Cited by 12Infrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringCivil and Structural Engineering ResearchStructural Health Monitoring Techniques

Advancing Civil Engineering with AI and Machine Learning: From Structural Health to Sustainable Development

Open access
Sargiotis, Dimitrios·2024·International Journal of Architecture and Planning

Abstract

The rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have significantly transformed civil engineering, offering innovative solutions that enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and sustainability of various engineering practices. AI technologies, including neural networks and deep learning, coupled with ML techniques, are automating complex tasks, optimizing designs, and improving decision-making processes. This paper explores the pivotal role AI and ML play across multiple domains of civil engineering, including structural health monitoring, predictive maintenance, earthquake engineering, and environmental sustainability. By employing AI-driven technologies such as convolutional neural networks and genetic algorithms, this study highlights how these innovations facilitate early detection of structural damage, enhance predictive modeling in seismic areas, and contribute to optimizing renewable energy systems. Additionally, the integration of AI with finite element analysis is examined for its impact on improving simulation accuracy and infrastructure resilience. Challenges related to data quality, ethical considerations, and system integration are also discussed, emphasizing the need for continued research to unlock AI's full potential in civil engineering. The paper concludes by addressing future trends, including digital twins, autonomous construction technologies, and the potential for smart infrastructure systems to support sustainable urban development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51483/ijarp.4.2.2024.54-81

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Convolutional neural networks can detect and classify cracks in concrete images with high accuracy.

    “For instance, convolutional neural networks (a DL subclass) can detect and classify cracks in concrete images with high accuracy (Sargiotis, 2024).”

    From Artificial intelligence in civil engineering: emerging applications and opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as Sargiotis, 2024

    The Conclusion’s Figure 4 description says CNNs are used to detect cracks in structures, and §3.2.2 describes CNNs as effective for image classification. The paper does not establish that CNNs classify cracks specifically in concrete images with high accuracy; its high-accuracy statement concerns vibration-based damage detection more generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous reviews on AI in civil engineering do not reflect the latest AI paradigms such as generative design or large language models.

    “While previous reviews have addressed AI in civil engineering (e.g., Sargiotis, 2024; Baghbani et al., 2022), many do not reflect the latest AI paradigms such as generative design or large language models.”
  • Common ML techniques have proven effective in civil engineering contexts.

    “Common ML techniques such as regression models, decision trees, support vector machines, random forests, and neural networks have proven effective in civil engineering contexts (Sargiotis, 2024; Sargiotis, 2024).”
  • Ethical issues related to data privacy, autonomous systems, and workforce impacts are paramount.

    “Ethical issues related to data privacy, autonomous systems, and workforce impacts are also paramount (Megdad et al., 2024; Sargiotis, 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Barocas, S. and Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big Data's Disparate Impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671-732.
  2. Bishop, C.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.
  3. Camp, C.V. and Bichon, B.J. (2004). Design of Space Trusses Using Big Bang-Big Crunch Optimization. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(8), 1202-1211.
  4. Chui, M., Manyika, J. and Miremadi, M. (2018). What AI Can and Can't Do (Yet) for Your Business. McKinsey Quarterly.
  5. European Parliament. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and Amending Various Regulations (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 1689, 1-144.
  6. Farrar, C.R. and Worden, K. (2013). An Introduction to Structural Health Monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), 303-315.
  7. Farrar, C.R. and Worden, K. (2013). Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective, Wiley.
  8. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
  9. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Hinton, G.E. (2012). ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. in Proceedings of the 25 th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 1 (NIPS'12), Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 1097-1105.
  10. McCarthy, J., Minsky, M.L., Rochester, N. and Shannon, C.E. (2006). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12-14.
  11. Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4 th Ed., Pearson.
  12. Sutton, R.S. and Barto, A.G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2 nd Ed., MIT Press.
  13. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., ... and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is All You Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998-6008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sargiotis, D.
Affiliations
National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Sargiotis, Dimitrios
Venue
International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Publisher
SvedbergOpen
Published
2024-09-05
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
54-81
ISSN
2788-5046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405702176
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Architecture and Planning (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Keywords
artificial intelligence in civil engineering, machine learning, structural health monitoring, predictive maintenance, earthquake engineering, structural damage detection, convolutional neural networks, genetic algorithm, renewable energy optimization, finite element analysis, infrastructure resilience, digital twin, autonomous construction, smart infrastructure, sustainable urban development, data quality, ethical considerations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review