The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract. By coordinating the design and distribution of global climate model simulations of the past, current and future climate, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) has become one of the foundational elements of climate science. However, the need to address an ever-expanding range of scientific questions arising from more and more research communities has made it necessary to revise the organization of CMIP. After a long and wide community consultation, a new and more federated structure has been put in place. It consists of three major elements: (1) a handful of common experiments, the DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima experiments) and the CMIP Historical Simulation (1850–near-present) that will maintain continuity and help document basic characteristics of models across different phases of CMIP, (2) common standards, coordination, infrastructure and documentation that will facilitate the distribution of model outputs and the characterization of the model ensemble, and (3) an ensemble of CMIP-Endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) that will be specific to a particular phase of CMIP (now CMIP6) and that will build on the DECK and the CMIP Historical Simulation to address a large range of specific questions and fill the scientific gaps of the previous CMIP phases. The DECK and CMIP Historical Simulation, together with the use of CMIP data standards, will be the entry cards for models participating in CMIP. The participation in the CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs will be at the discretion of the modelling groups, and will depend on scientific interests and priorities. With the Grand Science Challenges of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) as its scientific backdrop, CMIP6 will address three broad questions: (i) how does the Earth system respond to forcing?, (ii) what are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases?, and (iii) how can we assess future climate changes given climate variability, predictability and uncertainties in scenarios? This CMIP6 overview paper presents the background and rationale for the new structure of CMIP, provides a detailed description of the DECK and the CMIP6 Historical Simulation, and includes a brief introduction to the 21 CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in CMIP3 and CMIP5, where climate model projections were part of the core experiments, in CMIP6 they are part of a dedicated CMIP6-Endorsed MIP (Eyring et al., 2016).”
From The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 (2016) · cites this paper as Eyring et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The IPCC AR6 statement on ENSO SST variability is contrary to studies 5-7 based on climate models participating in the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 8 (CMIP6).”
From Increased ENSO sea surface temperature variability under four IPCC emission scenarios (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The analysis provides a test of the ability of the corresponding ALL simulations to reproduce the regional trends in annual mean temperature and precipitation against observational data 56 .”
From Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate change 2007: the physical science basis
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Marquis, M. C., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., Miller, H. L., & Chen, Z. (2007) · Cited by 23,398
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
Self-citationThe representative concentration pathways: an overview
van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F., et al. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z · Cited by 7,741
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van Vuuren, D. P., Carter, T. R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08823 · Cited by 6,467
Self-citationAnthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., & Pongratz, J. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.018 · Cited by 4,634
IPCC (2007): Climate Change The Physical Science Basis
Solomon, S. (2007) · AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts · Cited by 3,476
O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., et al. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004 · Cited by 3,359
THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research
Meehl, G., Covey, C., Delworth, T., Latif, M., Mcavaney, B., Mitchell, J., Stouffer, R., & Taylor, K. E. (2007) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-88-9-1383 · Cited by 2,831
Self-citationCauses of Climate Change Over the Past 1000 Years
Crowley, T. J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5477.270 · Cited by 2,068
Change, I. P. O. C. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.020 · Cited by 1,943
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cubasch, U., Wuebbles, D., Chen, D., Facchini, M. C., Frame, D., Mahowald, N., and Winther, J.-G.: Introduction, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,030
Doury, A., Somot, S., Gadat, S., Ribes, A., & Corre, L. (2022) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-022-06343-9 · Cited by 113
Predicted changes in future precipitation and air temperature across Bangladesh using CMIP6 GCMs
Kamruzzaman, M., Wahid, S. M., Shahid, S., Alam, E., Mainuddin, M., Islam, H. M. T., Cho, J., Rahman, M. M., Biswas, J. C., & Thorp, K. R. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16274 · Cited by 86
