The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring anti-corruption capabilities of e-procurement in construction project delivery in Nigeria
Open accessAbstract
The use of electronic (e-) procurement to support the execution of supply chain management activities in the different industrial sectors is permeating all regions of the world. However, in countries in sub-Saharan Africa where there is a significant level of corruption and unethical practices in the procurement process, there is a need for a better understanding of how e-Procurement can help to check the incidence of corrupt and unethical practices in construction project delivery. This study relied on a cross-sectional survey of 759 respondents, including architects, builders, engineers, estate/facilities managers, contractors, construction/project managers, quantity surveyors, supply chain managers and others to identify and analyse the anti-corruption capabilities of e-Procurement in construction project delivery in Nigeria. The results of the descriptive statistics, relative importance index and principal components analysis identified 18 anti-corruption capabilities in e-Procurement in construction project delivery with the three most important ones being the capability of e-Procurement to ensure good inventory management/record keeping; accountability by providing audit services trail and minimise direct human contacts during bidding. The key underlying dimensions of these capabilities include the advantage of e-Procurement over the traditional paper-based method; transparent bidding process and increase in competition in construction project delivery process. The findings of this study have implications, especially, on the use of e-Procurement to curb corruption in construction procurement activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Transparency in bidding fosters competition and aids in curbing corruption within construction procurement activities.”
From Transformative Procurement Trends: Integrating Industry 4.0 Technologies for Enhanced Procurement Processes (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Through 759 crosssectional surveys conducted across different fields in Nigeria, the researchers identify 18 anti-corruption capabilities associated with e-procurement in construction project de-livery.”
From Transformative Procurement Trends: Integrating Industry 4.0 Technologies for Enhanced Procurement Processes (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPSS survival manual : a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS
Pallant, J. (2010) · Cited by 6,888
Accountability to Prevent Corruption in Construction Projects
Sohail, M., & Cavill, S. (2008) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2008)134:9(729 · Cited by 260
Ambraseys, N. N., & Bilham, R. G. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/469153a · Cited by 221
Corruption Forms in the Construction Industry: Literature Review
Chan, A. P. C., & Owusu, E. K. (2017) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001353 · Cited by 204
Heide, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_76-1 · Cited by 202
Overview of Corruption Research in Construction
Le, Y., Shan, M., Chan, A. P. C., & Hu, Y. (2014) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000300 · Cited by 190
Puiu, S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_571-1 · Cited by 185
Benchmarking in public procurement
Raymond, J. (2008) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/14635770810915940 · Cited by 184
Causal Factors of Corruption in Construction Project Management: An Overview
Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P. C., & Shan, M. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-0002-4 · Cited by 148
Ethical behaviour in the South African construction industry
Bowen, P. A., Akintoye, A., Pearl, R., & Edwards, P. J. (2007) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446190701225707 · Cited by 142
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Adeyemo, A.A. and Amade, B., 2016. Corruption and Construction Projects in Nigeria: Manifestations and Solutions. PM World Journal, 5(10), pp.1-14.
- Agwor, T.C.2015.Promoting Transparency and Accountability for Sustainable Democracy in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(6):208-2014
- Cochran, W. G. 1963. Sampling Technique. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
- Eadie, R., Perera, S., Heaney, G. and Carlisle, J., 2007. Drivers and Barriers to Public Sector adoption of e-procurement within Northern Ireland's Construction Industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 12, pp.103-20. Available at: http://www.itcon.org/2007/
- Eadie, R., Perera, S. and Heaney, G. 2010. A cross-discipline comparison of rankings for e-procurement drivers and barriers within UK Construction Organizations, Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 15, pp. 217-23. http://www.itcon.org/2010/6
- Gupta, S., Jha, B. & Gupta, H.2009.E-Procurement: A Developing Country Perspective: A Study on New Trends Concerned with Developing Countries', AIUB Journal of Business and Economics, 122(1), pp. 161-75
- Hashim, N., Said I. and Idris, K.., 2014. e-Procurement Implementation in Malaysian Construction Industry. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Science, 8(6), 231-38.
- Isikdag, U., 2019. An Evaluation of Barriers to e-Procurement in Turkish Construction Industry. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(4), pp.252-59.
- Kasimu M.A & Kolawole A.F.2015. Appraisal of the impact of corruption on sustainable development in Nigerian Construction Industry. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology ( JMEST), 2(10), 2834-2842
- Stansbury, N. 2005.Exposing the foundations of corruption in construction. In Global Corruption Report (2005) Special Focus: Corruption in Construction and Post Conflict Reconstruction. Pluto Press, London.
- Vitkauskaite, E. and Gatautis, R., 2008. E-Procurement Perspectives in Construction Sector. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(4), pp.287-94.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khan, A., Krishnan, S., & Dhir, A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120737 · Cited by 209
Althabatah, A., Yaqot, M., Menezes, B., & Kerbache, L. (2023) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics7030063 · Cited by 108
“Adowo et al. [65] investigate the potential of e-procurement in combating corruption and unethical practices in construction project delivery in Nigeria.”
BackgroundThe grand challenge: Effective anti-corruption measures in projects
Lehtinen, J., Locatelli, G., Sainati, T., Artto, K. A., & Evans, B. (2022) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.04.003 · Cited by 66
Evolution of Electronic Procurement: Contemporary Review of Adoption and Implementation Strategies
Chan, A. P. C., & Owusu, E. K. (2022) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings12020198 · Cited by 34
Addy, M. N., Addo, E. T., Kwofie, T. E., & Yartey, J. E. (2022) · Construction Innovation · doi:10.1108/ci-09-2021-0174 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Aduwo, E., Ibem, E., Afolabi, A., Oluwunmi, A., Tunji-Olayeni, P., Ayo-Vaughan, E., Uwakonye, U., & Oni, A.
- Affiliations
- Covenant University (NG)
- University of Nigeria (NG)
- Bells University of Technology (NG)
- Corresponding author
- Aduwo, Egidario
- ORCID
- Venue
- Construction Economics and Building
- Published
- 2020-03-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2204-9029 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3021517386
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Construction Economics and Building (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Covenant University
- Covenant University Centre for Research, Innovation and Discovery
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Keywords
- e-procurement, construction project delivery, construction procurement, corruption, supply chain management, accountability, inventory management, Nigeria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
