Cited by 1Copyright and Intellectual PropertyLegal Systems and InstitutionsMusic History and Culture

The Economic Impact of Music Streaming

Open access
Gantchev, Dimiter·2025·Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika

Abstract

Streaming has established itself as the predominant model for music distribution. It brings undisputed benefits through its global outreach and appeal, speed and convenience, and innovative revenue-generating potential. These benefits are, however, not distributed equally among the stakeholders. The issues of revenue distribution, pricing, transparency, metadata, overall industry effects, and impact on consumption, among others, are posing serious questions about the efficiency of the streaming model and its overall impact on the music industry. The article reviews the literature and stakeholder views on this topic and analyzes the various economic and non-economic effects of streaming to provide a balanced overview of music streaming. It discusses the elements to be considered in a robust policy on streaming and provides recommendations for a more sustainable growth model for the music industry. A key element in this policy remains the balanced copyright framework, which needs to address the interests of the various stakeholders in music. The research methods used in this article are a comparative analysis of business practices and data, a review and analysis of legal and stakeholder initiatives, a comparison of existing theoretical and practical approaches in the economic, legal, and business literature, and research on the topic. The research findings point to several inefficiencies in music streaming in its current form and frame the question of whether the problem is in the music streaming model or its current application.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The article reviews literature and stakeholder data on music streaming, arguing that streaming now dominates music distribution but distributes benefits unevenly across artists, labels, platforms, and rights holders. It identifies inefficiencies in revenue distribution, pricing, transparency, metadata, consumption, and industry structure, and concludes that a balanced copyright framework is central to a more sustainable model.

Key findings

  • Streaming is dominant: over 713.4 million people worldwide use streaming services; streaming revenues rose 15 times in the last decade; the market was projected to reach 29.6 bln USD by end-2024 at 4.7% CAGR, and 1.1 bln users by 2027 with 14.1% penetration. IFPI 2023 data show streaming at 63.7% of global revenue, subscription streaming revenue growth of 11.2%, physical formats 17.8%, and live performances 9.5%; RIAA reports streaming contributed about 84% of US total revenues for the fifth year, with paid subscriptions growing 4% to $5.7 billion and accounting for 78% of streaming revenues.
  • Revenue distribution is highly concentrated and contested: Ramesh (2024) found the top 1% of artists accounted for 78% of all streams and 83% of streaming revenue in 2023, with an average per-stream rate of $0.004; 90% of surveyed artists said streaming was over 50% of their music-related income, up from 30% five years earlier, and 68% said overall music income had decreased since streaming dominance. GEMA (2022) found only 15% of net German streaming revenues went to the song, 55% to the recording side (42.4% labels, 12.7% performers), and streaming services retained 30% of subscription fees.
  • ARPU has generally fallen: the paper’s table shows Spotify global ARPU at 4.40–6.84 USD in 2024 versus 5.12–6.20 USD in 2020; North America/Europe at 6–8 USD in 2024 versus 7–8 USD in 2020; Apple Music at 8–10 USD in 2024 versus 9–10 USD in 2020. It also reports that 30% of intensive streaming listeners generate 70% of total streams and therefore dictate where 70% of money goes under pro-rata, while newer models include user-centric and artist-centric payment systems.
  • Transparency, metadata, consumption, and AI are unresolved: playlists and algorithms remain obscure; CISAC/PMP (2024) found 41% of the top 100 Spotify playlists by subscribers are functional/mood playlists favoring passive listening; tracks uploaded to DSPs averaged 143,000/day in 2024, 125,000 in 2023, and 100,000 in 2022. Fully Gen AI outputs in music are expected to be worth about €16Bn in 2028, doubling on average each year, and 100% AI-generated music is already streamed on DSPs.

Methods

  • The article is a literature review and comparative analysis, not an original empirical study. It compares business practices and data, reviews legal and stakeholder initiatives, and compares theoretical and practical approaches in economic, legal, and business literature.
  • It draws on secondary sources including IFPI, RIAA, CISAC, Statista, GEMA, DCMS, CMA, MIDiA, WIPO, and academic studies on streaming economics, artist remuneration, consumption, and copyright.
  • The analysis is organized around market data, revenue distribution, pricing, transparency, metadata, consumption, industry structure, efficiency, and artificial intelligence.

