Cited by 66Workplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout ResearchMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Effects of a stress management intervention on absenteeism and return to work – results from a randomized wait-list controlled trial

Open access
Willert, Morten Vejs, Thulstrup, Ane Marie, Bonde, Jens Peter·2011·Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High levels of work-related stress are associated with increased absenteeism from work and reduced work ability. In this study, we investigated the effects of a stress management intervention on absenteeism and return to work. METHODS: We randomized 102 participants into either the intervention or wait-list control (WLC) group. The intervention group received the intervention in weeks 1-16 from baseline, and the WLC group received the intervention in weeks 17-32. Self-reported data on absenteeism (number of days full- or part-time absent from work within the previous three months) were obtained at 16, 32, and 48 weeks follow-up. Register-based data on long-term absence from work were drawn from the Danish public transfer payments (DREAM) database from baseline and 48 weeks onwards. The DREAM database contains weekly information on long-term sickness absence compensation. The threshold to enter DREAM is sick leave for two consecutive weeks. RESULTS: At follow-up in week 16, self-reported absenteeism in the intervention group [median 11 days (range 3-25)] was lower (P=0.02) than in the WLC group [median 45 days (range 19-60)], corresponding to a 29% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5-52] reduction. On register-based data (cumulated weeks in DREAM, weeks 1-16), the intervention group median [6 weeks (range 0-11)] was lower than that of the WLC group [median 12 weeks (range 8-16)], though not significantly (P=0.06), corresponding to a 21% (95% CI 0-42) reduction. For return to work, a hazard ratio of 1.58 (95% CI 0.89-2.81) favoring the intervention group was found (P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention reduces self-reported absenteeism from work. A similar trend was found from register-based records. No conclusive evidence was found for return to work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5271/sjweh.3130

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willert, M. V., Thulstrup, A. M., & Bonde, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Published
2010-11-08
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
186-195
ISSN
  • 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1795-990X
OpenAlex
W2117863160
Cited by
66
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
stress management interventions, occupational stress, absenteeism, sick leave, return to work, work ability
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adult, Denmark, Employment, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Waiting Lists, Work, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Databases, Factual, Sick Leave, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review