The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract. By coordinating the design and distribution of global climate model simulations of the past, current and future climate, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) has become one of the foundational elements of climate science. However, the need to address an ever-expanding range of scientific questions arising from more and more research communities has made it necessary to revise the organization of CMIP. After a long and wide community consultation, a new and more federated structure has been put in place. It consists of three major elements: (1) a handful of common experiments, the DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima experiments) and the CMIP Historical Simulation (1850–near-present) that will maintain continuity and help document basic characteristics of models across different phases of CMIP, (2) common standards, coordination, infrastructure and documentation that will facilitate the distribution of model outputs and the characterization of the model ensemble, and (3) an ensemble of CMIP-Endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) that will be specific to a particular phase of CMIP (now CMIP6) and that will build on the DECK and the CMIP Historical Simulation to address a large range of specific questions and fill the scientific gaps of the previous CMIP phases. The DECK and CMIP Historical Simulation, together with the use of CMIP data standards, will be the entry cards for models participating in CMIP. The participation in the CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs will be at the discretion of the modelling groups, and will depend on scientific interests and priorities. With the Grand Science Challenges of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) as its scientific backdrop, CMIP6 will address three broad questions: (i) how does the Earth system respond to forcing?, (ii) what are the origins and consequences of systematic model biases?, and (iii) how can we assess future climate changes given climate variability, predictability and uncertainties in scenarios? This CMIP6 overview paper presents the background and rationale for the new structure of CMIP, provides a detailed description of the DECK and the CMIP6 Historical Simulation, and includes a brief introduction to the 21 CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in CMIP3 and CMIP5, where climate model projections were part of the core experiments, in CMIP6 they are part of a dedicated CMIP6-Endorsed MIP (Eyring et al., 2016).”
From The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 (2016) · cites this paper as Eyring et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The IPCC AR6 statement on ENSO SST variability is contrary to studies 5-7 based on climate models participating in the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 8 (CMIP6).”
From Increased ENSO sea surface temperature variability under four IPCC emission scenarios (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The analysis provides a test of the ability of the corresponding ALL simulations to reproduce the regional trends in annual mean temperature and precipitation against observational data 56 .”
From Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate change 2007: the physical science basis
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Marquis, M. C., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., Miller, H. L., & Chen, Z. (2007) · Cited by 23,398
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
Self-citationThe representative concentration pathways: an overview
van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F., et al. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z · Cited by 7,741
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van Vuuren, D. P., Carter, T. R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08823 · Cited by 6,467
Self-citationAnthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., & Pongratz, J. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.018 · Cited by 4,634
IPCC (2007): Climate Change The Physical Science Basis
Solomon, S. (2007) · AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts · Cited by 3,476
