The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychosocial factors at work and subsequent depressive symptoms in the Gazel cohort
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study attempted to establish whether psychosocial factors at work are predictors of depressive symptoms in a prospective cohort of men and women employed in a wide variety of occupations by the French national company Electricité De France - Gaz De France (EDF-GDF). METHODS: This prospective cohort study followed the Gazel cohort by means of annual self-administered questionnaires and independent data obtained from the medical and personnel departments of the company. The self-administered questionnaire, in 1995, provided information about the psychosocial work environment characteristics, psychological job demands, decision latitude, and social support at work. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale in the 1996 questionnaire. Potential confounding variables were age, marital status, and number of children, assessed in the 1995 questionnaire, stressful personal and occupational events during the previous 12 months, assessed in the 1996 questionnaire, and educational level, occupation and previous absenteeism for mental disorders, assessed from the independent data provided by EDF-GDF. The subjects were 11 552 workers (8422 men aged 46-56 years in 1995 and 3130 women aged 41-56 years) who answered the 1995 and 1996 questionnaires and were working during this period. RESULTS: High levels of psychological demands, low levels of decision latitude, and low levels of social support at work were significant predictors of subsequent depressive symptoms in both the men and the women. These results were unchanged after adjustment for potential confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results strongly support the possibility that psychosocial factors at work are predictive of depressive symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Service utilization and social morbidity associated with depressive symptoms in the community
Johnson, J. (1992) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480110054033 · Cited by 726
Cited by
Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review
Stansfeld, S., & Candy, B. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1050 · Cited by 1,875
“The summary odds ratio for the three studies that identified decision latitude (35, 74, 75), as opposed to decision authority or skill discretion, was 1.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialA systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms
Theorell, T., Hammarström, A., Aronsson, G., Träskman Bendz, L., Grape, T., Hogstedt, C., Marteinsdottir, I., Skoog, I., & Hall, C. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1954-4 · Cited by 982
Bonde, J. P. E. (2008) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2007.038430 · Cited by 919
Work Stress and Employee Health: A Multidisciplinary Review
Ganster, D. C., & Rosen, C. C. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313475815 · Cited by 831
Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review
Michie, S., & Williams, S. (2003) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.60.1.3 · Cited by 816
Metadata
- Authors
- Niedhammer, I., Goldberg, M., Leclerc, A., Bugel, I., & David, S.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-205
- ISSN
- 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
- 1795-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2328128114
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychosocial factors at work and subsequent depressive symptoms in the Gazel cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5271/sjweh.299
- The paper
- Niedhammer, I., Goldberg, M., Leclerc, A., Bugel, I., & David, S. (1998). Psychosocial factors at work and subsequent depressive symptoms in the Gazel cohort. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.