Digital twins of the Earth with and for humans
Hazeleger, W., Aerts, J., Bauer, P., Bierkens, M. F. P., Camps‐Valls, G., Dekker, M., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Eyring, V., Finkenauer, C., Grundner, A., et al. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01626-x · Cited by 99
Self-citationDisappearing landscapes: The Arctic at +2.7°C global warming
Stroeve, J. C., Notz, D., Dawson, J., Schuur, E. A. G., Dahl‐Jensen, D., & Gieße, C. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ads1549 · Cited by 80
Gerber, E. P., & Manzini, E. (2016) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-3413-2016 · Cited by 87
Zhou, T., Zhang, W., Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Qian, Y., Peng, D., Ma, S., & Dong, B. (2020) · Science China Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11430-019-9613-9 · Cited by 77
Bai, H., Xiao, D., Wang, B., Liu, D. L., Feng, P., & Tang, J. (2020) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.6674 · Cited by 78
Evaluation of the Performance of CMIP6 HighResMIP on West African Precipitation
Ajibola, F. O., Zhou, B., Gnitou, G. T., & Onyejuruwa, A. (2020) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos11101053 · Cited by 77
Kodama, C., Ohno, T., Seiki, T., Yashiro, H., Noda, A., Nakano, M., Yamada, Y., Roh, W., Satoh, M., Nitta, T., et al. (2021) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-14-795-2021 · Cited by 77
Aubry, T. J., Engwell, S., Bonadonna, C., Carazzo, G., Scollo, S., Eaton, A. R. V., Taylor, I. A., Jessop, D. E., Eychenne, J., Gouhier, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107295 · Cited by 79
A novel method for ranking CMIP6 global climate models over the southeast Asian region
Desmet, Q., & Ngo‐Duc, T. (2021) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.7234 · Cited by 77
Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
Zhang, S., & Chen, J. (2021) · 气象学报:英文版 · doi:10.1007/s13351-021-1012-3 · Cited by 77
Engaging with stakeholders to produce actionable science: a framework and guidance
Bamzai‐Dodson, A., Cravens, A. E., Wade, A. A., & McPherson, R. A. (2021) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-21-0046.1 · Cited by 80
Weakening of carbon sink on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
Wu, T., Ma, W., Wu, X., Li, R., Qiao, Y., Li, X., Yue, G., Zhu, X., & Ni, J. (2022) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115707 · Cited by 77
The TRAPPIST-1 Habitable Atmosphere Intercomparison (THAI). II. Moist Cases—The Two Waterworlds
Sergeev, D. E., Fauchez, T. J., Turbet, M., Boutle, I., Tsigaridis, K., Way, M. J., Wolf, E. T., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Forget, F., Haqq-Misra, J. D., et al. (2022) · The Planetary Science Journal · doi:10.3847/psj/ac6cf2 · Cited by 79
The evolution of 21st century sea-level projections from IPCC AR5 to AR6 and beyond
Slangen, A. B. A., Palmer, M. D., Camargo, C. M. L., Church, J. A., Edwards, T., Hermans, T. H. J., Hewitt, H. T., Garner, G. G., Gregory, J. M., Kopp, R. E., et al. (2022) · Cambridge Prisms Coastal Futures · doi:10.1017/cft.2022.8 · Cited by 77
Increasing risk of simultaneous occurrence of flash drought in major global croplands
Mahto, S. S., & Mishra, V. K. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acc8ed · Cited by 83
Tian, Y., Zhao, Y., Son, S., Luo, J., Oh, S., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2022jd037041 · Cited by 78
Ullah, I., Zeng, X., Mukherjee, S., Aadhar, S., Mishra, A. K., Syed, S., Ayugi, B. O., Iyakaremye, V., & Lv, H. (2023) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2023ef003688 · Cited by 77
A species’ response to spatial climatic variation does not predict its response to climate change
Perret, D. L., Evans, M. E. K., & Sax, D. F. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2304404120 · Cited by 77
Rahman, A., & Pekkat, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52275-1 · Cited by 77
Short- and long-term variability of the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets
Hanna, E., Topál, D., Box, J. E., Buzzard, S., Christie, F. D. W., Hvidberg, C. S., Morlighem, M., Santis, L. D., Silvano, A., Colleoni, F., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00509-7 · Cited by 124
Zhang, K., Fang, B., Zhang, Z., Liu, T., & Liu, K. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171630 · Cited by 77
Observationally constrained projection of Afro-Asian monsoon precipitation
Chen, Z., Zhou, T., Chen, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, L., Wu, M., & Zou, L. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30106-z · Cited by 88
Contrasting Fate of Western Third Pole's Water Resources Under 21st Century Climate Change
Su, F., Pritchard, H. D., Yao, T., Huang, J., Ou, T., Meng, F., Sun, H., Li, Y., Xu, B., Zhu, M., et al. (2022) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef002776 · Cited by 76
Merrifield, A. L., Brunner, L., Lorenz, R., Humphrey, V., & Knutti, R. (2023) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-16-4715-2023 · Cited by 76
Rapid attribution of the record-breaking heatwave event in North China in June 2023 and future risks
Qian, C., Ye, Y., Jiang, J., Zhong, Y., Zhang, Y., Pinto, I., Huang, C., Li, S., & Wei, K. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad0dd9 · Cited by 79
Why Do Models Produce Spread in Snow Albedo Feedback?