O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., et al. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004 · Cited by 3,359
THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research
Meehl, G., Covey, C., Delworth, T., Latif, M., Mcavaney, B., Mitchell, J., Stouffer, R., & Taylor, K. E. (2007) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-88-9-1383 · Cited by 2,831
Self-citationCauses of Climate Change Over the Past 1000 Years
Crowley, T. J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5477.270 · Cited by 2,068
Change, I. P. O. C. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.020 · Cited by 1,943
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cubasch, U., Wuebbles, D., Chen, D., Facchini, M. C., Frame, D., Mahowald, N., and Winther, J.-G.: Introduction, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,030
Big Data in Earth system science and progress towards a digital twin
Li, X., Feng, M., Ran, Y., Su, Y., Liu, F., Huang, C., Shen, H., Xiao, Q., Su, J., Yuan, S., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00409-w · Cited by 291
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report
Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., et al. (2020) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2020.034 · Cited by 239
Historical Simulations With HadGEM3‐GC3.1 for CMIP6
Andrews, M. B., Ridley, J., Wood, R., Andrews, T., Blockley, E., Booth, B. B. B., Burke, E., Dittus, A. J., Florek, P., Gray, L. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001995 · Cited by 281
The NUIST Earth System Model (NESM) version 3: description and preliminary evaluation
Cao, J. F., Wang, B., Yang, Y., Ma, L., Li, J., Sun, B., Bao, Y., He, J., Zhou, X., & Wu, L. (2018) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-2975-2018 · Cited by 256
UK Global Ocean GO6 and GO7: a traceable hierarchy of model resolutions
Storkey, D., Blaker, A. T., Mathiot, P., Megann, A. P., Aksenov, Y., Blockley, E., Calvert, D., Graham, T. R., Hewitt, H. T., Hyder, P., et al. (2018) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-3187-2018 · Cited by 282
Jiang, D., Hu, D., Tian, Z., & Lang, X. (2020) · Advances in Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00376-020-2034-y · Cited by 256
Evidence and attribution of the enhanced land carbon sink
Ruehr, S., Keenan, T. F., Williams, C. A., Zhou, Y., Lu, X., Bastos, A., Canadell, J. G., Prentice, I. C., Sitch, S. A., & Terrer, C. (2023) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00456-3 · Cited by 274
Evaluation of historical CMIP6 model simulations of extreme precipitation over contiguous US regions
Srivastava, A., Grotjahn, R., & Ullrich, P. A. (2020) · Weather and Climate Extremes · doi:10.1016/j.wace.2020.100268 · Cited by 266
Global Land Monsoon Precipitation Changes in CMIP6 Projections
Chen, Z., Zhou, T., Zhang, L., Chen, X., Zhang, W., & Jiang, J. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2019gl086902 · Cited by 252
Key determinants of global land-use projections
Stehfest, E., van Zeist, W.-J., Valin, H., Havlik, P., Popp, A., Kyle, P., Tabeau, A., Mason-D’Croz, D., Hasegawa, T., Bodirsky, B. L., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09945-w · Cited by 247
The impacts of rising vapour pressure deficit in natural and managed ecosystems
Novick, K. A., Ficklin, D. L., Grossiord, C., Konings, A. G., Martínez‐Vilalta, J., Sadok, W., Trugman, A. T., Williams, P., Wright, A. J., Abatzoglou, J. T., et al. (2024) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.14846 · Cited by 294
Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies
Callaghan, M., Schleussner, C.-F., Nath, S., Lejeune, Q., Knutson, T. R., Reichstein, M., Hansen, G., Theokritoff, E., Andrijevic, M., Brecha, R. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01168-6 · Cited by 251
Indian summer monsoon: Extreme events, historical changes, and role of anthropogenic forcings
Singh, D., Ghosh, S., Roxy, M. K., & McDermid, S. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.571 · Cited by 256
Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 midHolocene simulations
