The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RECENT RELATED RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Open accessAbstract
Technology Acceptance Model is widely applied to access users’ usage in various information system/information technology areas. Learning the critical role of Technology Acceptance Model can guide researchers to design different users’ interface for different online customers, and consequently achieve high user usage in different application areas. This study reviewed 24 studies to understand the past, now and future of Technology Acceptance Model. We discussed the related studies to clarify the extension of Technology Acceptance Model. Besides, the application areas are elaborated including electronic service, mobile data service, self-service technology, electronic learning and so on. Finally, the article concluded the conclusions and future research direction.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context
Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00061-6 · Cited by 3,802
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204 · Cited by 3,575
Kaplan, B., DeGross, J. I., Wood-Harper, A. T., Wastell, D. G., & Truex, D. P., III (2004) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/b115738 · Cited by 3,139
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hansen, J. M., Saridakis, G., & Benson, V. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.010 · Cited by 629
Digital payment and banking adoption research in Gulf countries: A systematic literature review
Alkhowaiter, W. A. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102102 · Cited by 449
Al-Adwan, A., Al‐Adwan, A. S., & Smedley, J. (2013) · The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (The University of the West Indies) · Cited by 269
Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea
Baber, H. (2021) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503 · Cited by 292
Examining intention to adopt to internet of things in healthcare technology products
Adem Karahoca, A., Karahoca, D., & Aksöz, M. (2017) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-02-2017-0045 · Cited by 219
Pietro, L. D., Mugion, R. G., Mattia, G., Renzi, M. F., & Toni, M. (2015) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2015.05.001 · Cited by 181
Enterprise resource planning adoption and satisfaction determinants
Costa, C. J., Ferreira, E., Bento, F., & Aparicio, M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.090 · Cited by 161
Investigating the drivers and barriers to MOOCs adoption: The perspective of TAM
Al‐Adwan, A. S. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10250-z · Cited by 156
Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020) · IAFOR Journal of Education · doi:10.22492/ije.8.2.05 · Cited by 182
Mugo, D. M., Njagi, K., Chemwei, B., & Motanya, J. (2017) · British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science · doi:10.9734/bjmcs/2017/29015 · Cited by 141
The effects of subjective norm and knowledge about riba on intention to use e-money in Indonesia
Aji, H. M., Berakon, I., & Riza, A. F. (2020) · Journal of Islamic marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-10-2019-0203 · Cited by 152
Mobile Learning Adoption: A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model from 2017 to 2020
Alsharida, R. A. F., Hammood, M. M., & Al‐Emran, M. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v16i05.18093 · Cited by 101
Chaveesuk, S., Khalid, B., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2021) · Innovative Marketing · doi:10.21511/im.17(3).2021.09 · Cited by 91
Modeling crowdfunders’ behavioral intention to adopt the crowdfunding-waqf model (CWM) in Malaysia
Thaker, M. A. M. T., Thaker, H. M. T., & Pitchay, A. A. (2018) · International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management · doi:10.1108/imefm-06-2017-0157 · Cited by 101
Bhat, M. A., Tiwari, C. K., Bhaskar, P., & Khan, S. T. (2024) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-03-2024-0033 · Cited by 97
Nja, C., Idiege, K. J., Uwe, U. E., Meremikwu, A. N., Ekon, E. E., Erim, C. M., Ukah, J. U., Eyo, E. O., Anari, M. I., & Cornelius-Ukpepi, B. U. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00261-x · Cited by 130
Cimbaljević, M., Bajrami, D. D., Kovačić, S., Pavluković, V., Stankov, U., & Vujičić, M. D. (2023) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-09-2022-0516 · Cited by 78
Sundram, V. P. K., Chhetri, P., & Bahrin, A. S. (2020) · Journal of International Logistics and Trade · doi:10.24006/jilt.2020.18.1.015 · Cited by 86
Establishing confidence in food safety: is traceability a solution in consumers’ eyes?
