Cited by 566Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Prefrontal Control and Internet Addiction: A Theoretical Model and Review of Neuropsychological and Neuroimaging Findings

Open access
Brand, Matthias, Young, Kimberly S., Laier, Christian·2014·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Most people use the Internet as a functional tool to perform their personal goals in everyday-life such as making airline or hotel reservations. However, some individuals suffer from a loss of control over their Internet use resulting in personal distress, symptoms of psychological dependence, and diverse negative consequences. This phenomenon is often referred to as Internet addiction. Only Internet Gaming Disorder has been included in the appendix of the DSM-5, but it has already been argued that Internet addiction could also comprise problematic use of other applications with cybersex, online relations, shopping, and information search being Internet facets at risk for developing an addictive behavior. Neuropsychological investigations have pointed out that certain prefrontal functions in particular executive control functions are related to symptoms of Internet addiction, which is in line with recent theoretical models on the development and maintenance of the addictive use of the Internet. Control processes are particularly reduced when individuals with Internet addiction are confronted with Internet-related cues representing their first choice use. For example, processing Internet-related cues interferes with working memory performance and decision making. Consistent with this, results from functional neuroimaging and other neuropsychological studies demonstrate that cue-reactivity, craving, and decision making are important concepts for understanding Internet addiction. The findings on reductions in executive control are consistent with other behavioral addictions, such as pathological gambling. They also emphasize the classification of the phenomenon as an addiction, because there are also several similarities with findings in substance dependency. The neuropsychological and neuroimaging results have important clinical impact, as one therapy goal should enhance control over the Internet use by modifying specific cognitions and Internet use expectancies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00375

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional neuroimaging studies have shown that the same areas of the brain active in other substance and behavioral addictions are active in the brains of those who meet diagnostic criteria for internet addiction.

    “Second, functional neuroimaging studies have shown that the same areas of the brain that are active in other substance and behavioral addictions are active in the brains of those who meet the diagnostic criteria for internet addiction (Brand, Young, & Laier, 2014; Han, Bolo, Daniels, Arenella, Lyoo, & Renshaw, 2011; Holden, 2001; Ko et al., 2009; Ko, Liu, Yen, Yen, Chen, & Lin, 2013; Kuss & Grif”

    From Ethics of the Attention Economy: The Problem of Social Media Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Brand, Young, & Laier, 2014

    The ‘General comments on neuroimaging research’ section (page unavailable) says functional-imaging studies, mostly of Internet gamers, found brain-circuit similarities with substance addictions and pathological gambling. The ‘Functional neuroimaging’ section describes overlapping cue-related activation, but characterizes participants as excessive gamers or people with Internet addiction; it does not establish that those imaged met diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neurobiological similarities between substance addiction and compulsive social media usage are striking, particularly PFC dysfunction critical for impulse control and decision-making.

    “The neurobiological similarities between substance addiction and compulsive social media usage are striking, particularly in terms of prefrontal cortex (PFC) dysfunction, which is critical for impulse control and decision-making [32, 33].”

    From The Impact of Social Media & Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Neuroimaging Correlates section reports similarities between Internet addiction and substance addiction, including prefrontal changes; the Neuropsychological Correlates section links prefrontal regions to cognitive control and decision-making. But the review says most neural-imaging studies concerned Internet gaming, not compulsive social media use, so it does not establish the claim for that specific activity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 158 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Anderson V. Anderson P. Jacobs R. (eds) (2008). Executive Function and the Frontal Lobes: A Life Span Perspective. New York: Taylor & Francis
  2. Park H. S. Kim S. H. Bang S. A. Yoon E. J. Cho S. S. Kim S. E. (2010). Altered regional cerebral glucose metabolism in Internet game overusers: a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography study. CNS Spectr. 15, 159– 166 20414165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brand, M., Young, K. S., & Laier, C.
Affiliations
  • Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DE)
  • St. Bonaventure University (US)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Corresponding author
Brand, Matthias
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
8
Pages
375-375
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111982163
Cited by
565
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
14.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet addiction, prefrontal control, executive function, cue reactivity, craving, decision-making, working memory, behavioral addiction, gambling addiction, internet gaming disorder, DSM-5, online shopping addiction, cybersex addiction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review