Thackeray, C. W., Qu, X., & Hall, A. D. (2018) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2018gl078493 · Cited by 80
Sensitivity of Marine Heatwave Metrics to Ocean Model Resolution
Pilo, G. S., Holbrook, N. J., Kiss, A. E., & Hogg, A. M. (2019) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2019gl084928 · Cited by 83
Assessment of pre-industrial to present-day anthropogenic climate forcing in UKESM1
O’Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C. J., Johnson, B. T. T., Kahana, R., Keeble, J., Kim, B., et al. (2021) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-21-1211-2021 · Cited by 83
Assessment of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance for extreme temperature in China
Luo, N., Guo, Y., Gao, Z., Kexin, C. H. E. N., & Chou, J. (2020) · Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters · doi:10.1080/16742834.2020.1808430 · Cited by 73
Evaluation of extreme sub-daily precipitation in high-resolution global climate model simulations
Wehner, M. F., Lee, J., Risser, M. D., Ullrich, P. A., Gleckler, P. J., & Collins, W. D. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0545 · Cited by 75
Biastoch, A., Schwarzkopf, F. U., Getzlaff, K., Rühs, S., Martin, T., Scheinert, M., Schulzki, T., Handmann, P., Hummels, R., & Böning, C. W. (2021) · Ocean science · doi:10.5194/os-17-1177-2021 · Cited by 85
Soil organic carbon dynamics from agricultural management practices under climate change
Herzfeld, T., Heinke, J., Rolinski, S., & Müller, C. (2021) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-12-1037-2021 · Cited by 92
High‐resolution mapping of the global silicate weathering carbon sink and its long‐term changes
Li, C., Bai, X., Tan, Q., Luo, G., Wu, L., Chen, F., Xi, H., Luo, X., Chen, R., Chen, H., et al. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16186 · Cited by 76
Robust increase in population exposure to heat stress with increasing global warming
Freychet, N., Hegerl, G. C., Lord, N. S., Lo, Y. T. E., Mitchell, D., & Collins, M. D. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b9 · Cited by 75
CMIP5 and CMIP6 Model Projection Comparison for Hydrological Impacts Over North America
Martel, J., Brissette, F. P., Troin, M., Arsenault, R., Chen, J., Su, T., & Lucas‐Picher, P. (2022) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2022gl098364 · Cited by 75
Florêncio, G. W. L., Martins, F. B., & Fagundes, F. F. A. (2022) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115538 · Cited by 75
Projected Changes in Increased Drought Risks Over South Asia Under a Warmer Climate
Ullah, I., Ma, X., Asfaw, T. G., Yin, J., Iyakaremye, V., Saleem, F., Xing, Y., Azam, K., & Syed, S. (2022) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef002830 · Cited by 75
Nonlinear El Niño impacts on the global economy under climate change
Liu, Y., Cai, W., Lin, X., Li, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41551-9 · Cited by 82
Overshooting the critical threshold for the Greenland ice sheet
Bochow, N., Poltronieri, A., Robinson, A., Montoya, M., Rypdal, M. W., & Boers, N. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06503-9 · Cited by 82
Kumar, R., Kuttippurath, J., Gopikrishnan, G. P., Kumar, P., & Varikoden, H. (2023) · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science · doi:10.1038/s41612-023-00494-0 · Cited by 82
Swapna, P., Krishnan, R., Sandeep, N., Prajeesh, A. G., Ayantika, D. C., Manmeet, S., & Vellore, R. K. (2018) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2017ms001262 · Cited by 74
Amplified Madden–Julian oscillation impacts in the Pacific–North America region
Zhou, W., Yang, D., Xie, S., & Ma, J. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0814-0 · Cited by 74
Climate Perspectives in the Intra–Americas Seas
Durán‐Quesada, A. M., Sorí, R., Ordóñez, P., & Gimeno, L. (2020) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos11090959 · Cited by 80
Seong, M., Min, S., Kim, Y., Zhang, X., & Sun, Y. (2020) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-1023.1 · Cited by 75
Improved atmospheric circulation over Europe by the new generation of CMIP6 earth system models
