Cited by 45Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Combining Teletherapy and On-line Language Exercises in the Treatment of Chronic Aphasia: An Outcome Study

Open access
Steele, Richard D., Baird, Allison, McCall, Denise, Haynes, Lisa·2015·International Journal of Telerehabilitation

Abstract

We report a 12-week outcome study in which nine persons with long-term chronic aphasia received individual and group speech-language teletherapy services, and also used on-line language exercises to practice from home between therapy sessions. Participants were assessed at study initiation and completion using the Western Aphasia Battery, a portion of the Communicative Effectiveness Index, ASHA National Outcome Measurement System, and RIC Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia; additionally participants were polled regarding satisfaction at discharge. Pre-treatment and post-treatment means were calculated and compared, and matched t-tests were used to determine significance of improvements following treatment, with patterns of independent on-line activity analyzed. Analysis of scores shows that means improved on most measures following treatment, generally significantly: the WAB AQ improved +3.5 (p = .057); the CETI Overall (of items administered) — +17.8 (p = .01), and CCRSA Overall — + 10.4 (p = .0004). Independent work increased with time, and user satisfaction following participation was high.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5195/ijt.2014.6157

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • iPad-based aphasia rehabilitation treatments have mostly investigated impact only on language functions.

    “Additionally, iPad-based aphasia rehabilitation treatments have been investigated but, as for computer therapies, most of the findings investigated the impact only on language functions [25–28].”

    From Conversational Therapy through Semi-Immersive Virtual Reality Environments for Language Recovery and Psychological Well-Being in Post Stroke Aphasia (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Discussion describes web-based aphasia exercises accessible through an app on a portable tablet, supporting the treatment context. But the Methods (Assessment Instruments; page unavailable) says the study assessed functional communication and communicative confidence as well as language impairment. This paper therefore does not support the claim that outcomes were investigated only for language functions, or establish that most iPad-based studies did so. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most existing studies with VR-based cognitive rehabilitation focused on specific language domains such as word retrieval, sentence building, and language comprehension.

    “Most of the existing studies with VR-based cognitive rehabilitation focused on specific language domains [25–28], such as word retrieval [18, 19, 43, 44, 46–48], sentence building [20, 21], and language comprehension [22].”

    From Conversational Therapy through Semi-Immersive Virtual Reality Environments for Language Recovery and Psychological Well-Being in Post Stroke Aphasia (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Methods section (Independent On-line Therapy; page not supplied) describes TalkPath exercises in listening, speaking, reading, and writing, supporting the language-domain aspect. But the paper describes web- and iPad-based exercises combined with teletherapy, not VR-based rehabilitation, and does not establish that most existing studies focused on those domains. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Frattali CM 1998 Measuring Outcomes in SpeechLanguage Pathology New York, NY Thieme
  2. Steele RD 1995 Lingraphic methods in interface design Proceedings of the International Workshop on Human Interface Technology IWHIT’95 Aizu, Japan University of Aizu 53 58

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steele, R. D., Baird, A., McCall, D., & Haynes, L.
Venue
International Journal of Telerehabilitation
Published
2015-01-29
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
3-20
ISSN
1945-2020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1588595169
Cited by
45
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Telerehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • International Journal of Telerehabilitation (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
chronic aphasia, external beam radiotherapy, home-based therapy, speech therapy, telepractice, Western Aphasia Battery, treatment outcomes, user satisfaction, group therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review