The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for the global mercury budget
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Mercury (Hg) is emitted to the atmosphere mainly as volatile elemental Hg0. Oxidation to water-soluble HgII plays a major role in Hg deposition to ecosystems. Here, we implement a new mechanism for atmospheric Hg0 ∕ HgII redox chemistry in the GEOS-Chem global model and examine the implications for the global atmospheric Hg budget and deposition patterns. Our simulation includes a new coupling of GEOS-Chem to an ocean general circulation model (MITgcm), enabling a global 3-D representation of atmosphere–ocean Hg0 ∕ HgII cycling. We find that atomic bromine (Br) of marine organobromine origin is the main atmospheric Hg0 oxidant and that second-stage HgBr oxidation is mainly by the NO2 and HO2 radicals. The resulting chemical lifetime of tropospheric Hg0 against oxidation is 2.7 months, shorter than in previous models. Fast HgII atmospheric reduction must occur in order to match the ∼ 6-month lifetime of Hg against deposition implied by the observed atmospheric variability of total gaseous mercury (TGM ≡ Hg0 + HgII(g)). We implement this reduction in GEOS-Chem as photolysis of aqueous-phase HgII–organic complexes in aerosols and clouds, resulting in a TGM lifetime of 5.2 months against deposition and matching both mean observed TGM and its variability. Model sensitivity analysis shows that the interhemispheric gradient of TGM, previously used to infer a longer Hg lifetime against deposition, is misleading because Southern Hemisphere Hg mainly originates from oceanic emissions rather than transport from the Northern Hemisphere. The model reproduces the observed seasonal TGM variation at northern midlatitudes (maximum in February, minimum in September) driven by chemistry and oceanic evasion, but it does not reproduce the lack of seasonality observed at southern hemispheric marine sites. Aircraft observations in the lowermost stratosphere show a strong TGM–ozone relationship indicative of fast Hg0 oxidation, but we show that this relationship provides only a weak test of Hg chemistry because it is also influenced by mixing. The model reproduces observed Hg wet deposition fluxes over North America, Europe, and China with little bias (0–30 %). It reproduces qualitatively the observed maximum in US deposition around the Gulf of Mexico, reflecting a combination of deep convection and availability of NO2 and HO2 radicals for second-stage HgBr oxidation. However, the magnitude of this maximum is underestimated. The relatively low observed Hg wet deposition over rural China is attributed to fast HgII reduction in the presence of high organic aerosol concentrations. We find that 80 % of HgII deposition is to the global oceans, reflecting the marine origin of Br and low concentrations of organic aerosols for HgII reduction. Most of that deposition takes place to the tropical oceans due to the availability of HO2 and NO2 for second-stage HgBr oxidation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., & Schultz, M. G. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd000807 · Cited by 2,486
Self-citationInteractions between mercury and dissolved organic matter––a review
Ravichandran, M. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011 · Cited by 1,254
Arctic springtime depletion of mercury
Schroeder, W. H., Anlauf, K. G., Barrie, L. A., Lu, J. Y., Steffen, A., Schneeberger, D., & Berg, T. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28530 · Cited by 694
Chemistry of OH in remote clouds and its role in the production of formic acid and peroxymonosulfate
Jacob, D. J. (1986) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd091id09p09807 · Cited by 589
Self-citationThe last decade of global anthropogenic sulfur dioxide: 2000–2011 emissions
Klimont, Z., Smith, S. J., & Cofala, J. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014003 · Cited by 575
Tropospheric Halogen Chemistry: Sources, Cycling, and Impacts
Simpson, W. R., Brown, S. S., Saiz-Lopez, A., Thornton, J. A., & von Glasow, R. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5006638 · Cited by 556
Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C., & Koshak, W. J. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2012jd017934 · Cited by 539
Self-citationLINDQVIST, O., & RODHE, H. (1985) · Tellus B · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.1985.tb00062.x · Cited by 510
Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?
Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu, L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016 · Cited by 470
Self-citation
Cited by
A vegetation control on seasonal variations in global atmospheric mercury concentrations
Jiskra, M., Sonke, J. E., Obrist, D., Bieser, J., Ebinghaus, R., Myhre, C. L., Pfaffhuber, K. A., Wängberg, I., Kyllönen, K., Worthy, D., et al. (2018) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0078-8 · Cited by 312
Climate change and overfishing increase neurotoxicant in marine predators
Schartup, A. T., Thackray, C. P., Qureshi, A., Dassuncao, C., Gillespie, K., Hanke, A., & Sunderland, E. M. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1468-9 · Cited by 258
Self-citationThe Magmatic Architecture of Continental Flood Basalts I: Observations From the Deccan Traps
Mittal, T., Richards, M. A., & Fendley, I. M. (2021) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2021jb021808 · Cited by 42
Yue, F., Xie, Z., Zhang, Y., Yan, J., & Zhao, S. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c07229 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Horowitz, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Dibble, T. S., Slemr, F., Amos, H. M., Schmidt, J. A., Corbitt, E. S., Marais, E. A., & Sunderland, E. M.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2017-05-29
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 6353-6371
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2573209781
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 19.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for the global mercury budget. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-17-6353-2017
- The paper
- Horowitz, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Dibble, T. S., Slemr, F., Amos, H. M., Schmidt, J. A., Corbitt, E. S., Marais, E. A., & Sunderland, E. M. (2017). A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for the global mercury budget. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6353-2017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.