CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Sağlık hizmetleri meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinde dürtüsellik düzeyleri ve sosyal medya bağımlılığı arasındaki ilişki

Open access
Topbaş, Zehra Su, Karakay, Arzu·2021·Journal of Dependence
DOI 10.51982/bagimli.895161
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between impulsivity levels of university students and social media addiction and the difference between impulsivity and social media addiction according to gender variable.Method: The correlation design of the quantitative research method was used. The study was conducted with 306 students studying at a health services vocational school. Sociodemographic Data Collection Forum, Short Form of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11-SF) and Social Media Addiction Scale-Adult Form were used to collect data.Results: As a result of statistical analysis, it was seen that there was a positive significant relationship between impulsivity level and social media addiction scores, and it was found that the impulsivity variable explained 18% of the total variance (R = .18, p = .00). It was observed that there was no significant difference in the impulsivity level and social media addiction of women and men.Conclusion: In this sample of Health Services Vocational School students, impulsivity predicts social media addiction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51982/bagimli.895161

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inefficient self-regulation, neglect of personal life, cognitive preoccupation, mood modifying experiences, lack of tolerance, concealment of addictive behaviors, and escapism are signs of social media addiction.

    “Inefficient self-regulation, neglect of personal life, cognitive preoccupation, mood modifying experiences, lack of tolerance, concealment of addictive behaviors, and escapism are signs of social media addiction (3, 7, 8, 19).”

    From Investigating social media addiction and impact of social media addiction, loneliness, depression, life satisfaction and problem-solving skills on academic self-efficacy and academic success among university students (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes social media addiction as excessive, increasingly frequent use that harms social, physical, and psychological functioning. It also describes difficulty controlling use and disruption to family and social life, but primarily in its discussion of internet addiction. It does not give the full claimed list of signs, including concealment, escapism, and cognitive preoccupation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Young KS. Internet addiction. Am Behav Sci 2004; 48(4): 402-441.
  2. Dalbudak E, Evren C, Aldemir S, et al. Relationship of Internet addiction severity with depression, anxiety, and alexithymia, temperament and character in university students. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013; 16(4): 272-278.
  3. İliş A, Gülbahçe A. Sosyal medya bağımlılığı ile iletişim becerileri arasındaki yordayıcı ilişkinin incelenmesi. Ekev Akademi Derg 2019; 23(78): 45-60.
  4. Kawabe K, Horiuchi F, Ochi M, et al. Internet addiction: Prevalence and relation with mental states in adolescents. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2019; 70(9): 405-412.
  5. Goel D, Subramanyam A, Kamath R. A study on the prevalence of internet addiction and its association with psychopathology in Indian adolescents. Indian J Psychiatry 2013; 55(2): 140-143.
  6. Ehrenberg A, Juckes S, White KM, Walsh SP. Personality and selfesteem as predictors of young people's technology use. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008; 11(6): 739-774.
  7. Berigel M, Kokoc M, Karal H. Exploring pre-service teachers' level of social networking sites addictive tendencies. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 2012; 12 (49A): 215-228.
  8. Yen JU, Chih-Hung K, Cheng-Fang Y, et al. Psychiatric symptoms in adolescents with internet substance use. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008; 62(1): 9-12.
  9. Carver CS. Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2005; 9(4): 312-333.
  10. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51(6): 768-774.
  11. Kuss DR, Griffiths MD. Online social networking and addiction: A review of the psychological literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011; 8(9): 3528-3552.
  12. Cao F, Su L, Liu T, Gao X. The relationship between impulsivity and internet addiction in a sample of Chinese adolescents. Eur Psychiatry 2007; 22(7): 466-471.
  13. Savcı M, Aysan F. Relationship between Impulsivity, Social media usage and loneliness. Educational Process: International Journal 2016; 5(2): 106-115.
  14. Stanford MS, Mathias CW, Dougherty DM, et al. Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness. Pers Individ Dif 2009; 47(5): 385-395.
  15. Tamam L, Güleç H, Karataş G. Barratt Dürtüsellik Ölçeği Kısa Formu (BIS-11-KF) Türkçe Uyarlama Çalışması. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi Dergisi 2013; 50: 130-134.
  16. Şahin C, Yağcı M. Sosyal Medya Bağımlılığı Ölçeği-Yetişkin Formu. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2017; 18 (1): 523-538.
  17. Feingold A. Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1994; 116(3): 429-456.
  18. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51(6): 768-774.
  19. Reynolds B, Ortengren A, Rıchards JB, De Wıt H. Dimensions of impulsive behavior: personality and behavioral measures. Pers Individ Dif 2006; 40(2): 305-315.
  20. Marazziti D, Baroni S, Masala I, et al. Impulsivity, gender, and the platelet serotonin transporter in healthy subjects. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2010; 6(1): 9-15.
  21. Stoltenberg SF, Batien BD, Birgenheir DG. Does gender moderate associations among impulsivity and health- risk behaviors?. Addict Behav 2008; 33(2): 252-265.
  22. Silverman I. Gender differences in delay of gratification: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles 2003; 49: 451-463.
  23. Dittrich M, Leipold K. Gender differences in time preferences. Econ Lett 2014; 122: 413-415.
  24. Hosseini-Kamkar N, Morton JB. Sex differences in self-regulation: An evolutionary perspective. Front Neurosci 2014; 8: 1-8.
  25. Çömlekçi MF, Başol O. Gençlerin sosyal medya kullanım amaçları ile sosyal medya bağımlılığı ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2019; 17(4): 173-188.
  26. Aktan E. Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medya bağımlılık düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 2018; 5(4): 405-421.
  27. Mazman SG, Koçak Usluel Y. Gender dıfferences ın usıng socıal networks. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 2011; 10(2): 133-139.
  28. Rousseau SJM, Puttaraju K. A study on gender differential factors in uses of social networking sites. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 2014; 3(11): 31-40.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Topbaş, Z. S., & Karakay, A.
Affiliations
  • Erciyes University (TR)
  • Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi, Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, Engelli Bakımı ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı
ORCID
Topbaş, Zehra Su
Venue
Journal of Dependence
Publisher
Academician Publishing
Published
2021-12-01
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
360-369
ISSN
3108-7973 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.51982/bagimli.895161
OpenAlex
W3183353214
Cited by
5
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
tr
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Dependence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MŞU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
impulsivity, social media addiction, gender differences, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Social Media Addiction Scale, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review