Limitations

  • The paper does not include a formal limitations section; it notes one unresolved quantification: the impact of AI-generated tracks “in terms of the volume of tracks and streams, has yet to be quantified.”
  • Evident from the text: the study relies on secondary reports and stakeholder data rather than original surveys, experiments, or causal identification, so its findings inherit the gaps and possible biases of those sources.
  • Evident from the text: the provided ARPU table is partially malformed/incomplete, which limits reproducibility of those specific figures.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53656/str2025-1s-6-the

Cites

0 citation errors · 4 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 50 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    The majority of artists today can't profit from streaming revenues only.

    “The majority of artists today can't profit from streaming revenues only.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Over the last decade, there has been a decrease in the Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) from streaming.

    “However, over the last decade, there has been a decrease in the Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) from streaming.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    ARPU is considerably higher where paid and premium services prevail.

    “The second conclusion is that ARPU is considerably higher, whereas paid and premium services prevail.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Streaming has established itself as the predominant model for music distribution.

    “Streaming has established itself as the predominant model for music distribution.”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Streaming and the music market today · plain
      “Streaming accounts for two-thirds of the worldwide music market, and this format's growth has been uninterrupted for over 10 years.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IFPI 2024 Global Music Report

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    The shift to streaming has led to a 5% increase in the number of new artists entering the market each year.

    “According to research, the shift to streaming has led to a 5% increase in the number of new artists entering the market each year (National Bureau of Economic Research 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Bureau of Economic Research 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims. 79
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 90
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Spotify became profit-making only in 2024, showing that the conversion rate to paid subscriptions has not been sufficiently pronounced.

    “The fact that Spotify became profit-making only in 2024 clearly shows that the conversion rate to paid subscriptions has not been sufficiently pronounced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Record labels pay artists under the terms of their contracts, but they are subject to non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).

    “Record labels pay artists under the terms of their contracts, but they are subject to non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Streaming is already well established and currently the dominant format for music distribution, adopted by all regions.

    “First, streaming is already well established and currently the dominant format for music distribution, adopted by all regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    On-demand streaming services undermine sales of digital files and physical media and are not a financial model that can sustain musical careers.

    “On-demand streaming services undermine sales of digital files and physical media and are not a financial model that can sustain musical careers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning

    These agreements are complex, if not impossible, to audit.

    “These agreements are complex, if not impossible, to audit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    CMOs still use sampling methods based on radio and TV play to estimate royalty distribution, which can favor established artists and misrepresent actual streaming data.

    “Finally, CMOs still use sampling methods based on radio and TV play to estimate royalty distribution, which can favor established artists and misrepresent actual streaming data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Currently, the system of agreements often results in delayed payments when it can take months for royalties to reach artists.

    “Currently, the system of agreements often results in delayed payments when it can take months for royalties to reach artists.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The most important part of the music streaming chain-how money moves from intermediaries to artists-is also the least transparent part of the distribution process.

    “The most important part of the music streaming chain -how money moves from the intermediaries to artists -is also the least transparent part of the distribution process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On most streaming platforms the ARPU has fallen over time, which means that artists are getting less as the total income per user decreases.

    “The first conclusion that this table suggests is that on most streaming platforms the ARPU has fallen over time, which means that artists are getting less as the total income per user decreases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Streaming did not have an immediate positive effect on the music industry; initially it decreased profits, but then the sector adjusted and increased returns from the new consumption model.

    “Streaming did not have an immediate positive effect on the music industry.Initially, it decreased profits in the industry as a whole, but then the sector adjusted and managed to increase its returns from this new consumption model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning

    Products are difficult to find for less famous artists if they are not on the playlist.

    “Their products are difficult to find for less famous artists if they are not on the playlist.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Findingnone given

    The digital music business involves many components which are not very transparent.

    “The digital music business involves many components which are not very transparent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    These tools remain obscure for music creators and fans.

    “However, these tools remain obscure for music creators and fans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Music may be categorized automatically into a genre that does not reflect the creator's intentions correctly.

    “Their music may also be categorized automatically into a genre that does not reflect the creator's intentions correctly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Per-stream royalty rates on some platforms are rather low, which forces artists to rely more on touring, merchandise sales, and other revenue streams to make a living.

