CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58Public Procurement and PolicyConstruction Project Management and PerformanceCorruption and Economic Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring anti-corruption capabilities of e-procurement in construction project delivery in Nigeria

Open access
Aduwo, Egidario, Ibem, Eziyi, Afolabi, Adedeji, Oluwunmi, Adedamola, Tunji-Olayeni, Patience, Ayo-Vaughan, Emmanuel, Uwakonye, Uwakonye, Oni, Aderonke·2020·Construction Economics and Building
DOI 10.5130/ajceb.v20i1.6964
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The use of electronic (e-­) procurement to support the execution of supply chain management activities in the different industrial sectors is permeating all regions of the world. However, in countries in sub-Saharan Africa where there is a significant level of corruption and unethical practices in the procurement process, there is a need for a better understanding of how e-Procurement can help to check the incidence of corrupt and unethical practices in construction project delivery. This study relied on a cross-sectional survey of 759 respondents, including architects, builders, engineers, estate/facilities managers, contractors, construction/project managers, quantity surveyors, supply chain managers and others to identify and analyse the anti-corruption capabilities of e-Procurement in construction project delivery in Nigeria. The results of the descriptive statistics, relative importance index and principal components analysis identified 18 anti-corruption capabilities in e-Procurement in construction project delivery with the three most important ones being the capability of e-Procurement to ensure good inventory management/record keeping; accountability by providing audit services trail and minimise direct human contacts during bidding. The key underlying dimensions of these capabilities include the advantage of e-Procurement over the traditional paper-based method; transparent bidding process and increase in competition in construction project delivery process. The findings of this study have implications, especially, on the use of e-Procurement to curb corruption in construction procurement activities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5130/ajceb.v20i1.6964

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Adeyemo, A.A. and Amade, B., 2016. Corruption and Construction Projects in Nigeria: Manifestations and Solutions. PM World Journal, 5(10), pp.1-14.
  2. Agwor, T.C.2015.Promoting Transparency and Accountability for Sustainable Democracy in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(6):208-2014
  3. Cochran, W. G. 1963. Sampling Technique. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
  4. Eadie, R., Perera, S., Heaney, G. and Carlisle, J., 2007. Drivers and Barriers to Public Sector adoption of e-procurement within Northern Ireland's Construction Industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 12, pp.103-20. Available at: http://www.itcon.org/2007/
  5. Eadie, R., Perera, S. and Heaney, G. 2010. A cross-discipline comparison of rankings for e-procurement drivers and barriers within UK Construction Organizations, Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 15, pp. 217-23. http://www.itcon.org/2010/6
  6. Gupta, S., Jha, B. & Gupta, H.2009.E-Procurement: A Developing Country Perspective: A Study on New Trends Concerned with Developing Countries', AIUB Journal of Business and Economics, 122(1), pp. 161-75
  7. Hashim, N., Said I. and Idris, K.., 2014. e-Procurement Implementation in Malaysian Construction Industry. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Science, 8(6), 231-38.
  8. Isikdag, U., 2019. An Evaluation of Barriers to e-Procurement in Turkish Construction Industry. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(4), pp.252-59.
  9. Kasimu M.A & Kolawole A.F.2015. Appraisal of the impact of corruption on sustainable development in Nigerian Construction Industry. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology ( JMEST), 2(10), 2834-2842
  10. Stansbury, N. 2005.Exposing the foundations of corruption in construction. In Global Corruption Report (2005) Special Focus: Corruption in Construction and Post Conflict Reconstruction. Pluto Press, London.
  11. Vitkauskaite, E. and Gatautis, R., 2008. E-Procurement Perspectives in Construction Sector. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(4), pp.287-94.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Aduwo, E., Ibem, E., Afolabi, A., Oluwunmi, A., Tunji-Olayeni, P., Ayo-Vaughan, E., Uwakonye, U., & Oni, A.
Affiliations
  • Covenant University (NG)
  • University of Nigeria (NG)
  • Bells University of Technology (NG)
Corresponding author
Aduwo, Egidario
ORCID
Venue
Construction Economics and Building
Publisher
University of Technology, Sydney (UTS)
Published
2020-03-07
Volume
20
Issue
1
ISSN
2204-9029 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5130/ajceb.v20i1.6964
OpenAlex
W3021517386
Cited by
44
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Construction Economics and Building (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Covenant University
  • Covenant University Centre for Research, Innovation and Discovery
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
Keywords
e-procurement, construction project delivery, construction procurement, corruption, supply chain management, accountability, inventory management, Nigeria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review