Cited by 18Probabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignGaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification Through Loss Minimisation

Bengs, Viktor, Hüllermeier, Eyke, Waegeman, Willem·2022·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/068431-2118

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Second-order uncertainty prediction, a distribution of distributions, has recently been treated using inference based on Bayesian methods and credal sets.

    “This type of prediction, a distribution of distributions, also called second-order uncertainty (Hüllermeier et al., 2022;Bengs et al., 2022), has been recently treated using inference based on Bayesian methods and credal sets, which are convex sets of probability distributions (Shaker & Hüllermeier, 2021).”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bengs, V., Hüllermeier, E., & Waegeman, W.
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35
Published
2022
Pages
29205-29216
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133199676
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
epistemic uncertainty quantification, loss reduction, Bayesian inference, model misspecification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review