The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of organic markers for chemical mass balance source apportionment at the Fresno Supersite
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Sources of PM2.5 at the Fresno Supersite during high PM2.5 episodes occurring from 15 December 2000–3 February 2001 were estimated with the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) receptor model. The ability of source profiles with organic markers to distinguish motor vehicle, residential wood combustion (RWC), and cooking emissions was evaluated with simulated data. Organics improved the distinction between gasoline and diesel vehicle emissions and allowed a more precise estimate of the cooking source contribution. Sensitivity tests using average ambient concentrations showed that the gasoline vehicle contribution was not resolved without organics. Organics were not required to estimate hardwood contributions. The most important RWC marker was the water-soluble potassium ion. The estimated cooking contribution did not depend on cholesterol because its concentrations were below the detection limit in most samples. Winter time source contributions were estimated by applying the CMB model to individual and average sample concentrations. RWC was the largest source, contributing 29–31% of measured PM2.5. Hardwood and softwood combustion accounted for 16–17% and 12–15%, respectively. Secondary ammonium nitrate and motor vehicle emissions accounted for 31–33% and 9–15%, respectively. The gasoline vehicle contribution (3–10%) was comparable to the diesel vehicle contribution (5–6%). The cooking contribution was 5–19% of PM2.5. Fresno source apportionment results were consistent with those estimated in previous studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Source apportionment of particulate matter in Europe: A review of methods and results
Viana, M., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Harrison, R. M., Hopke, P. K., Winiwarter, W., Vallius, M., Szidat, S., Prévôt, A. S. H., et al. (2008) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.05.007 · Cited by 1,011
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Chen, L.-W. A., Chang, M. C. O., Robinson, N. F., Trimble, D., & Kohl, S. (2007) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.9.1014 · Cited by 854
Self-citationMohr, C., Huffman, J. A., Cubison, M. J., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S., Kimmel, J. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Hannigan, M., & Jimenez, J. L. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es8011518 · Cited by 388
Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review
Chow, J. C., Lowenthal, D. H., Chen, L.-W. A., Wang, X., & Watson, J. G. (2015) · Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health · doi:10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3 · Cited by 379
Self-citationTemporal patterns in daily measurements of inorganic and organic speciated PM2.5 in Denver
Dutton, S. J., Rajagopalan, B., Vedal, S., & Hannigan, M. P. (2010) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.006 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Chen, L. W. A., Zielinska, B., Mazzoleni, L. R., & Magliano, K. L.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2007-04-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1741-1754
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2135744048
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of organic markers for chemical mass balance source apportionment at the Fresno Supersite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-7-1741-2007
- The paper
- Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Chen, L. W. A., Zielinska, B., Mazzoleni, L. R., & Magliano, K. L. (2007). Evaluation of organic markers for chemical mass balance source apportionment at the Fresno Supersite. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1741-2007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.