Cited by 29Archaeological Research and ProtectionGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

An explorative application of random forest algorithm for archaeological predictive modeling. A swiss case study

Open access
Castiello, Maria Elena, Tonini, Marj·2021·Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology

Abstract

The present work proposes an innovative approach to surveys and demonstrates the effectiveness of bringing together traditional archaeological questions, such as the exploration and the analysis of settlement patterns, with the most innovative technologies related to Machine Learning. Namely, we applied Random Forest, an ensemble learning method based on decision trees, to perform archaeological predictive modeling (APM) for the Canton of Zurich, in Switzerland. This was done based on a dataset of known archaeological sites dating back to the Roman Age. The APM represents an automated decision-making and probabilistic reasoning tool that is relevant for archaeological risk assessment and cultural heritage management. Machine learning-based approaches can learn from data and make predictions, starting from the acquired knowledge, through the modeling of the hidden relationships between a set of observations, representing the dependent variable (i.e. the archeological sites), and the independent variables (i.e. the geo-environmental features prone to influence the site locations). The main objective of the present study is to assess the spatial probability of presence for Roman settlements within the study area. As results, we produced: 1) a probability map, expressing the likelihood of finding a Roman site at different locations; 2) the importance ranking of the geo-environmental features influencing the presence of the archeological sites. These outputs in our results are of paramount importance, not only in verifying the reliability of the data, but also in stimulating experts in different ways. Also, these results help evaluate the benefits and constraints of using such innovative techniques and, ultimately, help explore the performance of machine learning-based models in processing archaeological information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/jcaa.71

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 2015, Mathematics and Archaeology
  2. 1962, La Suisse à l’époque romaine
  3. 2018, Breiman and Cutler’s Random Forests for Classification and Regression
  4. 2017, Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Using R (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology)
  5. 2013, arXiv:1301.2738 · arXiv
  6. 2012, The Encyclopedia of Ancient History
  7. 2015, Eine Potentialkarte Archäologie für den Kanton Bern, Archäologie Bern/Archéologie Bernoise, Jahrbuch des Archäologischen Dienstes des Kantons Bern, 212
  8. 1995, Der römische Gutshof in Dietikon, Zürich/Egg
  9. 2002, Die Schweiz vom Paläolithikum bis zum Mittelalter (SPM) V: Römische Zeit, 135
  10. Kunow & Müller, 2003, Symposium on the archaeology of landscapes and geographic information systems. Predictive maps, settlement dynamics and space and territory in prehistory, 119
  11. 2002, La Suisse du Paléolithique à l’âube du Moyen-Age Vol. 5 Epoque romaine
  12. 2001, Die Schweiz zur Zeit der Römer
  13. 2018, Classificare le ceramiche: dai metodi tradizionali all’intelligenza artificiale. L’esperienza del progetto europeo ArchAIDE, Archeologia Quo Vadis? Riflessioni Metodologiche sul future di una disciplina. Atti del Workshop Internazionale Catania, 18–19 Gennaio 2018
  14. 2010, CAA2014 Proceedings, 1
  15. 2000, Applied Logistic Regression
  16. 2012, L’archéologie des grands travaux, 77
  17. 2005, Predictive Modelling for Archaeological Heritage Management: A research agenda, 13
  18. 1990, Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: A Flexible Framework, 275
  19. 2000, Beyond the Map. Archaeology and Spatial Technologies
  20. 2005, Predictive Modelling for Archaeological Heritage Management: a research agenda
  21. 2007, Case studies in archaeological predictive modelling
  22. 2020, Archaeological Spatial Analysis: A Methodological Guide, 231
  23. 1999, Practical applications of GIS for archaeologists: A predictive modeling kit
  24. 2011, Framing the Early Middle Ages: Europe and the Mediterranean, 400–800

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castiello, M. E., & Tonini, M.
Venue
Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Published
2021
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
110-125
ISSN
2514-8362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165170369
Cited by
29
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysical Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
archaeological predictive modeling, random forest, Roman settlement, settlement patterns, probability maps, feature importance ranking, archaeological risk assessment, heritage management, Canton of Zurich, Roman Age

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review