Fernández-Granja, J. A., Casanueva, A., Bedia, J., & Fernández, J. (2021) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-021-05652-9 · Cited by 82
Earth System Models Are Not Capturing Present‐Day Tropical Forest Carbon Dynamics
Koch, A., Hubau, W., & Lewis, S. L. (2021) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2020ef001874 · Cited by 78
Southern Ocean polynyas in CMIP6 models
Mohrmann, M., Heuzé, C., & Swart, S. (2021) · The Cryosphere · doi:10.5194/tc-15-4281-2021 · Cited by 74
Reducing uncertainty in local temperature projections
Qasmi, S., & Ribes, A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo6872 · Cited by 82
Observed variability and trends in global precipitation during 1979–2020
Gu, G., & Adler, R. F. (2022) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-022-06567-9 · Cited by 74
Sun, P., Zou, Y., Yao, R., Ma, Z., Bian, Y., Ge, C., & Lv, Y. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162980 · Cited by 77
Climate Model Code Genealogy and Its Relation to Climate Feedbacks and Sensitivity
Kuma, P., Bender, F. A. ‐., & Jönsson, A. R. (2023) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2022ms003588 · Cited by 98
Recent human-induced atmospheric drying across Europe unprecedented in the last 400 years
Treydte, K. S., Liu, L., Padrón, R. S., Martínez‐Sancho, E., Babst, F., Frank, D., Geßler, A., Kahmen, A., Poulter, B., Seneviratne, S. I., et al. (2023) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-023-01335-8 · Cited by 76
Chen, X., & Dai, A. (2024) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2023ef003734 · Cited by 77
Interdependency in Multimodel Climate Projections: Component Replication and Result Similarity
Boé, J. (2018) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl076829 · Cited by 80
Spin‐up of UK Earth System Model 1 (UKESM1) for CMIP6
Yool, A., Palmiéri, J., Jones, C., Sellar, A., de Mora, L., Kuhlbrodt, T., Popova, E. E., Mulcahy, J. P., Wiltshire, A. J., Rumbold, S. T., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001933 · Cited by 76
The extremely warm summer of 2018 in Sweden – set in a historical context
Wilcke, R., Kjellström, E., Lin, C.-G., Matei, D., Moberg, A., & Tyrlis, E. (2020) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-11-1107-2020 · Cited by 55
Introduction to Climate Change Over the Indian Region
Krishnan, R., Gnanaseelan, C., Sanjay, J., Swapna, P., Dhara, C., Sabin, T. P., Jadhav, J., Sandeep, N., Choudhury, A. D., Singh, M., et al. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4327-2_1 · Cited by 73
Evaluating the Performance of Climate Models Based on Wasserstein Distance
Vissio, G., Lembo, V., Lucarini, V., & Ghil, M. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl089385 · Cited by 73
Rajendran, K., Surendran, S., Varghese, S. J., & Sathyanath, A. (2021) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-021-06027-w · Cited by 77
Dong, J., Lei, F., & Crow, W. T. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27938-6 · Cited by 84
Emergence of climate change in the tropical Pacific
Ying, J., Collins, M. D., Cai, W., Timmermann, A., Huang, P., Chen, D., & Stein, K. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01301-z · Cited by 75
Antarctic sea-ice expansion and Southern Ocean cooling linked to tropical variability
Chung, E., Kim, S., Timmermann, A., Ha, K., Lee, S., Stuecker, M. F., Rodgers, K. B., Lee, S., & Huang, L. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01339-z · Cited by 75
Robson, J. I., Menary, M. B., Sutton, R. T., Mecking, J., Gregory, J. M., Jones, C., Sinha, B., Stevens, D. P., & Wilcox, L. J. (2022) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-22-0124.1 · Cited by 78
Divergence in Climate Model Projections of Future Arctic Atlantification
Muilwijk, M., Nummelin, A., Heuzé, C., Polyakov, I. V., Zanowski, H., & Smedsrud, L. H. (2022) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-22-0349.1 · Cited by 73
Wu, F., Jiao, D., Yang, X., Cui, Z., Zhang, H., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Hydrology research · doi:10.2166/nh.2023.140 · Cited by 73
Transition from positive to negative indirect CO2 effects on the vegetation carbon uptake
