The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Literature Review for the Type of Interview in Qualitative Research
Open accessAbstract
In carrying out qualitative studies, the important issue is the quality of data collected, which is dependent on the mode of data collection used. The interview is one of the data collection techniques for qualitative researchers. Distinct from other methods, interviews have unique features that make them superior. As such, the current study explores relevant issues that are linked to interviews, especially aspects that make them central to qualitative data collection. Besides the historical appeal, the discussion covers the advantages a researcher experiences while using interviews to collect data. They require a personal commitment of both the participant and researcher. Significantly, time and resource allocation are also required. With the emerging technology, implementation of the interview process is becoming flexible thus moving away from the rigid face to face mode. Besides their strengths, there are also challenges and ethical dilemmas that are linked to interviews. As a perfect qualitative data collection method, researchers have professional issues that they have a deal with throughout the process. The link between all these issues is the subject area of the current discussion, which tackles each factor separately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
(2017) · Cited by 16,036
Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1319 · Cited by 10,543
The qualitative research interview
DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x · Cited by 4,995
Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/bdj.2008.192 · Cited by 2,685
Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation
Jamshed, S. (2014) · Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.4103/0976-0105.141942 · Cited by 1,286
Ethics in Qualitative Research
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x · Cited by 1,256
Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research
Opdenakker, R. (2008) · Forum qualitative Sozialforschung · doi:10.17169/fqs-7.4.175 · Cited by 1,148
Introduction to Library Trends 46 (4) Spring 1998: Qualitative Research
Maylone, T. M. (1998) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1,100
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Bryden, E. (2010) · Sight and Life Magazine: Issue 1/2010 · doi:10.52439/uzxe5427 · Cited by 1,023
Cited by
Bayeck, R. Y. (2021) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406921995696 · Cited by 30
Catubigan, R. V. (2023) · Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education · doi:10.2478/dcse-2023-0006 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Adhabi, E. A. R., & Anozie, C. B. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Education
- Publisher
- Macrothink Institute, Inc.
- Published
- 2017-09-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 86
- ISSN
- 1948-5476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2760518438
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 24.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Literature Review for the Type of Interview in Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5296/ije.v9i3.11483
- The paper
- Adhabi, E. A. R., & Anozie, C. B. L. (2017). Literature Review for the Type of Interview in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v9i3.11483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.