Zhang, A., Mankad, A., & Ariyawardana, A. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety · doi:10.1007/s00003-020-01277-y · Cited by 73
Factors influencing the adoption of the crowdfunding-waqf model (CWM) in the waqf land development
Thaker, M. A. M. T. (2018) · Journal of Islamic marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-05-2016-0043 · Cited by 83
The Impact of Management Information Systems Adoption in Managerial Decision Making: A Review
Al‐Mamary, Y. H., Shamsuddin, A., & Hamid, N. A. A. (2018) · JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE · Cited by 61
Opoku, M. O., & Enu-kwesi, F. (2020) · Pressacademia · doi:10.17261/pressacademia.2020.1186 · Cited by 67
Taylor, P. B. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 55
Mosweu, O., Bwalya, K. J., & Mutshewa, A. (2016) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666916640593 · Cited by 54
How is technology accepted by users? A review of technology acceptance models and theories
Alomary, A., & Woollard, J. (2015) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 54
Li, F. S., Zhu, D., Lin, M.-T., & Kim, P. B. (2024) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/19389655241226558 · Cited by 48
Chen, Y. (2014) · Journal of Computers · doi:10.4304/jcp.9.1.34-43 · Cited by 48
Ahlan, A. R., & Ahmad, B. I. (2022) · International journal of information systems and project management · doi:10.12821/ijispm030102 · Cited by 51
Exploring students’ intention to use LINE for academic purposes based on technology acceptance model
Bogart, W. G. V. D., & Wichadee, S. (2015) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.1894 · Cited by 53
Hospitality employees’ technology adoption at the workplace: evidence from a meta-analysis
Guo, Q., Zhu, D., Lin, M.-T., Li, F. S., Kim, P. B., De, D., & Shu, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-06-2022-0701 · Cited by 52
Idoga, P. E., Toycan, M., Nadi̇ri̇, H., & Çelebi, E. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0751-x · Cited by 43
Understanding the Drivers of Ghanaian Citizens' Adoption Intentions of Mobile Health Services
Mensah, I. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.906106 · Cited by 47
Toycan, M., & Abdullah, M. S. (2017) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/ejmste/81554 · Cited by 42
Employee Perception and Behavioral Intention to Adopt BYOD in the Organizations
Gupta, R., Bhardwaj, G., & Singh, G. (2019) · International Conference on Automation, Computational and Technology Management (ICACTM) · doi:10.1109/icactm.2019.8776815 · Cited by 39
Shava, H., Chinyamurindi, W., & Somdyala, A. (2016) · South African journal of information management · doi:10.4102/sajim.v18i1.716 · Cited by 41
Consumers’ Attitude towards Renewable Energy in the Context of the Energy Crisis
Gârdan, I. P., Micu, A., Paștiu, C., Micu, A.-E., & Gârdan, D. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16020676 · Cited by 40
Healthcare digital transformation through the adoption of artificial intelligence
Wong, B. K. M., Vengusamy, S., & Bastrygina, T. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21598-8.00014-2 · Cited by 38
Analyzing the Behavioral Intention Factors in Using Zakat-Based Crowdfunding Platform in Indonesia
Sulaeman, S., & Ninglasari, S. Y. (2020) · International Journal of Zakat · doi:10.37706/ijaz.v5i3.267 · Cited by 37
Ibrahim, A., & Shiring, E. J. (2022) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.285 · Cited by 36
Intention to Use e-Learning: Aplikasi Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Rahmawati, R. N., & Narsa, I. M. (2019) · Owner · doi:10.33395/owner.v3i2.151 · Cited by 53
Factors Influencing Live Customer Support Chat Services: An Empirical Investigation in Kuwait
Elmorshidy, A., Mostafa, M. M., Moghrabi, I. A. R., & Al-Mezen, H. (2014) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.4067/s0718-18762015000300006 · Cited by 35
Joo, K., Kim, J. S., & Hwang, J. (2024) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2024.2318429 · Cited by 37
Millennials’ Intention to Invest through Securities Crowdfunding Platform
Febrianti, N. M. N., & Darma, G. S. (2023) · Aptisi Transactions On Technopreneurship (ATT) · doi:10.34306/att.v5i1.280 · Cited by 31
University of South Alabama, Howard, M. C., Hair, J. F., & University of South Alabama (2023) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00084 · Cited by 27
AJIBADE, O. E., Ibietan, J., & Ayelabola, O. (2017) · Journal of Public Administration and Governance · doi:10.5296/jpag.v7i4.11475 · Cited by 27
AL-Sayid, F., & Kirkil, G. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2087013 · Cited by 27
Empirical Investigation of Internet Banking Usage: The Case of Turkey