Chen, Z., Wang, W., Forzieri, G., & Cescatti, A. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45957-x · Cited by 79
Dual impact of global urban overheating on mortality
Wang, S., Zhan, W., Zhou, B., Tong, S., Chakraborty, T., Wang, Z., Huang, K., Du, H., Middel, A., Li, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02303-3 · Cited by 82
Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10)
Mengis, N., Keller, D. P., MacDougall, A. H., Eby, M., Wright, N., Meißner, K. J., Oschlies, A., Schmittner, A., MacIsaac, A., Matthews, H. D., et al. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-4183-2020 · Cited by 72
CMIP6 MultiModel Evaluation of Present‐Day Heatwave Attributes
Hirsch, A. L., Ridder, N., Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E., & Ukkola, A. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2021gl095161 · Cited by 82
Keller, A. A., Garner, K. L., Rao, N., Knipping, E., & Thomas, J. A. (2022) · PLOS Water · doi:10.1371/journal.pwat.0000046 · Cited by 76
Climate Change Determines Future Population Exposure to Summertime Compound Dry and Hot Events
Zhang, G., Wang, H., Gan, T. Y., Zhang, S., Shi, L., Zhao, J., Su, X., & Song, S. (2022) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef003015 · Cited by 76
Significantly wetter or drier future conditions for one to two thirds of the world’s population
Trancoso, R., Syktus, J. I., Allan, R. P., Croke, J. C., Hoegh‐Guldberg, O., & Chadwick, R. S. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44513-3 · Cited by 87
Lipscomb, W. H., Leguy, G., Jourdain, N. C., Asay‐Davis, X., Seroussi, H. L., & Nowicki, S. (2021) · The Cryosphere · doi:10.5194/tc-15-633-2021 · Cited by 71
Maher, N., Power, S. B., & Marotzke, J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20635-w · Cited by 80
KrigR—a tool for downloading and statistically downscaling climate reanalysis data
Kusch, E., & Davy, R. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac48b3 · Cited by 70
Assessing Biases and Climate Implications of the Diurnal Precipitation Cycle in Climate Models
Christopoulos, C., & Schneider, T. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2021gl093017 · Cited by 71
Robust Evaluation of ENSO in Climate Models: How Many Ensemble Members Are Needed?
Lee, J., Planton, Y. Y., Gleckler, P. J., Sperber, K. R., Guilyardi, É., Wittenberg, A. T., McPhaden, M. J., & Pallotta, G. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2021gl095041 · Cited by 77
Seamless Integration of the Coastal Ocean in Global Marine Carbon Cycle Modeling
Mathis, M., Logemann, K., Maerz, J., Lacroix, F. K. M., Hagemann, S., Chegini, F., Ramme, L., Ilyina, T., Korn, P., & Schrum, C. (2022) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2021ms002789 · Cited by 80
Hamed, M. M., Nashwan, M. S., Shiru, M. S., & Shahid, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141610375 · Cited by 72
Evaluation of CMIP6 GCMs performance to simulate precipitation over Southeast Asia
Pimonsree, S., Kamworapan, S., Gheewala, S. H., Thongbhakdi, A., & Prueksakorn, K. (2022) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106522 · Cited by 71
Coextinctions dominate future vertebrate losses from climate and land use change
Strona, G., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn4345 · Cited by 78
A multiyear tropical Pacific cooling response to recent Australian wildfires in CESM2
Fasullo, J., Rosenbloom, N. A., & Buchholz, R. R. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg1213 · Cited by 75
Quilcaille, Y., Batıbeniz, F., Ribeiro, A. F. S., Padrón, R. S., & Seneviratne, S. I. (2023) · Earth system science data · doi:10.5194/essd-15-2153-2023 · Cited by 80
Hydro-pedotransfer functions: a roadmap for future development
Weber, T. K. D., Weihermüller, L., Nemes, A., Bechtold, M., Degré, A., Diamantopoulos, E., Fatichi, S., Filipović, V., Gupta, S., Hohenbrink, T. L., et al. (2024) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024 · Cited by 76
Rettie, F. M., Gayler, S., Weber, T. K. D., Tesfaye, K., & Streck, T. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02337-2 · Cited by 77
