PreprintCited by 454Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRobot Manipulation and Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 61 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities

Open access
Chen, Boyuan, Xu, Zhuo, Kirmani, Sean, Ichter, Brian, Driess, Danny, Florence, Pete, Sadigh, Dorsa, Guibas, Leonidas, Xia, Fei·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Understanding and reasoning about spatial relationships is a fundamental capability for Visual Question Answering (VQA) and robotics. While Vision Language Models (VLM) have demonstrated remarkable performance in certain VQA benchmarks, they still lack capabilities in 3D spatial reasoning, such as recognizing quantitative relationships of physical objects like distances or size differences. We hypothesize that VLMs' limited spatial reasoning capability is due to the lack of 3D spatial knowledge in training data and aim to solve this problem by training VLMs with Internet-scale spatial reasoning data. To this end, we present a system to facilitate this approach. We first develop an automatic 3D spatial VQA data generation framework that scales up to 2 billion VQA examples on 10 million real-world images. We then investigate various factors in the training recipe, including data quality, training pipeline, and VLM architecture. Our work features the first internet-scale 3D spatial reasoning dataset in metric space. By training a VLM on such data, we significantly enhance its ability on both qualitative and quantitative spatial VQA. Finally, we demonstrate that this VLM unlocks novel downstream applications in chain-of-thought spatial reasoning and robotics due to its quantitative estimation capability. Project website: https://spatial-vlm.github.io/

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2401.12168

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The instruction-tuned model achieves much higher precision than baselines using in-context learning.

    “Our results (Table 2, Fig. 5) show that our instruction-tuned model achieves much higher precision than baselines using in-context learning [17, 22].”

    From RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    Section 4.1 (Spatial VQA performance; page unavailable) reports that SpatialVLM outperformed baseline models by large margins on quantitative spatial questions, supporting the general comparison. It measures accuracy of distance estimates, however, and does not identify those baselines as using in-context learning or report a precision comparison. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ROBOPOINT achieves better performance on real-world spatial reasoning tasks than SpatialVLM by locating affordances as points.

    “SpatialVLM [22] took a step forward to predict spatial relations in metric space, but we show that ROBOPOINT can achieve better performance on real-world spatial reasoning tasks by locating affordances as points.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Rohan Anil, Andrew M Dai, Orhan Firat, Melvin Johnson, Dmitry Lepikhin, Alexandre Passos, Siamak Shakeri, Emanuel Taropa, Paige Bailey, Zhifeng Chen, et al. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023. · arXiv
  2. Anonymous. Flexcap: Generating rich, localized, and flexible captions in images. In Submitted to The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=7Phicg0WAg. under review.
  3. Liangyu Chen, Bo Li, Sheng Shen, Jingkang Yang, Chunyuan Li, Kurt Keutzer, Trevor Darrell, and Ziwei Liu. Language models are visual reasoning coordinators. In ICLR 2023 Workshop on Mathematical and Empirical Understanding of Foundation Models, 2023.
  4. Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jörg Sander, Xiaowei Xu, et al. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In kdd, volume 96, pages 226-231, 1996.
  5. Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2961-2969, 2017.
  6. Parsa Mahmoudieh, Deepak Pathak, and Trevor Darrell. Zero-shot reward specification via grounded natural language. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 14743-14752. PMLR, 2022.
  7. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748-8763. PMLR, 2021.
  8. Jesse Thomason, Mohit Shridhar, Yonatan Bisk, Chris Paxton, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Language grounding with 3d objects. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 1691-1701. PMLR, 2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, B., Xu, Z., Kirmani, S., Ichter, B., Driess, D., Florence, P., Sadigh, D., Guibas, L., & Xia, F.
Affiliations
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
14455-14465
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402716288
Cited by
269
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 20
FWCI
55.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
vision-language models, spatial reasoning, 3D spatial reasoning, visual question answering, qualitative spatial reasoning, automatic data generation, metric spaces, chain-of-thought reasoning, robotics, distance estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review