The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meat analog as future food: a review
Open accessAbstract
The definition of meat analog refers to the replacement of the main ingredient with other than meat. It also called a meat substitute, meat alternatives, fake or mock meat, and imitation meat. The increased importance of meat analog in the current trend is due to the health awareness among consumers in their diet and for a better future environment. The factors that lead to this shift is due to low fat and calorie foods intake, flexitarians, animal disease, natural resources depletion, and to reduce greenhouse gas emission. Currently, available marketed meat analog products are plant-based meat in which the quality (i.e., texture and taste) are similar to the conventional meat. The ingredients used are mainly soy proteins with novel ingredients added, such as mycoprotein and soy leghemoglobin. However, plant-based meat is sold primarily in Western countries. Asian countries also will become a potential market in the near future due to growing interest in this product. With the current advance technology, lab-grown meat with no livestock raising or known as cultured meat will be expected to boost the food market in the future. Also, insect-based products will be promising to be the next protein resource for human food. Nevertheless, other than acceptability, cost-effective, reliable production, and consistent quality towards those products, product safety is the top priority. Therefore, the regulatory frameworks need to be developed alongside.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular regulation of stem cell quiescence
Cheung, T. H., & Rando, T. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3591 · Cited by 1,148 · cited 1×
“Generally, the stem cells itself have the self-renewing ability so that it can create new muscle tissue on its own as long as there are growth factors available [35,36].”
BackgroundEnvironmental impacts of cultured meat production
Tuomisto, H. L., & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es200130u · Cited by 891
Nonmeat Protein Alternatives as Meat Extenders and Meat Analogs
Asgar, M. A., Fazilah, A., Huda, N., Bhat, R., & Karim, A. A. (2010) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00124.x · Cited by 505
Cultured meat from muscle stem cells: A review of challenges and prospects
Kadim, I. T., Mahgoub, O., Baqir, S., Faye, B., & Purchas, R. (2015) · Journal of Integrative Agriculture · doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(14)60881-9 · Cited by 252
Cited by
Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production
Rubio, N. R., Xiang, N., & Kaplan, D. L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y · Cited by 606
Metadata
- Authors
- Ismail, I., Hwang, Y.-H., & Joo, S.-T.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science and Technology
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-120
- ISSN
- 1598-9429 (ISSN-L)
- 2672-0191
- 2055-0391
- OpenAlex
- W3015685586
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.