Çakmakçı, S. D., & Özkan, S. (2014) · Procedia Technology · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.098 · Cited by 27
A modified TAM for predicting acceptance of digital educational games by teachers
Dele-Ajayi, O., Strachan, R., Sanderson, J., & Pickard, A. J. (2017) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon.2017.7942965 · Cited by 28
Lopez, K. D., Chae, S., Michele, G., Fraczkowski, D., Habibi, P., Chattopadhyay, D., & Donevant, S. B. (2020) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.22078 · Cited by 26
The impact of customised mobile marketing on passenger shopping behaviour in the airport terminal
Wu, C., & Ma, N. K. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102941 · Cited by 24
Testing of the Technology Acceptance Model in Context of Yemen
Al‐Mamary, Y. H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2015) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p268 · Cited by 24
E-Retail Adoption in Emerging Markets
Kumar, A., Sikdar, P., & Alam, M. M. (2016) · International Journal of E-Business Research · doi:10.4018/ijebr.2016070104 · Cited by 27
Development and determinants of end-user intention: usage of expert systems
Alshare, K. A., Alomari, M. K., Lane, P. L., & Freeze, R. D. (2019) · Journal of Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1108/jsit-08-2018-0108 · Cited by 23
Kim, H. M., Kim, J. S., Joo, K., & Hwang, J. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-01-2024-0123 · Cited by 22
Sulaeman, S., & Ninglasari, S. Y. (2020) · International Conference of Zakat · doi:10.37706/iconz.2020.218 · Cited by 21
Ltifi, M., & Mesfar, S. (2022) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102256 · Cited by 21
Mobile claim management adoption in emerging insurance markets
Gowanit, C., Thawesaengskulthai, N., Sophatsathit, P., & Chaiyawat, T. (2016) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-04-2015-0063 · Cited by 20
The adoption of e-learning beyond MOOCs for higher education
Liu, C. (2020) · International Journal of Accounting and Information Management · doi:10.1108/ijaim-08-2020-0129 · Cited by 21
Tahat, D. N., Habes, M., Tahat, K. M., Pasha, S. A., Attar, R. W., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alblehai, F. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152115280 · Cited by 19
Sakarji, S. R., Nor, K. M., Razali, M. M., Talib, N., Ahmad, N., & Saferdin, W. A. A. W. M. (2019) · Journal of Information System and Technology Management · doi:10.35631/jistm.413002 · Cited by 19
Millennials Acceptance of Insurance Telematics: An Integrative Empirical Study
Tian, X., Prybutok, V. R., Mirzaei, F. H., & Dinulescu, C. C. (2020) · American Business Review · doi:10.37625/abr.23.1.156-181 · Cited by 19
Bîlbîie, A., Puiu, A.-I., Mihăilă, V., & Burcea, M. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12151531 · Cited by 22
Al-Sayyed, F., & Abdalhaq, B. K. (2016) · Cited by 18
AL-Sayid, F., & Kirkil, G. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11635-6 · Cited by 17
Sestino, A., Leoni, E., & Gastaldi, L. (2024) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-09-2023-0794 · Cited by 22
Al‐Mamary, Y. H., Shamsuddin, A., Hamid, N. A. A., & Al-Maamari, M. H. (2015) · Cited by 17
Boosting Students’ Motivation in Learning Descriptive Writing through Instagram
Min, T. S., & Hashim, H. B. (2022) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2022.133060 · Cited by 16
Georgiou, D., Trikoili, A., & Kester, L. (2023) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100145 · Cited by 27
AL-Sayid, F., & Kirkil, G. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3534740 · Cited by 21
Increasing e-government adoption in Malaysia: MyEG case study
Husin, M. H., Loghmani, N., & Abidin, S. S. Z. (2017) · Journal of Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1108/jsit-01-2017-0007 · Cited by 16
Frans, C., & Pather, S. (2021) · African Journal of Science Technology Innovation and Development · doi:10.1080/20421338.2021.1975354 · Cited by 15
The Moderating Role of Knowledge about Riba on Intention to Use E-Money: Findings from Indonesia
Aji, H. M., Berakon, I., Muafi, M., & Kholid, M. N. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) · doi:10.1109/iea.2019.8714982 · Cited by 14
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON ACADEMIC SUSTAINABILITY OF MOBILE LEARNING AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL
Afzal, J. (2023) · Pakistan Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.52337/pjer.v6i2.788 · Cited by 15
Online Shoppers Acceptance An Exploratory StudyPreprint
Siahaan, A. P. U., & Nasution, M. D. T. P. (2018) · doi:10.31227/osf.io/4hs6x · Cited by 14
EVALUASI FAKTOR KEGAGALAN SISTEM INFORMASI PADA KESIAPAN PENERAPAN E-GOVERNMENT: STUDI LITERATUR