Brierley, C., Zhao, A., Harrison, S. P., Braconnot, P., Williams, C. J. R., Thornalley, D., Shi, X., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Ohgaito, R., Kaufman, D. S., et al. (2020) · Climate of the past · doi:10.5194/cp-16-1847-2020 · Cited by 275
Antarctic Bottom Water and North Atlantic Deep Water in CMIP6 models
Heuzé, C. (2021) · Ocean science · doi:10.5194/os-17-59-2021 · Cited by 248
The generation of gridded emissions data for CMIP6
Feng, L., Smith, S. J., Braun, C. J., Crippa, M., Gidden, M., Hoesly, R., Klimont, Z., van Marle, M., van den Berg, M., & van der Werf, G. R. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-461-2020 · Cited by 274
Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations
Mulcahy, J. P., Johnson, C. E., Jones, C., Povey, A. C., Scott, C. E., Sellar, A., Turnock, S. T., Woodhouse, M. T., Abraham, N. L., Andrews, M. B., et al. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020 · Cited by 282
Observational constraints on low cloud feedback reduce uncertainty of climate sensitivity
Myers, T. A., Scott, R. C., Zelinka, M. D., Klein, S. A., Norris, J. R., & Caldwell, P. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01039-0 · Cited by 247
Evaluating Climate Models with the CLIVAR 2020 ENSO Metrics Package
Planton, Y. Y., Guilyardi, E., Wittenberg, A. T., Lee, J., Gleckler, P. J., Bayr, T., McGregor, S., McPhaden, M. J., Power, S., Roehrig, R., et al. (2021) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-19-0337.1 · Cited by 246
Quantifying Progress Across Different CMIP Phases With the ESMValTool
Bock, L., Lauer, A., Schlund, M., Barreiro, M., Bellouin, N., Jones, C., Meehl, G. A., Predoi, V., Roberts, M. J., & Eyring, V. (2020) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2019jd032321 · Cited by 246
Self-citationCompiled records of carbon isotopes in atmospheric CO 2 for historical simulations in CMIP6
Graven, H., Allison, C. E., Etheridge, D. M., Hammer, S., Keeling, R. F., Levin, I., Meijer, H. A. J., Rubino, M., Tans, P. P., Trudinger, C. M., et al. (2017) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-10-4405-2017 · Cited by 270
Regional Climate Sensitivity of Climate Extremes in CMIP6 Versus CMIP5 Multimodel Ensembles
Seneviratne, S. I., & Hauser, M. (2020) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2019ef001474 · Cited by 242
Artificial intelligence reconstructs missing climate information
Kadow, C., Hall, D. M., & Ulbrich, U. (2020) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-020-0582-5 · Cited by 242
Yazdandoost, F., Moradian, S., Izadi, A., & AghaKouchak, A. (2020) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105369 · Cited by 242
Abyssal ocean overturning slowdown and warming driven by Antarctic meltwater
Li, Q., England, M. H., Hogg, A. M., Rintoul, S. R., & Morrison, A. K. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05762-w · Cited by 241
Future changes in precipitation over Central Asia based on CMIP6 projections
Jiang, J., Zhou, T., Chen, X., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab7d03 · Cited by 239
An Overview of the Extratropical Storm Tracks in CMIP6 Historical Simulations
Priestley, M. D. K., Ackerley, D., Catto, J. L., Hodges, K. I., McDonald, R. E., & Lee, R. W. (2020) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-0928.1 · Cited by 239
Rasp, S., & Thuerey, N. (2021) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2020ms002405 · Cited by 276
Global supply chains amplify economic costs of future extreme heat risk
Sun, Y., Zhu, S., Wang, D., Duan, J., Lu, H. M., Yin, H., Tan, C., Zhang, L., Zhao, M., Cai, W., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07147-z · Cited by 274
Mills, M. J., Richter, J. H., Tilmes, S., Kravitz, B., MacMartin, D. G., Glanville, A. A., Tribbia, J. J., Lamarque, J., Vitt, F. M., Schmidt, A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2017jd027006 · Cited by 258
Davini, P., & D’Andrea, F. (2020) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-0862.1 · Cited by 252
Improved Aerosol Processes and Effective Radiative Forcing in HadGEM3 and UKESM1
Mulcahy, J. P., Jones, C., Sellar, A., Johnson, B. T. T., Boutle, I., Jones, A., Andrews, T., Rumbold, S. T., Mollard, J., Bellouin, N., et al. (2018) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2018ms001464 · Cited by 265
