Cited by 66Wildlife Ecology and ConservationWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife Management

Current status of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka

Open access
Fernando, P, Jayewardene, J, Prasad, T, Hendavitharana, W, Pastorini, Jennifer·2011·International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Abstract

Sri Lanka holds an important position with regard to Asian elephant conservation. Well over 10% of the global Asian elephant population in less than 2% of elephant range (Leimgruber et al. 2003), makes Sri Lanka the range country with the highest density of elephants. It also has one of the highest human densities among rangecountries. Therefore successes and failures in Sri Lanka can provide critical insights into mitigating human-elephant conflict (HEC) and conserving elephants. In addition Sri Lankan elephants are recognized as a distinct subspecies. Although genetic support for a sub-specific distinction is low, Sri Lanka has the highest genetic diversity of Asian elephants (Fernando et al. 2000; Fleisher et al. 2001).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5167/uzh-59037

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fernando P, Kumar M, Williams AC, Wikramanayake E, Aziz T, Singh SM (2008b) Review of Human-Elephant Conflict Mitigation Methods Practiced in South Asia. AREAS Technical Support Document, WWF. <http:// www.ccrsl.org/CCR/Literature.
  2. Kurt, F. and Marion Garai (2007) The Sri Lanka Elephant in Captivity. Published by the Cambridge University Press (Pvt.) Ltd. New Delhi, India.
  3. Somasuntharam K et al. (1959) Sessional Paper XIX. Report of the Committee on Preservation of Wild Life. Government Press. Ceylon.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernando, P., Jayewardene, J., Prasad, T., Hendavitharana, W., & Pastorini, J.
Venue
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Publisher
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Published
2011
Volume
35
Pages
93-103
OpenAlex
W2395456306
Cited by
66
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
  • Gajah
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
Asian elephant, Sri Lanka, elephant conservation, human-elephant conflict, genetic diversity, population density, human population density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review