Cited by 1Climate variability and modelsClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and Environmental Impact

Simple climate model

Open access
Persson, U. Martin, Johansson, Daniel J.A.·2022·Zenodo

Abstract

This Excel-file contains a simple climate model that can be used to assess climate impacts, in terms of radiative forcing and global mean temperature change, from an emission profile of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). It is an update of the model used for the publication by Persson et al. (2015), and has been revised to reflect the equations and parametrizations used for estimating greenhouse gas metrics in the latest IPCC assessment (Forster & Storelvmo et al. 2021), including the carbon cycle feedback effects of CH4 and N2O emissions. To use the model, enter emission pathways for carbon dioxide (column B), methane (column O), and nitrous oxide (column AF), and the model calculates the resulting impacts in terms of radiative forcing (columns L, AC, and AT, respectively) and temperature change (columns M, AD, and AU, respectively). As is, the model is run with a pulse emission of one ton for each gas in year 1, which means the results can be used to estimate the Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Global Temperature Potential (GTP) for methane and nitrous oxide (columns AW-AZ). Note that the model is a linearized representation of more complex climate models, and as such should be used to assess the climate impacts for small perturbations (i.e., project level emissions scenarios). For larger perturbations (e.g., regional or global emission scenarios) a model that includes the non-linear responses of the climate system (e.g., on greenhouse gas lifetimes and radiative forcings), such as the FAIR model (Smith et al. 2017, 2018) should be used.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.5957222

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One tonne of carbon sequestered can offset the radiative forcing of a continuous emission of 0.04 kg nitrous oxide per year over 500 years.

    “In other words, a one-off sequestration of one t of C would offset the RF of a continuous emission of 0.1 kg N2O per year over 100 years or 0.04 kg N2O per year over 500 years.”
  • The radiative forcing of a pulse emission of one tonne of CO2 decreases from 0.0017 in year one to 0.0007 nW m−2 in year 100, and 0.0005 nW m−2 in year 500.

    “The RF of a pulse emission of one t of CO2, for example, decreases from 0.0017 in year one to 0.0007 nW m−2 in year 100, and 0.0005 nW m−2 in year 500.”
  • The radiative forcing of one tonne of CH4 drops from 0.2 nW m−2 in year one to 0.0003 nW m−2 in year 100 and 0.00005 nW m−2 in year 500.

    “Meanwhile, the RF of one t of CH4, as a result of its relative short perturbation lifetime, drops drastically within a few decades (i.e., from 0.2 nW m−2 in year one to 0.0003 nW m−2 in year 100 and 0.00005 nW m−2 in year 500).”
  • The radiative forcing associated with a pulse emission of one tonne of N2O is 0.36 nW m−2 in year one and 0.005 nW m−2 in year 500.

    “The RF associated with a pulse emission of one t of N2O gradually reduces over time and lasts for more than half a millennium (i.e., 0.36 nW m−2 in year one and 0.005 nW m−2 in year 500) (Fig. 1a).”
  • One tonne of carbon sequestered can offset the radiative forcing of a continuous emission of 0.99 kg methane per year over 100 years.

    “Here, our analysis shows that one tonne of carbon sequestrated can offset radiative forcing of a continuous emission of 0.99 kg methane or 0.1 kg nitrous oxide per year over 100 years.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Persson, U. M., & Johansson, D. J. A.
Affiliations
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2022-02-03
OpenAlex
W6893888366
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
Type
software
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
climate models, radiative forcing, global mean temperature change, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, global warming potential, carbon cycle feedbacks, emission scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review