Simulations for CMIP6 With the AWI Climate Model AWI‐CM‐1‐1
Semmler, T., Danilov, S. D., Gierz, P., Goessling, H., Hegewald, J., Hinrichs, C., Koldunov, N., Khosravi, N., Mu, L., Rackow, T., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms002009 · Cited by 243
Uncertain response of ocean biological carbon export in a changing world
Henson, S., Laufkötter, C., Leung, S. W., Giering, S. L. C., Palevsky, H. I., & Cavan, E. L. (2022) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-022-00927-0 · Cited by 269
Projected Changes in Climate Extremes Using CMIP6 Simulations Over SREX Regions
Almazroui, M., Saeed, F., Saeed, S., Ismail, M., Ehsan, M. A., Islam, M. N., Abid, M. A., O'Brien, E. W., Kamil, S., Rashid, I. U., et al. (2021) · Earth Systems and Environment · doi:10.1007/s41748-021-00250-5 · Cited by 232
Zhang, Y., & Steiner, A. L. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28764-0 · Cited by 233
Advancing the mechanistic understanding of the priming effect on soil organic matter mineralisation
Bernard, L., Basile‐Doelsch, I., Derrien, D., Fanin, N., Fontaine, S., Guenet, B., Karimi, B., Marsden, C., & Maron, P. (2022) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.14038 · Cited by 267
Khanal, S., Lutz, A., Kraaijenbrink, P., van den Hurk, B., Yao, T., & Immerzeel, W. W. (2021) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2020wr029266 · Cited by 236
Temperature dataset of CMIP6 models over China: evaluation, trend and uncertainty
You, Q., Cai, Z., Wu, F., Jiang, Z., Pepin, N., & Shen, S. S. P. (2021) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-021-05691-2 · Cited by 230
Atmospheric CO2 during the Mid-Piacenzian Warm Period and the M2 glaciation
de la Vega, E., Chalk, T. B., Wilson, P. A., Bysani, R. P., & Foster, G. L. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67154-8 · Cited by 228
Zanchettin, D., Khodri, M., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Schmidt, A., Gerber, E. P., Hegerl, G. C., Robock, A. D., Pausata, F. S. R., Ball, W. T., et al. (2016) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016 · Cited by 248
Biomass burning aerosols in most climate models are too absorbing
Brown, H., Liu, X., Pokhrel, R. P., Murphy, S. M., Lu, Z., Saleh, R., Mielonen, T., Kokkola, H., Bergman, T., Myhre, G., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9 · Cited by 252
Future reversal of warming-enhanced vegetation productivity in the Northern Hemisphere
Zhang, Y., Piao, S. L., Sun, Y., Rogers, B. M., Li, X., Lian, X., Liu, Z., Chen, A., & Peñuelas, J. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01374-w · Cited by 238
Diverging future surface mass balance between the Antarctic ice shelves and grounded ice sheet
Kittel, C., Amory, C., Agosta, C., Jourdain, N. C., Hofer, S., Delhasse, A., Doutreloup, S., Huot, P.-V., Lang, C., Fichefet, T., et al. (2021) · The Cryosphere · doi:10.5194/tc-15-1215-2021 · Cited by 250
Roberts, C. D., Senan, R., Molteni, F., Boussetta, S., Mayer, M., & Keeley, S. P. E. (2018) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-3681-2018 · Cited by 225
Business risk and the emergence of climate analytics
Fiedler, T., Pitman, A. J., Mackenzie, K., Wood, N., Jakob, C., & Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00984-6 · Cited by 248
Globally unequal effect of extreme heat on economic growth
Callahan, C. W., & Mankin, J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.add3726 · Cited by 233
Carbon emissions from the 2023 Canadian wildfires
Byrne, B., Liu, J., Bowman, K. W., Pascolini‐Campbell, M., Chatterjee, A., Pandey, S., Miyazaki, K., van der Werf, G. R., Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07878-z · Cited by 276
Global land use for 2015–2100 at 0.05° resolution under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios
Chen, M., Vernon, C., Graham, N. T., Hejazi, M. I., Huang, M., Cheng, Y., & Calvin, K. (2020) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00669-x · Cited by 226
Expansion of Coccidioidomycosis Endemic Regions in the United States in Response to Climate Change
Gorris, M. E., Treseder, K. K., Zender, C. S., & Randerson, J. T. (2019) · GeoHealth · doi:10.1029/2019gh000209 · Cited by 234
Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles
Whelan, M., Lennartz, S. T., Gimeno, T. E., Wehr, R. A., Wohlfahrt, G., Wang, Y., Kooijmans, L. M. J., Hilton, T. W., Belviso, S., Peylin, P., et al. (2018) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018 · Cited by 222
Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K., Faluvegi, G., Kelley, M., Lo, K. K., Miller, R. L., Nazarenko, L., Schmidt, G. A., & Wu, J. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001978 · Cited by 222
Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over East Africa
Ayugi, B. O., Zhihong, J., Zhu, H., Ngoma, H., Babaousmail, H., Karim, R., & Dike, V. N. (2021) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.7207 · Cited by 225
Burke, E., Zhang, Y., & Krinner, G. (2020) · The Cryosphere · doi:10.5194/tc-14-3155-2020 · Cited by 220
Global exposure to flooding from the new CMIP6 climate model projections
Hirabayashi, Y., Tanoue, M., Sasaki, O., Zhou, X., & Yamazaki, D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83279-w · Cited by 242
Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss
Smith, D. M., Eade, R., Andrews, M. B., Ayres, H., Clark, A., Chripko, S., Deser, C., Dunstone, N., García‐Serrano, J., Gastineau, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y · Cited by 234
Meeting User Needs for Sea Level Rise Information: A Decision Analysis Perspective
Hinkel, J., Church, J. A., Gregory, J. M., Lambert, E., Cozannet, G. L., Lowe, J. A., McInnes, K. L., Nicholls, R. J., van der Pol, T., & van de Wal, R. S. W. (2019) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2018ef001071 · Cited by 229
The global energy balance as represented in CMIP6 climate models
Wild, M. (2020) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-020-05282-7 · Cited by 218
Haarsma, R., Acosta, M., Bakhshi, R., Bretonnière, P.-A., Caron, L., Castrillo, M., Corti, S., Davini, P., Exarchou, E., Fabiano, F., et al. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-3507-2020 · Cited by 240
Volcanic Radiative Forcing From 1979 to 2015
Schmidt, A., Mills, M. J., Ghan, S. J., Gregory, J. M., Allan, R. P., Andrews, T., Bardeen, C., Conley, A., Forster, P. M. D. F., Gettelman, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2018jd028776 · Cited by 216
Evaluation of CMIP6 GCM rainfall in mainland Southeast Asia
Iqbal, Z., Shahid, S., Ahmed, K., Ismail, T., Ziarh, G. F., Chung, ., & Wang, X. (2021) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105525 · Cited by 215
McKenna, R., Pfenninger, S., Heinrichs, H., Schmidt, J., Staffell, I., Bauer, C., Gruber, K., Hahmann, A. N., Jansen, M., Klingler, M., et al. (2021) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027 · Cited by 244
Bevacqua, E., Schleussner, C., & Jakob Zscheischler, A. (2025) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02246-9 · Cited by 215
Shao, R., Zhang, B., Su, T., Long, B., Cheng, L., Xue, Y., & Yang, W. (2019) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2019jd031295 · Cited by 217
Ullrich, P. A., Zarzycki, C. M., McClenny, E. E., Pinheiro, M. C., Stansfield, A. M., & Reed, K. A. (2021) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-14-5023-2021 · Cited by 261
The COVID-19 lockdowns: a window into the Earth System
Diffenbaugh, N. S., Field, C. B., Appel, E. A., Azevedo, I. L., Baldocchi, D., Burke, M., Burney, J. A., Ciais, P., Davis, S. J., Fiore, A. M., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-020-0079-1 · Cited by 216
Simulations With the Marine Biogeochemistry Library (MARBL)
Long, M. C., Moore, J. K., Lindsay, K., Levy, M. N., Doney, S. C., Luo, J. Y., Krumhardt, K. M., Letscher, R. T., Grover, M. A., & Sylvester, Z. T. (2021) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2021ms002647 · Cited by 235
Future changes in the extratropical storm tracks and cyclone intensity, wind speed, and structure
Priestley, M. D. K., & Catto, J. L. (2022) · Weather and Climate Dynamics · doi:10.5194/wcd-3-337-2022 · Cited by 211
Beamish, A., Raynolds, M. K., Epstein, H. E., Frost, G. V., Macander, M. J., Bergstedt, H., Bartsch, A., Kruse, S., Miles, V., Taniş, C. M., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111872 · Cited by 223
Why super sandstorm 2021 in North China?
