Cited by 379Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric Ozone and Climate

Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume V – heterogeneous reactions on solid substrates

Open access
Crowley, J. N., Ammann, M., Cox, R. A., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Mellouki, A., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J. +1 more·2010·Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. This article, the fifth in the ACP journal series, presents data evaluated by the IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric Chemistry. It covers the heterogeneous processes on surfaces of solid particles present in the atmosphere, for which uptake coefficients and adsorption parameters have been presented on the IUPAC website in 2010. The article consists of an introduction and guide to the evaluation, giving a unifying framework for parameterisation of atmospheric heterogeneous processes. We provide summary sheets containing the recommended uptake parameters for the evaluated processes. Four substantial appendices contain detailed data sheets for each process considered for ice, mineral dust, sulfuric acid hydrate and nitric acid hydrate surfaces, which provide information upon which the recommendations are made.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/acp-10-9059-2010

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uptake coefficients of Eqs. (1) and (2) have been experimentally determined, but not under stratospheric conditions.

    “Uptake coef fi cients of Eqs. (1) and (2) have been experimentally determined, but not under stratospheric conditions 21,22 .”

    From Experimental reaction rates constrain estimates of ozone response to calcium carbonate geoengineering (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    The paper reports experimentally measured uptake coefficients, including values in its Additional information section. But the citing sentence does not identify the reactions in its Eqs. (1) and (2), and this source also reports measurements at 191.5–205 K for ClONO₂ uptake on SAT. The claim that the relevant coefficients were not measured under stratospheric conditions is therefore not established by the passages in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Langenberg, S., PhD thesis: 'Anwendung de Kapillar-Gaschromatographie..' , Univer- sity of Bonn, Germany, 1997. References
  2. Symington A.M., Heterogeneous interactions of oxygenated organics and hydrogen peroxide with ice at temperatures of the upper troposphere, PhD Thesis, Dept.of Chem- istry, University of Cambridge, UK, 2009.
  3. Symington et al., PhD thesis: Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Cam- bridge, 2009.
  4. Bartels-Rausch, T., Guimbaud, C., G äggeler, H. W., and Ammann, M.: Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L16110, doi:10.1029/2004/GL020070, 2004, (erratum reported in Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L23106, doi:10.1029/2004/GL021838, 2004. · DOI
  5. Domin é, F. and Rey-Hanot, L.: Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(18), 2021-2024, 2002.
  6. Hynes, R. G., Fernandez, M. A., and Cox, R. A.: J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4797, doi:10.1029/2001JD001557, 2002. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Allanic, A., Oppliger, R., Van den Bergh, H., and Rossi, M. J.: Z. Phys. Chemie, 214(11), 1479, 2000.
  8. Allanic, A., Oppliger, R., Van den Bergh, H., and Rossi, M. J.: Z. Phys. Chemie, 214(11), 1479, 2000. References
  9. McNeill, V. F., Loerting, T., Geiger, F. M., Trout, B. L., and Molina, M. J.: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.(US), 103, 9422, 2006.
  10. McNeill, V. F., Loerting, T., Geiger, F. M., Trout, B. L., and Mario Molina, M. J.: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.(US), 103, 9422, 2006.
  11. McNeill, V. F., Loerting, T., Geiger, F. M., Trout, B. L., and Molina, M. J.: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA), 103, 9422-9427, 2006.
  12. Hanson, D. R. and Raivshankara, A. R.: Reactions of halogen species on ice surfaces, in: The tropospheric chemistry of ozone in the polar regions, edited by: Niki, H. and Becker, K. H., Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg:, 1993.
  13. Hanson, D. R. and Raivshankara, A. R.: Reactions of halogen species on ice surfaces, in: The tropospheric chemistry of ozone in the polar regions, edited by: Niki, H. and Becker, K. H., Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1993. References
  14. Matsuki, A., et. al: Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L22806, doi:10.1029/2005GL0244176, 2005. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crowley, J. N., Ammann, M., Cox, R. A., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Mellouki, A., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., & Wallington, T. J.
Affiliations
  • International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (US)
  • Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Ford Motor Company (United States) (US)
Venue
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Published
2010-09-30
Volume
10
Issue
18
Pages
9059-9223
ISSN
  • 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-7324
OpenAlex
W3033358318
Cited by
379
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 26
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • European Science Foundation
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 357)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Keywords
uptake coefficient, adsorption parameters, ice surfaces, mineral dust, sulfuric acid hydrates, nitric acid hydrates, gas-surface reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review