Cited by 42Impact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourGender and Technology in Education

A Comparative Study of Mobile Internet Usage between the U.S. and Korea

Open access
Shin, Luke Yunkeun·2014·Journal of European Psychology Students

Abstract

The introduction of smartphones illuminated mobile internet prevalence, highlighting nomophobia. This study explored the mobile internet usage dependency of Korean and U.S. mobile users and investigated the severity of such usage dependency and the factors involved. In the combined data set, it was found that Korean users have higher usage dependency levels than US users and that students, unemployed users, and younger generations are more susceptible to mobile internet usage dependency. When comparing the two countries as separate data sets Korean females present as having higher usage dependency levels. In the U.S., it is students and younger generation groups who present with higher usage dependency levels. Regression analysis found that frequency of access has higher associations with mobile internet usage dependency than usage length. country of origin and age are significantly associated with mobile internet usage dependency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/jeps.cg

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have noted a greater prevalence of cell-phone addiction in Middle East (Iran) and East Asian populations, specifically in Korea where university students showed a greater level of dependence (11.15%) than Americans (6.36%).

    “although some studies have noted a greater prevalence in Middle East (Iran) and East Asian populations, specifically in Korea where university students showed a greater level of dependence (11.15%) than the Americans (6.36%) (85).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [85]

  • Instruments and studies have evolved from the study of global cell-phone use behavior toward specific behaviors, such as using smartphones, mobile Internet, social networks, Facebook, text messages, WhatsApp, or nomophobia.

    “In general, these instruments and studies have evolved from the study of global cell-phone use behavior toward specific behaviors, such as using smartphones (60, 102), mobile Internet (85), social networks in general (27, 118, 119), Facebook in particular (27, 95), text messages (88, 89), and WhatsApp (63) or the consequences of such behaviors, i.e., nomophobia (99).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [85]

  • Some authors have based their research on the criteria of Internet addiction or general behavioral addiction, which had clear support on the criteria established from substance abuse research.

    “Some authors have based their research on the criteria of Internet addiction or general behavioral addiction, which had a clear support on the criteria established from substance abuse research (34, 80, 85, 88, 91, 95, 96, 102).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [85]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Casey, B. (2012). Linking Psychological Attributes to Smart Phone Addiction, Face-to-Face Communication, Present Absence and Social Capital. (Master's thesis, Chinese University Hong Kong). Retrieved from http://pg.com. cuhk.edu.hk/pgp_nm/projects/2012/BIAN%20 Mengwei%20Casey.pdf Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Associa- tion. (2012). Wireless Quick Facts. Retrieved from http://www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/ aid/10323 Chosunilbo. (2012). Kakao Talk Daily Traffic Hits 3 Billion. Retrieved from http://english.chosun.com/site/data/ html_dir/2012/07/27/2012072701392.html
  2. White, M. (2011). Internet Addiction: A Review of Asso- ciated Health Hazards, Retrieved from http://www. myhealthyhome.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ Tech-Invasion-Internet-Addiction.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, L. Y.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Shin, Luke Yunkeun
Venue
Journal of European Psychology Students
Published
2014-08-26
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
46-55
ISSN
2222-6931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111890769
Cited by
42
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of European Psychology Students (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • European Federation of Psychology Students Associations: EFPSA - Journal of European Psychology Students (JEPS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
mobile internet use, nomophobia, smartphones, cross-national comparison, United States, South Korea, students, age differences, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review