Cited by 60BIM and Construction IntegrationInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsRobotics and Automated Systems

Robotics in the Construction Sector: Trends, Advances, and Challenges

Open access
Liu, Yuming, A.H., Alias, Haron, Nuzul Azam, N.A., Bakar, Wang, Hao·2024·Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems

Abstract

Construction robots employ cutting-edge technology to perform tasks more accurately than traditional construction workers, producing higher-quality results and fewer mistakes. Moreover, although construction robotics is a demanding topic in construction sector research, more review studies that track and anticipate adoption trends are required in the construction sector. This study aims to bridge this gap by identifying the adoption challenges and limitations of construction robots and the opportunities offered to the construction sector. To achieve this aim, the study adopts a systematic literature review approach using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Additionally, the systematic literature review focuses on the framework for categorizing technological advances and potential trends in development over the past decade. The review results reveal that: (a) current robotic technology covered four critical perspectives including perception, mobility, manipulation, and collaboration; (b) promoting the sector requires attention to safety and ethical issues because of the risks associated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10846-024-02104-4

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-enabled robotic systems are increasingly used for broader construction inspection and maintenance tasks.

    “For instance, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with sensors can inspect high-rise structures or difficult terrain, (Liu et al., 2024), and AI-enabled robotic systems are increasingly used for broader construction inspection and maintenance tasks (Liu et al., 2024).”

    From Artificial intelligence in civil engineering: emerging applications and opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2024

    The Abstract discusses construction-robot adoption trends but does not address increasing use of AI-enabled robots for inspection and maintenance. Searches for inspection, maintenance, and AI-enabled robotics returned relevant titles only in the References, not a passage making the claimed point. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • UAVs equipped with sensors can inspect high-rise structures or difficult terrain.

    “For instance, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with sensors can inspect high-rise structures or difficult terrain, (Liu et al., 2024), and AI-enabled robotic systems are increasingly used for broader construction inspection and maintenance tasks (Liu et al., 2024).”

    From Artificial intelligence in civil engineering: emerging applications and opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2024

    The matching passages are in the References section (no page given), including a citation to work on UAV-based urban structural damage assessment. Searches for sensor-equipped UAV inspection, high-rise structures, and difficult terrain found no passage in our copy stating the attributed claim; reference titles alone do not establish that Liu et al. make it. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lianfa, L., Jun, T.: The Main Experience of International Robot Industry Policy and Its Enlightenment for China. J. Wuhan Uni. of Sci. & Tech. 22(05), 558–571 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-3699.2020.05.013. (Social Science Edition) · DOI
  2. Duan, H., Zhang, F., Chen, G., Chen, L., Luo Q.: Practice and development of intelligent construction driven by building robots. Constr Econ. 43 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14181/j.cnki.1002-851x.202211005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., A.H., A., Haron, N. A., N.A., B., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Liu, Yuming
Venue
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Published
2024-05-10
Volume
110
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0921-0296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0409
OpenAlex
W4396798681
Cited by
60
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 3
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
Keywords
construction robotics, technology adoption, barriers to adoption, robot perception, robot mobility, robotic manipulation, human-robot collaboration, construction safety, robot ethics, construction automation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review