Cited by 2Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

FlexCap: Describe Anything in Images in Controllable Detail

Open access
Dwibedi, Debidatta, Jain, Vidhi, Tompson, Jonathan, Zisserman, Andrew, Aytar, Yusuf·2024·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37

Abstract

We introduce FlexCap, a vision-language model that generates region-specific descriptions of varying lengths. FlexCap is trained to produce length-conditioned captions for input boxes, enabling control over information density, with descriptions ranging from concise object labels to detailed captions. To achieve this, we create large-scale training datasets of image region descriptions with varying lengths from captioned web images. We demonstrate FlexCap's effectiveness in several applications: first, it achieves strong performance in dense captioning tasks on the Visual Genome dataset. Second, we show how FlexCap's localized descriptions can serve as input to a large language model to create a visual question answering (VQA) system, achieving state-of-the-art zero-shot performance on multiple VQA benchmarks. Our experiments illustrate FlexCap's utility for tasks including image labeling, object attribute recognition, and visual dialog. Project webpage: https://flex-cap.github.io .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/079017-3530

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synthetic captions were generated using Gemini and FlexCap models.

    “Synthetic captions were generated using Gemini and FlexCap (Dwibedi et al., 2024) models and allow the model to learn details about the image.”

    From Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World (2025) · cites this paper as Dwibedi et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. I. Alabdulmohsin, X. Zhai, A. Kolesnikov, and L. Beyer. Getting vit in shape: Scaling laws for compute- optimal model design. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  2. J.-B. Alayrac, J. Donahue, P. Luc, A. Miech, I. Barr, Y. Hasson, K. Lenc, A. Mensch, K. Millican, M. Reynolds, R. Ring, E. Rutherford, S. Cabi, T. Han, Z. Gong, S. Samangooei, M. Monteiro, J. Menick, S. Borgeaud, A. Brock, A. Nematzadeh, S. Sharifzadeh, M. Binkowski, R. Barreira, O. Vinyals, A. Zisser- man, and K. Simonyan. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. ArXiv, abs/2204.14198, 2022. · arXiv
  3. J.-B. Alayrac, J. Donahue, P. Luc, A. Miech, I. Barr, Y. Hasson, K. Lenc, A. Mensch, K. Millican, M. Reynolds, R. Ring, E. Rutherford, S. Cabi, T. Han, Z. Gong, S. Samangooei, M. Monteiro, J. Menick, S. Borgeaud, A. Brock, A. Nematzadeh, S. Sharifzadeh, M. Binkowski, R. Barreira, O. Vinyals, A. Zisser- man, and K. Simonyan. Flamingo: a visual language model for Few-Shot learning. ArXiv, abs/2204.14198, 2022. · arXiv
  4. R. Anil, A. M. Dai, O. Firat, M. Johnson, D. Lepikhin, A. Passos, S. Shakeri, E. Taropa, P. Bailey, Z. Chen, et al. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv-2305, 2023.
  5. S. Antol, A. Agrawal, J. Lu, M. Mitchell, D. Batra, C. L. Zitnick, and D. Parikh. Vqa: Visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2425-2433, 2015.
  6. H. Bao, W. Wang, L. Dong, Q. Liu, O. K. Mohammed, K. Aggarwal, S. Som, S. Piao, and F. Wei. Vlmo: Unified vision-language pre-training with mixture-of-modality-experts. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:32897-32912, 2022.
  7. T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901, 2020.
  8. X. Chen, X. Wang, S. Changpinyo, A. Piergiovanni, P. Padlewski, D. Salz, S. Goodman, A. Grycner, B. Mustafa, L. Beyer, et al. Pali: A jointly-scaled multilingual language-image model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06794, 2022. · arXiv
  9. X. Chen, X. Wang, S. Changpinyo, A. Piergiovanni, P. Padlewski, D. Salz, S. Goodman, A. Grycner, B. Mustafa, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, J. Puigcerver, N. Ding, K. Rong, H. Akbari, G. Mishra, L. Xue, A. V. Thapliyal, J. Bradbury, W. Kuo, M. Seyedhosseini, C. Jia, B. K. Ayan, C. R. Ruiz, A. P. Steiner, A. Angelova, X. Zhai, N. Houlsby, and R. Soricut. PaLI: A jointly-scaled multilingual language-image model. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  10. W. Dai, J. Li, D. Li, A. M. H. Tiong, J. Zhao, W. Wang, B. Li, P. Fung, and S. Hoi. Instructblip: towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS '23, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2024.
  11. A. Das, S. Kottur, K. Gupta, A. Singh, D. Yadav, J. M. Moura, D. Parikh, and D. Batra. Visual dialog. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 326-335, 2017.