Yin, Z., Wan, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2021) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwab165 · Cited by 219
Stevens, B., Fiedler, S., Kinne, S., Peters, K., Rast, S., Müsse, J., Smith, S. J., & Mauritsen, T. (2017) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-10-433-2017 · Cited by 222
Self-citationThe Added Value of Large-eddy and Storm-resolving Models for Simulating Clouds and Precipitation
Stevens, B., Acquistapace, C., Hansen, A., Heinze, R., Klinger, C., Klocke, D., Rybka, H., Schubotz, W., Windmiller, J. M., Adamidis, P. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II · doi:10.2151/jmsj.2020-021 · Cited by 228
Self-citationProjected future changes in rainfall in Southeast Asia based on CORDEX–SEA multi-model simulations
Tangang, F., Chung, J. X., Juneng, L., Supari, S., Salimun, E., Ngai, S. T., Jamaluddin, A. F., Mohd, M. S. F., Cruz, F. A. T., Narisma, G. T., et al. (2020) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-020-05322-2 · Cited by 233
Projection of climate extremes in China, an incremental exercise from CMIP5 to CMIP6
Zhu, H., Jiang, Z., & Li, L. (2021) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.07.026 · Cited by 208
Nicholls, Z., Meinshausen, M. A., Lewis, J., Gieseke, R., Dommenget, D., Dorheim, K., Fan, C.-S., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Gasser, T., Golüke, U., et al. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020 · Cited by 224
Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Physical oceanography
Rabe, B., Heuzé, C., Regnery, J., Aksenov, Y., Allerholt, J., Athanase, M., Bai, Y., Basque, C., Bauch, D., Baumann, T. M., et al. (2022) · Elementa Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00062 · Cited by 213
Stock, C. A. A., Dunne, J. P. P., Fan, S., Ginoux, P. A., John, J. G., Krasting, J. P., Laufkötter, C., Paulot, F., & Zadeh, N. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms002043 · Cited by 237
Vanos, J., Guzman-Echavarria, G., Baldwin, J. W., Bongers, C., Ebi, K. L., & Jay, O. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43121-5 · Cited by 206
Radiative–convective equilibrium model intercomparison project
Wing, A. A., Reed, K. A., Satoh, M., Stevens, B., Bony, S., & Ohno, T. (2018) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-793-2018 · Cited by 205
Self-citationA protocol for the intercomparison of marine fishery and ecosystem models: Fish-MIP v1.0
Tittensor, D. P., Eddy, T. D., Lotze, H. K., Galbraith, E. D., Cheung, W., Barangé, M., Blanchard, J. L., Bopp, L., Bryndum‐Buchholz, A., Büchner, M., et al. (2018) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-1421-2018 · Cited by 204
Reducing global air pollution: the scope for further policy interventions
Amann, M. C., Kiesewetter, G., Schöpp, W., Klimont, Z., Winiwarter, W., Cofała, J., Rafaj, P., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Gomez-Sabriana, A., Heyes, C., et al. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0331 · Cited by 210
Temperature effects on carbon storage are controlled by soil stabilisation capacities
Hartley, I. P., Hill, T., Chadburn, S., & Hugelius, G. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27101-1 · Cited by 213
Historical and Projected Changes in the Southern Hemisphere Surface Westerlies
Goyal, R., Gupta, A. S., Jucker, M., & England, M. H. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl090849 · Cited by 206
Deep learning, explained: Fundamentals, explainability, and bridgeability to process-based modelling
Razavi, S. (2021) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105159 · Cited by 221
Kosaka, Y., Kobayashi, S., Harada, Y., KOBAYASHI, C., Naoe, H., Yoshimoto, K., HARADA, M., Goto, N., Chiba, J., Miyaoka, K., et al. (2023) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II · doi:10.2151/jmsj.2024-004 · Cited by 262
Understanding human influence on climate change in China
