Cited by 56Stress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-beingMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Changes in stress and coping from a randomized controlled trial of a three-month stress management intervention

Open access
Willert, Morten Vejs, Thulstrup, Ane Marie, Hertz, Janne, Bonde, Jens Peter·2009·Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a group-based stress management intervention, based on principles from cognitive behaviour therapy, can reduce stress and alter coping strategies in an occupationally diverse population with extensive symptoms of work-related stress. METHODS: Using a randomized wait list control design, 102 participants were divided into two groups: intervention and wait list control (WLC). The intervention was a three-month group-based stress management program. Outcomes measures were the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10, range 0-40 points) and five dimensions from the Brief COPE questionnaire (range 2-8 points) at baseline and three-, six- and nine-months follow-up. Data were analyzed with a univariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: On the PSS-10 from baseline to three months, the intervention group changed -6.45 (95% CI -8.25--4.64) points, compared to -1.12 (95% CI -2.94-0.70) points in the WLC group. The between-groups difference was -5.32 (95% CI -7.89--2.76) points, equalling a standardized mean difference of -0.84 (95% CI -1.27--0.42) favouring the intervention. One coping dimension, positive reframing, differed between the two groups. Here the intervention group changed -0.86 (95% CI -1.25--0.48) points from baseline to three months, compared to -0.18 (-0.58-0.22) points in the WLC-group. We found a between-groups difference of -0.67 (95% CI -1.24--0.11) points, equalling a standardized mean difference of -0.48 (95% CI -0.89--0.07) favouring the intervention. The gains achieved during treatment were maintained when followed up three months later. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment is superior to the control condition in positively affecting perceived stress and positive reframing. When followed up, the gains achieved are maintained.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5271/sjweh.1313

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. de Jong GM, Emmelkamp PGM. Implementing a stress man- agement training: comparing trainer effectiveness. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(2):309-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willert, M. V., Thulstrup, A. M., Hertz, J., & Bonde, J. P.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Published
2009-03
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
145-152
ISSN
  • 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1795-990X
OpenAlex
W2117237051
Cited by
56
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Aarhus Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
stress management interventions, occupational stress, coping strategies, positive reframing, perceived stress, cognitive behavioral therapy, group intervention, occupational health, maintenance therapy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Occupational Diseases, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review