Mada, U. G., Pamungkas, A. R., Nugroho, L. E., & Sulistyo, S. (2020) · JIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer) · doi:10.33387/jiko.v3i3.2176 · Cited by 13
Andarwati, M., Assih, P., Amrullah, F., Putri, D. M., & Thamrin, E. (2020) · doi:10.1109/icet51153.2020.9276594 · Cited by 13
Ofori, D. F., Light, O., & Ankomah, J. (2023) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-09-2022-0045 · Cited by 11
AI anxiety and awareness of German teacher candidates
DARANCIK, Y., Kaçar, E., & Sezik, A. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13573-x · Cited by 14
Ikbal, M., & Hamid, R. S. (2016) · Information Management and Business Review · doi:10.22610/imbr.v8i1.1196 · Cited by 11
An Investigation of the Variables That Predict Teacher E-Learning Acceptance
Attis, J. (2014) · Digital Commons (Liberty University) · Cited by 11
The Moderating Role of Perceived Self-efficacy in the Context of Online Buying Adoption
Iconaru, C. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 11
A Review of Empirical Studies on User Acceptance of Driver Assistance Systems
Isa, M. H. M., Deros, B. M., & Kassim, K. A. A. (2015) · GATR Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review · doi:10.35609/gjbssr.2015.3.3(5 · Cited by 11
Technology and Innovation for Creating Social Change: Concepts and Theories
Singh, A., & Majumdar, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2071-8_7 · Cited by 11
Consumer-centric factors for the implementation of smart meters in South Africa
Muchenje, T., & Botha, R. A. (2021) · South African Computer Journal · doi:10.18489/sacj.v33i2.909 · Cited by 9
Factors Influencing E-learning Technology Among Youth in India: An Extended TAM Model
Sharma, B. K., Kumar, V. V. R., & Bhatt, V. (2023) · Management and Labour Studies · doi:10.1177/0258042x231208588 · Cited by 12
Al‐Mamary, Y. H., Shamsuddin, A., & Aziati, N. (2014) · Journal of Management and Science · doi:10.26524/jms.2014.16 · Cited by 10
Mogendi, J. B., Steur, H. D., Gellynck, X., & Makokha, A. O. (2016) · Ecology of Food and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/03670244.2015.1112283 · Cited by 11
Kucirkova, N. I., & Hiniker, A. (2023) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2023.2166529 · Cited by 9
Kalumendo, R. (2022) · Texila international journal of academic research · doi:10.21522/tijar.2014.09.04.art003 · Cited by 10
Raymundo, T. M., & Santana, C. D. S. (2014) · IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mce.2014.2340071 · Cited by 9
Rogers, A. D. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 9
Kim, H. W., & Chang, H. (2022) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2022.28.1.68 · Cited by 8
Opoku, M. P., Elhoweris, H., Alhosani, N. M., Moustafa, A., Alkhateri, T., & Nketsia, W. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22736 · Cited by 17
Mato‐Santiso, V., Rey‐García, M., & Pérez, M. J. S. (2023) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.21579 · Cited by 8
Occupational therapists' acceptance of 3D printing
Barter, S. L., Williams, A. J., Rencken, G., Ndaba, N., & Govender, P. (2023) · South African Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.17159/2310-3833/2023/vol53n2a2 · Cited by 8
SMUPI-BIS: a synthesis model for users’ perceived impact of business intelligence systems
Nasir, I. S., Mousa, A., & Alsammak, I. L. H. (2021) · Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v21.i3.pp1856-1867 · Cited by 12
Thành, N. V., Yoon, H., & Hwang, J. (2018) · The International Technology Management Review · doi:10.2991/itmr.2018.7.2.2 · Cited by 8
Coleman, A., & Iyawa, G. E. (2015) · International Science and Technology Journal of Namibia · Cited by 7
Gui, A., Ryan, Lay, W. B., Chia, J. J., & Chanda, R. C. (2024) · International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA) · doi:10.1109/icodsa62899.2024.10651702 · Cited by 7
Zotorvie, J. S. T., Fiagborlo, J. D., & Kudo, M. B. (2025) · Journal of Money and Business · doi:10.1108/jmb-09-2024-0054 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S.-C., Li, S.-H., & Li, C.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Tatung University (TW)
- ORCID
- Chen, Shih-Chih
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Business and Management Research
- Published
- 2012-04-05
- Volume
- 01
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 124-127
- ISSN
- 1839-0846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2292347450
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Business and Management Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, user acceptance, information systems, user interface design, electronic services, mobile data services, self-service technology, online learning, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review