The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract. The Global Fire Assimilation System (GFASv1.0) calculates biomass burning emissions by assimilating Fire Radiative Power (FRP) observations from the MODIS instruments onboard the Terra and Aqua satellites. It corrects for gaps in the observations, which are mostly due to cloud cover, and filters spurious FRP observations of volcanoes, gas flares and other industrial activity. The combustion rate is subsequently calculated with land cover-specific conversion factors. Emission factors for 40 gas-phase and aerosol trace species have been compiled from a literature survey. The corresponding daily emissions have been calculated on a global 0.5° × 0.5° grid from 2003 to the present. General consistency with the Global Fire Emission Database version 3.1 (GFED3.1) within its accuracy is achieved while maintaining the advantages of an FRP-based approach: GFASv1.0 makes use of the quantitative information on the combustion rate that is contained in the FRP observations, and it detects fires in real time at high spatial and temporal resolution. GFASv1.0 indicates omission errors in GFED3.1 due to undetected small fires. It also exhibits slightly longer fire seasons in South America and North Africa and a slightly shorter fire season in Southeast Asia. GFASv1.0 has already been used for atmospheric reactive gas simulations in an independent study, which found good agreement with atmospheric observations. We have performed simulations of the atmospheric aerosol distribution with and without the assimilation of MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD). They indicate that the emissions of particulate matter need to be boosted by a factor of 2–4 to reproduce the global distribution of organic matter and black carbon. This discrepancy is also evident in the comparison of previously published top-down and bottom-up estimates. For the time being, a global enhancement of the particulate matter emissions by 3.4 is recommended. Validation with independent AOD and PM10 observations recorded during the Russian fires in summer 2010 show that the global Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Change (MACC) aerosol model with GFASv1.0 aerosol emissions captures the smoke plume evolution well when organic matter and black carbon are enhanced by the recommended factor. In conjunction with the assimilation of MODIS AOD, the use of GFASv1.0 with enhanced emission factors quantitatively improves the forecast of the aerosol load near the surface sufficiently to allow air quality warnings with a lead time of up to four days.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176
Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning
Andreae, M. O., & Merlet, P. (2001) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001382 · Cited by 3,902
Self-citationBowman, D. M. J. S., Balch, J. K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W. J., Carlson, J. M., Cochrane, M. A., D’Antonio, C. M., DeFries, R. S., Doyle, J. C., Harrison, S. P., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1163886 · Cited by 3,351
Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice
Rodgers, C. D. (2000) · Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics · doi:10.1142/3171 · Cited by 3,057
Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC
Hess, M., Koepke, P., & Schult, I. (1998) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0831:opoaac>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,909
(2010) · doi:10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010 · Cited by 2,859
An emerging ground‐based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET
Holben, B. N., Tanré, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Abuhassan, N., Newcomb, W. W., Schafer, J. S., Chatenet, B., Lavenu, F., et al. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd900014 · Cited by 2,104
Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models
Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., & Wennberg, P. O. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011 · Cited by 2,047
Turpin, B. J., & Lim, H.-J. (2001) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820119445 · Cited by 2,036
Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J. A., Orlando, J. J., & Soja, A. J. (2011) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011 · Cited by 1,850
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Colarco, P.: The NASA {GEOS}-5 Aerosol Forecasting System, in: MACC Conference, Driebergen, The Netherlands, 2011.
- Kaiser, J. W., Schultz, M. G., Gregoire, J. M., Textor, C., Sofiev, M., Bartholome, E., Leroy, M., Engelen, R. J., and Hollingsworth, A.: Observation Requirements for Global Biomass Burning Emission Monitoring, in: Proc. 2006 EUMETSAT Met. Sat. Conf., 2006.
- Wüst, R.: Mathematik für Physiker und Mathematiker, vol. 1: Reelle Analysis und Lineare Algebra, WILEY-VCH GmbH & Co. KGaA, 3. edn., 2009.
Cited by
Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171 · Cited by 6,385
Self-citationThe Global Methane Budget 2000–2017
Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., et al. (2019) · doi:10.5194/essd-2019-128 · Cited by 2,760
The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017
Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., et al. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020 · Cited by 2,711
Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016
(2017) · doi:10.5194/essd-9-697-2017 · Cited by 2,493
The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products
Giglio, L., Schroeder, W., & Justice, C. O. (2016) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.054 · Cited by 1,617
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones, L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., & van der Werf, G. R.
- Venue
- Biogeosciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2012-01-27
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 527-554
- ISSN
- 1726-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1726-4189
- OpenAlex
- W2155039075
- Cited by
- 1,518
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 47.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Funders
- European Commission (218793)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012
- The paper
- Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones, L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., & van der Werf, G. R. (2012). Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power. Biogeosciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.