Cited by 52Educational Outcomes and InfluencesPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Spanish version of the time management behavior questionnaire for university students

García-Ros, Rafael, Pérez-González, Francisco·2012·The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The main objective of the study is to analyze the psychometric properties and predictive capacity on academic performance in university contexts of a Spanish adaptation of the Time Management Behavior Questionnaire. The scale was applied to 462 students newly admitted at the Universitat de València in the 2006-2007 school year. The analyses performed made it possible to reproduce the factorial structure of the original version of the questionnaire with slight modifications in the ascription of various items. The underlying factorial structure includes four interrelated dimensions (Establishing objectives and priorities, Time management tools, Perception of time control and Preference for disorganization), which present satisfactory levels of reliability and an adequate convergent validity with the Time management subscale of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. The scores on the dimensions of time management show significant levels of association with academic performance in the first year of university studies, especially highlighting the predictive capacity of the subscale dealing with the Establishment of objectives and priorities. These results show the reliability and validity of this adaptation of the scale for evaluating how the students manage their academic time, and predicting their performance in the year they initiate the degree program, thus aiding in the development of intervention proposals directed towards improving these skills.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n3.39432

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García-Ros, R., & Pérez-González, F.
Affiliations
Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
García-Ros, Rafael
Venue
The Spanish Journal of Psychology
Published
2012-11
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
1485-1494
ISSN
  • 1138-7416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1988-2904
OpenAlex
W2105259768
Cited by
52
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Spanish Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
time management, university students, academic performance, Spanish adaptation, psychometric properties, factor structure, convergent validity, time management tools, time perception, Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, student performance prediction
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spain, Students, Time Factors, Universities, Reproducibility of Results, Time Management, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review