The German Climate Forecast System: GCFS
Fröhlich, K., Dobrynin, M., Isensee, K., Gessner, C., Paxian, A., Pohlmann, H., Helmuth Haak, G., Brune, S., Früh, B., & Baehr, J. (2021) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2020ms002101 · Cited by 70
CAS FGOALS-f3-L model dataset descriptions for CMIP6 DECK experiments
He, B., Yu, Y., Bao, Q., Lin, P., Liu, H., Li, J., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Wu, G., Chen, K., et al. (2020) · Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters · doi:10.1080/16742834.2020.1778419 · Cited by 70
Liu, S., Shi, H., & Sivakumar, B. (2020) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2020jd033005 · Cited by 70
Global River Discharge and Floods in the Warmer Climate of the Last Interglacial
Scussolini, P., Eilander, D., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Ikeuchi, H., Hoch, J. M., Ward, P. J., Bakker, P., Otto‐Bliesner, B. L., Guo, C., Stepanek, C., et al. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl089375 · Cited by 70
Carbon Cycle Response to Temperature Overshoot Beyond 2°C: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models
Melnikova, I., Boucher, O., Cadule, P., Ciais, P., Gasser, T., Quilcaille, Y., Shiogama, H., Tachiiri, K., Yokohata, T., & Tanaka, K. (2021) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2020ef001967 · Cited by 46
Baker, J. C. A., de Souza, D. C., Kubota, P. Y., Wolfgang Buermann, A., Coelho, C. A. S., Andrews, M. B., Gloor, M. U., Garcia‐Carreras, L., Figueroa, S. N., & Spracklen, D. V. (2021) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-20-0132.1 · Cited by 72
Du, Y., Dong, X., Jiang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhu, D., Sun, Q., Wang, Z., Niu, X., Chen, W., Zhu, C., et al. (2021) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102531 · Cited by 71
Metrics for evaluating tropical cyclones in climate data
Zarzycki, C. M., Ullrich, P. A., & Reed, K. A. (2021) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/jamc-d-20-0149.1 · Cited by 78
Multi-Decadal Variability and Future Changes in Precipitation over Southern Africa
Sian, K. T. C. L. K., Wang, J., Ayugi, B. O., Nooni, I. K., & Ongoma, V. (2021) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos12060742 · Cited by 73
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J., Williams, P., Marvel, K., Smerdon, J. E., & Liu, H. (2021) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2021ef002014 · Cited by 79
Monerie, P., Wilcox, L. J., & Turner, A. G. (2022) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-21-0412.1 · Cited by 70
Climate Scenarios for Switzerland CH2018 – Approach and Implications
Fischer, A. M., Strassmann, K., Croci‐Maspoli, M., Hama, A. M., Knutti, R., Kotlarski, S., Schär, C., Schnadt, C., Ban, N., Bavay, M., et al. (2022) · Climate Services · doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100288 · Cited by 70
Rahif, R., Norouziasas, A., Elnagar, E., Doutreloup, S., Pourkiaei, S. M., Amaripadath, D., Romain, A.-C., Fettweis, X., & Attia, S. (2022) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109397 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E.
- Affiliations
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
- Met Office (GB)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eyring, Veronika
- ORCID
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2016-05-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1937-1958
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W2193503481
- Cited by
- 11,981
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1479 · 2025: 2008 · 2024: 2052 · 2023: 1974 · 2022: 1839 · 2021: 1479 · 2020: 680 · 2019: 194 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 40
- FWCI
- 114.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoscientific model development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy (DEFC0297ER62402, FC02-97ER62402)
- National Center for Atmospheric Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- CMIP6, CMIP, natural climate variability, climate predictability, climate change assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review