Cited by 288Open Source Software InnovationsSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesTeam Dynamics and Performance

Essence of distributed work: the case of the Linux kernel

Open access
Moon, Jae Yun, Sproull, Lee·2000·First Monday

Abstract

This paper provides a historical account of how the Linux operating system kernel was developed from three different perspectives. Each focuses on different critical factors in its success at the individual, group, and community levels. The technical and management decisions of Linus Torvalds the individual were critical in laying the groundwork for a collaborative software development project that has lasted almost a decade. The contributions of volunteer programmers distributed worldwide enabled the development of an operating system on the par with proprietary operating systems. The Linux electronic community was the organizing structure that coordinated the efforts of the individual programmers. The paper concludes by summarizing the factors important in the successful distributed development of the Linux kernel, and the implications for organizationally managed distributed work arrangements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5210/fm.v5i11.801

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Debian, as well as other OSS communities like Apache or Linux, came up with new ways of organizing distributed work that differed from traditional work practices in professional organizations.

    “As a respond to mounting organizational challenges Debian as well as other OSS communities like Apache or Linux, came up with new ways of organizing distributed work that differed from traditional work practices as experienced in professional organizations (Franke and von Hippel, 2003, Lee and Cole, 2003, Moon and Sproull, 2000).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moon, J. Y., & Sproull, L.
Venue
First Monday
Published
2000-11-05
Volume
5
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
  • 1396-0466
OpenAlex
W2132453971
Cited by
288
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
47.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
First Monday (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
Linux kernel, distributed work, open source software development, Linus Torvalds, developer communities, collaborative software development, open source communities, operating system development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review