The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Hydropower accounts for about 16% of the world's electricity supply. It has been debated whether hydroelectric generation is merely an in-stream water user or whether it also consumes water. In this paper we provide scientific support for the argument that hydroelectric generation is in most cases a significant water consumer. The study assesses the blue water footprint of hydroelectricity – the water evaporated from manmade reservoirs to produce electric energy – for 35 selected sites. The aggregated blue water footprint of the selected hydropower plants is 90 Gm3 yr−1, which is equivalent to 10% of the blue water footprint of global crop production in the year 2000. The total blue water footprint of hydroelectric generation in the world must be considerably larger if one considers the fact that this study covers only 8% of the global installed hydroelectric capacity. Hydroelectric generation is thus a significant water consumer. The average water footprint of the selected hydropower plants is 68 m3 GJ−1. Great differences in water footprint among hydropower plants exist, due to differences in climate in the places where the plants are situated, but more importantly as a result of large differences in the area flooded per unit of installed hydroelectric capacity. We recommend that water footprint assessment is added as a component in evaluations of newly proposed hydropower plants as well as in the evaluation of existing hydroelectric dams, so that the consequences of the water footprint of hydroelectric generation on downstream environmental flows and other water users can be evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Al-Shetwi, A. Q. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153645 · Cited by 703
Local flow regulation and irrigation raise global human water consumption and footprint
Jaramillo, F., & Destouni, G. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad1010 · Cited by 309
The consumptive water footprint of electricity and heat: a global assessment
Mekonnen, M. M., Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2015) · Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology · doi:10.1039/c5ew00026b · Cited by 308
Self-citationSchomberg, A. C., Bringezu, S., & Flörke, M. (2021) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-020-00080-9 · Cited by 95
Carbon and Water Footprint Analysis of a Soap Bar Produced in Brazil by Natura Cosmetics
Francke, I. C. M., & Castro, J. F. W. (2013) · Water Resources and Industry · doi:10.1016/j.wri.2013.03.003 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2012-01-20
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 179-187
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W1972241752
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-16-179-2012
- The paper
- Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2012). The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-179-2012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.