Sun, Y., Zhang, X., Ding, Y., Chen, D., Qin, D., & Zhai, P. (2021) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwab113 · Cited by 198
Calibration‐Free Complementary Relationship Estimates Terrestrial Evapotranspiration Globally
Ma, N., Szilágyi, J., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2021wr029691 · Cited by 207
Minx, J. C., Lamb, W. F., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Crippa, M., Döbbeling-Hildebrandt, N., Forster, P. M. D. F., Guizzardi, D., Olivier, J. G. J., Peters, G. P., et al. (2021) · Earth system science data · doi:10.5194/essd-13-5213-2021 · Cited by 230
Gregory, J. M., Bouttes, N., Griffies, S. M., Helmuth Haak, G., Hurlin, W. J., Jungclaus, J. H., Kelley, M., Lee, W. G., Marshall, J. C., Romanou, A., et al. (2016) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-3993-2016 · Cited by 199
Future emergence of new ecosystems caused by glacial retreat
Bosson, J. B., Huss, M., Cauvy-Fraunié, S., Clément, J. C., Costes, G., Fischer, M., Poulenard, J., & Arthaud, F. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06302-2 · Cited by 197
Simpson, I. R., Bacmeister, J. T., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Gettelman, A., García, R. R., Lauritzen, P. H., Marsh, D. R., Mills, M. J., Medeiros, B., et al. (2020) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2020jd032835 · Cited by 209
Bellomo, K., Angeloni, M., Corti, S., & von Hardenberg, J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24015-w · Cited by 195
Chen, C., Hsu, H., & Liang, H. (2021) · Weather and Climate Extremes · doi:10.1016/j.wace.2021.100303 · Cited by 195
Vegetation-based climate mitigation in a warmer and greener World
Alkama, R., Forzieri, G., Duveiller, G., Grassi, G., Liang, S., & Cescatti, A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28305-9 · Cited by 207
On the increased climate sensitivity in the EC-Earth model from CMIP5 to CMIP6
Wyser, K., van Noije, T., Yang, S., von Hardenberg, J., O’Donnell, D., & Döscher, R. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-3465-2020 · Cited by 194
Ocean biogeochemistry in the Norwegian Earth System Model version 2 (NorESM2)
Tjiputra, J. F., Schwinger, J., Bentsen, M., Morée, A. L., Gao, S., Bethke, I., Heinze, C., Goris, N., Gupta, A. K., He, Y., et al. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-2393-2020 · Cited by 226
Bağçacı, S. Ç., Yücel, İ., Düzenli, E., & Yılmaz, M. T. (2021) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105576 · Cited by 194
Fan, X., Miao, C., Duan, Q., Shen, C., & Wu, Y. (2020) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2020jd033031 · Cited by 199
Tagliabue, A., Kwiatkowski, L., Bopp, L., Butenschön, M., Cheung, W. W. L., Lengaigne, M., & Vialard, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.738224 · Cited by 216
Eyring, V., Righi, M., Lauer, A., Evaldsson, M., Wenzel, S., Jones, C., Anav, A., Andrews, O., Cionni, I., Davin, É. L., et al. (2016) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016 · Cited by 191
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E.
- Affiliations
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
- Met Office (GB)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eyring, Veronika
- ORCID
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2016-05-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1937-1958
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W2193503481
- Cited by
- 11,981
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1479 · 2025: 2008 · 2024: 2052 · 2023: 1974 · 2022: 1839 · 2021: 1479 · 2020: 680 · 2019: 194 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 40
- FWCI
- 114.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoscientific model development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy (DEFC0297ER62402, FC02-97ER62402)
- National Center for Atmospheric Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- CMIP6, CMIP, natural climate variability, climate predictability, climate change assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
