Cited by 30Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence Applications

Attitude of Nursing Students towards Artificial Intelligence

Open access
J., Sheela·2022·International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research

Abstract

The present study was aimed to assess the attitude of nursing students towards artificial intelligence. The objectives of the study were to assess the attitude of nursing students on artificial intelligence & to find the association between attitude towards artificial intelligence and socio demographic variables. The study was conducted among nursing students from selected nursing colleges, Bengaluru with sample size of 189, selected using convenience sampling method. A quantitative non-experimental approach was chosen for the study. The attitude of nursing students regarding artificial intelligence was assessed using structured questionnaire. The result with regard to attitude revealed that 63% of nursing students had unfavorable attitude and 37% had favorable attitude towards artificial intelligence. The Chi-square test revealed that the association between demographic variables and attitude on artificial intelligence. It showed that there was a no significant association between nursing course, age, previous knowledge and source of information with the attitude of the nursing students on artificial intelligence. Keywords: attitude, nursing students, artificial intelligence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52403/ijshr.20220447

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
J., S.
Affiliations
HOD - OBG Nursing, R V College of Nursing & PhD Scholar, Shri JJTU University, Jhunjhunu.
Venue
International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research
Published
2022-06-30
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
334-347
ISSN
2455-7587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283762421
Cited by
26
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence, nursing students, attitudes toward AI, nursing education, sociodemographic factors, technology acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review