Zacharoula, Liapakis, Anastasios, Bougia, Anna·2023·Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science

Abstract

AI-powered tools such as text-generating algorithms, automatic essay graders, and plagiarism detection software are some of the tools that may be used by the students for improving their skills.For Primary and Secondary Education students, Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools offer a variety of ideas, essay outlines and answers to questions.Generally, students can use AI tools appropriately to improve their learning experience.However, AI tools can be used by students for cheating on assignments and/or exams.It is crucial for a professor or a school generally, to educate students on the ethical use of AI-powered tools and emphasize the importance of academic integrity to prevent cheating.The purpose of this paper is to examine and propose some AI-powered tools that could be used by professors for enhancing students' interaction and engagement.Moreover, the ethical issues for using AI and New Technologies in Primary and Secondary Education will be described using the examples of the proposed AI-tools.Finally, some recommendations and scenarios for responsible use of AI will be suggested in order to be used by policy makers and schools.The findings will be practical and significant, as not enough attention has been paid in Ethical use of AI in Primary and Secondary education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51219/jaimld/anastasios-liapakis/15

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rochegonde LD. New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI. Politique Etrangere 2021;2:207-208.
  2. Grossman J, Lin Z, Sheng H, Wei JTZ, Williams JJ, Goel S. MathBot: Transforming online resources for learning math into conversational interactions. AAAI 2019.
  3. Rubel A, Castro C, Pham A. Algorithms and autonomy: the ethics of automated decision systems. Cambridge University Press 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smyrnaiou, Z., Liapakis, A., & Bougia, A.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Computer Technology Institute and Press “DIOPHANTUS” (GR)
Corresponding author
Liapakis, Anastasios
Venue
Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science
Published
2023-10-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
119-124
ISSN
2583-9888 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387569772
Cited by
22
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning and Data Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, AI ethics, academic integrity, cheating, K-12 education, AI tools, responsible AI use, student engagement, plagiarism detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review