Cited by 49Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific

Open access
IPBES·2018·Zenodo

Abstract

The Regional Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Asia and the Pacific produced by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provides a critical analysis of the state of knowledge regarding the importance, status, and trends of biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people. The assessment analyses the direct and underlying causes for the observed changes in biodiversity and in nature’s contributions to people, and the impact that these changes have on the quality of life of people. The assessment, finally, identifies a mix of governance options, policies and management practices that are currently available to reduce the loss of biodiversity and of nature’s contributions to people in that region. The assessment addresses terrestrial, freshwater, and coastal biodiversity and covers current status and trends, going back in time several decades, and future projections, with a focus on the 2020-2050 period.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.3237373

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intensive use of land has been the dominant driver of the accelerating loss of terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

    “The intensive use of land, with the extraction of wood, agricultural commodities, and water, has until now been the dominant driver of degradation and desertification, as well as the associated accelerating loss of terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (1,2).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Intensive use of land, with extraction of wood, agricultural commodities, and water, has been the dominant driver of degradation and desertification.

    “The intensive use of land, with the extraction of wood, agricultural commodities, and water, has until now been the dominant driver of degradation and desertification, as well as the associated accelerating loss of terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (1,2).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [2]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
IPBES
Corresponding author
IPBES
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2018-03-24
OpenAlex
W6930941660
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
biodiversity, ecosystem services, nature's contributions to people, biodiversity loss, drivers of biodiversity change, terrestrial biodiversity, freshwater biodiversity, coastal biodiversity, biodiversity governance, biodiversity policy, Asia-Pacific region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review