  12. C. Deng, N. Ding, M. Tan, and Q. Wu. Length-controllable image captioning. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIII 16, pages 712-729. Springer, 2020.
  13. D. Driess, F. Xia, M. S. Sajjadi, C. Lynch, A. Chowdhery, B. Ichter, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, Q. Vuong, T. Yu, et al. Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03378, 2023. · arXiv
  14. Y. Goyal, T. Khot, D. Summers-Stay, D. Batra, and D. Parikh. Making the v in vqa matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answering. International Journal of Computer Vision, 127:398 -414, 2016.
  15. X. Gu, T.-Y. Lin, W. Kuo, and Y. Cui. Open-vocabulary object detection via vision and language knowledge distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13921, 2021. · arXiv
  16. D. Gurari, Q. Li, A. Stangl, A. Guo, C. Lin, K. Grauman, J. Luo, and J. P. Bigham. Vizwiz grand challenge: Answering visual questions from blind people. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3608-3617, 2018.
  17. A. Holtzman, J. Buys, L. Du, M. Forbes, and Y. Choi. The curious case of neural text degeneration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09751, 2019. · arXiv
  18. R. Hu, A. Rohrbach, T. Darrell, and K. Saenko. Language-conditioned graph networks for relational reasoning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10294- 10303, 2019.
  19. Y. Hu, H. Hua, Z. Yang, W. Shi, N. A. Smith, and J. Luo. Promptcap: Prompt-guided image captioning for vqa with gpt-3. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2963-2975, 2023.
  20. D. Hudson and C. D. Manning. Learning by abstraction: The neural state machine. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  21. D. A. Hudson and C. D. Manning. Gqa: a new dataset for compositional question answering over real-world images. ArXiv, abs/1902.09506, 2019. · arXiv
  22. C. Jia, Y. Yang, Y. Xia, Y.-T. Chen, Z. Parekh, H. Pham, Q. Le, Y.-H. Sung, Z. Li, and T. Duerig. Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4904-4916. PMLR, 2021.
  23. W. Jin, Y. Cheng, Y. Shen, W. Chen, and X. Ren. A good prompt is worth millions of parameters: Low-resource prompt-based learning for vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08484, 2021. · arXiv
  24. J. Johnson, A. Karpathy, and L. Fei-Fei. Densecap: Fully convolutional localization networks for dense captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4565-4574, 2016.
  25. D.-J. Kim, J. Choi, T.-H. Oh, and I. S. Kweon. Dense relational captioning: Triple-stream networks for relationship-based captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6271-6280, 2019.
  26. R. Krishna, Y. Zhu, O. Groth, J. Johnson, K. Hata, J. Kravitz, S. Chen, Y. Kalantidis, L.-J. Li, D. A. Shamma, et al. Visual genome: Connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. International journal of computer vision, 123:32-73, 2017.
  27. J. Li, D. Li, C. Xiong, and S. Hoi. Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision- language understanding and generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 12888- 12900. PMLR, 2022.
  28. X. Li, S. Jiang, and J. Han. Learning object context for dense captioning. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 33, pages 8650-8657, 2019.
  29. T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740-755. Springer, 2014.
  30. H. Liu, C. Li, Q. Wu, and Y. J. Lee. Visual instruction tuning. In NeurIPS, 2023.
  31. K. Marino, M. Rastegari, A. Farhadi, and R. Mottaghi. Ok-vqa: A visual question answering benchmark requiring external knowledge. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 3190-3199, 2019.
  32. M. Minderer, A. Gritsenko, and N. Houlsby. Scaling open-vocabulary object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09683, 2023. · arXiv
  33. M. Minderer, A. Gritsenko, A. Stone, M. Neumann, D. Weissenborn, A. Dosovitskiy, A. Mahendran, A. Arnab, M. Dehghani, Z. Shen, X. Wang, X. Zhai, T. Kipf, and N. Houlsby. Simple open-vocabulary object detection. In Computer Vision -ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23-27, 2022, Proceedings, Part X, page 728-755, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2022. Springer-Verlag.
  34. B. X. Nguyen, T. Do, H. Tran, E. Tjiputra, Q. D. Tran, and A. Nguyen. Coarse-to-fine reasoning for visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4558-4566, 2022.
  35. Z. Peng, W. Wang, L. Dong, Y. Hao, S. Huang, S. Ma, Q. Ye, and F. Wei. Grounding multimodal large language models to the world. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  36. A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748-8763. PMLR, 2021.
