CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 335Ancient Near East HistoryBiblical Studies and InterpretationHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Babylonian Creation Myths

Lambert, Wilfred G.·2013·Penn State University Press eBooks
DOI 10.5325/j.ctv18r6rfr
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5325/j.ctv18r6rfr

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–335 of 335

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lambert, W. G.
Corresponding author
Lambert, Wilfred G.
Venue
Penn State University Press eBooks
Publisher
Penn State University Press
Published
2013
DOI
10.5325/j.ctv18r6rfr
OpenAlex
W4299972664
Cited by
197
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
9.67
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Penn State University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
Babylonian creation myth, Mesopotamian mythology, cosmogony, Babylonian religion, ancient Near Eastern literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review