  37. C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, K. Lee, S. Narang, M. Matena, Y. Zhou, W. Li, and P. J. Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):5485-5551, 2020.
  38. Z. Shao, J. Han, D. Marnerides, and K. Debattista. Region-object relation-aware dense captioning via transformer. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022.
  39. Z. Shao, Z. Yu, M. Wang, and J. Yu. Prompting large language models with answer heuristics for knowledge-based visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14974-14983, 2023.
  40. Q. Sun, Q. Yu, Y. Cui, F. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Gao, J. Liu, T. Huang, and X. Wang. Emu: Gener- ative pretraining in multimodality. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  41. D. Sur'is, S. Menon, and C. Vondrick. ViperGPT: Visual inference via python execution for reasoning. ArXiv, abs/2303.08128, 2023. · arXiv
  42. H. Tan and M. Bansal. Lxmert: Learning cross-modality encoder representations from transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07490, 2019. · arXiv
  43. Y. Tewel, Y. Shalev, I. Schwartz, and L. Wolf. Zerocap: Zero-shot image-to-text generation for visual- semantic arithmetic. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17918-17928, 2022.
  44. B. Thomee, D. A. Shamma, G. Friedland, B. Elizalde, K. Ni, D. Poland, D. Borth, and L.-J. Li. Yfcc100m: the new data in multimedia research. Commun. ACM, 59(2):64-73, jan 2016.
  45. T. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Fei, Y. Ge, H. Zheng, Y. Tang, Z. Li, M. Gao, S. Zhao, Y. Shan, et al. Caption anything: Interactive image description with diverse multimodal controls. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02677, 2023. · arXiv
  46. W. Wang, H. Bao, L. Dong, J. Bjorck, Z. Peng, Q. Liu, K. Aggarwal, O. K. Mohammed, S. Singhal, S. Som, et al. Image as a foreign language: Beit pretraining for all vision and vision-language tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.10442, 2022. · arXiv
  47. W. Wang, M. Shi, Q. Li, W. Wang, Z. Huang, L. Xing, Z. Chen, H. Li, X. Zhu, Z. Cao, et al. The all-seeing project: Towards panoptic visual recognition and understanding of the open world. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01907, 2023. · arXiv
  48. Z. Wang, J. Yu, A. W. Yu, Z. Dai, Y. Tsvetkov, and Y. Cao. Simvlm: Simple visual language model pretraining with weak supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10904, 2021. · arXiv
  49. J. Wu, J. Wang, Z. Yang, Z. Gan, Z. Liu, J. Yuan, and L. Wang. Grit: A generative region-to-text transformer for object understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.00280, 2022. · arXiv
  50. S. Wu, W. Zhang, L. Xu, S. Jin, W. Liu, and C. C. Loy. Clim: Contrastive language-image mosaic for region representation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 6117-6125, 2024.
  51. D. Xu, Z. Zhao, J. Xiao, F. Wu, H. Zhang, X. He, and Y. Zhuang. Video question answering via gradually refined attention over appearance and motion. In ACM Multimedia, 2017.
  52. J. Xu, T. Mei, T. Yao, and Y. Rui. Msr-vtt: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5288-5296, 2016.
  53. L. Yang, K. Tang, J. Yang, and L.-J. Li. Dense captioning with joint inference and visual context. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2193-2202, 2017.
  54. Z. Yang, Z. Gan, J. Wang, X. Hu, Y. Lu, Z. Liu, and L. Wang. An empirical study of gpt-3 for few-shot knowledge-based vqa. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 3081-3089, 2022.
  55. G. Yin, L. Sheng, B. Liu, N. Yu, X. Wang, and J. Shao. Context and attribute grounded dense captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6241-6250, 2019.
  56. H. You, H. Zhang, Z. Gan, X. Du, B. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. Cao, S.-F. Chang, and Y. Yang. Ferret: Refer and ground anything anywhere at any granularity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07704, 2023. · arXiv
  57. X. Zhai, B. Mustafa, A. Kolesnikov, and L. Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15343, 2023. · arXiv
  58. Y. Zhong, J. Yang, P. Zhang, C. Li, N. Codella, L. H. Li, L. Zhou, X. Dai, L. Yuan, Y. Li, et al. Regionclip: Region-based language-image pretraining. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16793-16803, 2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dwibedi, D., Jain, V., Tompson, J., Zisserman, A., & Aytar, Y.
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37
Published
2024
Pages
111172-111198
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415795643
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
image captioning, image description generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review