    “The per-stream royalty rates on some platforms are rather low, which forces artists to rely more on touring, merchandise sales, and other revenue streams to make a living.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Digitization allowed individuals to produce music using affordable hardware and software and distribute it via streaming services, breaking the need for expensive promotion and distribution.

    “Digitization allowed individuals to produce music using affordable hardware and software tools and to distribute it via streaming services, thus breaking the need for expensive promotion and distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This trend is likely to stay as other formats are either decreasing or marginally increasing, and one develops at the expense of others.

    “Second, this trend is likely to stay as other formats are either decreasing or marginally increasing, and one develops at the expense of others -while radio and TV income drops, there is an increase in revenue from live performances, while publishing income and synchronization stays stable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aguiar and Waldfogel found that growth in streaming reduced sales of albums and that an additional thousand streams depress sales revenue by 1.76 USD.

    “Aguiar and Waldfogel researched at the country level and found that growth in streaming reduced sales of albums and that an additional thousand streams depress sales revenue by 1.76 USD (Aguiar & Waldfogel 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aguiar & Waldfogel 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Streaming services benefit different stakeholders by increasing music discovery, attracting consumers to other areas of the music market, and positively combating music piracy.

    “Streaming services benefit different stakeholders by increasing music discovery, attracting consumers to other areas of the music market, and positively combating music piracy (Zehr 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zehr 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Streaming accounts for two-thirds of the worldwide music market, and this format's growth has been uninterrupted for over 10 years.

    “Streaming accounts for two-thirds of the worldwide music market, and this format's growth has been uninterrupted for over 10 years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Competition in the market is intensifying, and while Spotify still dominates the market, new dynamics should not be excluded in the years to come.

    “Third, competition in the market is intensifying, and while Spotify still dominates the market, we should not exclude new dynamics in the years to come.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dumont found that the pro-rata distribution model leads to cross-subsidization between low and high streaming users, streaming fraud, and inequity in compensation for artists.

    “Dumont analyzed the consequences of the pro-rata distribution model leading to cross-subsidization between low and high streaming users, streaming fraud, and inequity in compensation for artists (Dumont 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dumont 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IFPI states that in 2023 the streaming share of global revenue was 63.7%, with growth in subscription streaming revenue of 11.2%.

    “The annual report of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) states that in 2023, the streaming share of global revenue was 63,7%, with growth in subscription streaming revenue of 11,2% (IFPI 2024 Global Music Report).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IFPI 2024 Global Music Report

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These reviews concluded that performers are not currently entitled to a fair split of streaming revenue, deeming this unfair considering the marginal costs of production and distribution associated with digital consumption.

    “These reviews concluded that performers are not currently entitled to a fair split of streaming revenue, deeming this unfair considering the marginal costs of production and distribution associated with digital consumption.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites DCMS report 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites CMA 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Page and Safir concluded that listening intensity and concentration are key in deciding which remuneration model to choose.

    “According to this research, listening intensity and concentration are key in deciding which remuneration model to choose -a pro-rata or a user-centric payment model (Page and Safir 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Page and Safir 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The streaming market has been dominated by Spotify, the biggest streaming platform with over 30% of the market share, followed by Tencent Music, Apple Music, Amazon, and others.

    “The streaming market has been dominated by Spotify, the biggest streaming platform with over 30% of the market share, followed by Tencent Music, Apple Music, Amazon, and others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    63% of the total income generated by music goes to artists and labels, and 37% goes to songwriters, publishers, and their CMOs.

    “63% of the total income generated by music goes to artists and labels, and 37% goes to songwriters, publishers, and their CMOs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    RIAA data show that in the US alone, streaming contributed approximately 84% of total revenues for the fifth year, with paid subscriptions outpacing other types.

    “According to data from the Recording Industry Association of America, RIAA in the US alone, streaming has contributed approximately 84% of total revenues for the fifth year, with paid subscriptions outpacing other types in this category.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites RIAA, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Much less attention has been paid in the literature to adverse economic effects associated with music streaming as a way of monetizing creative outputs.

    “While the benefits of streaming have been widely discussed, much less attention has been paid in the literature to some of the adverse economic effects associated with music streaming as a way of monetizing creative outputs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the predominant streams are based on ad-revenue and are not generating sufficient profits, then the streaming model cannot be sustained in its current form in the long run.

    “If the predominant streams are based on add-revenue and are not generating sufficient profits, then the streaming model, in the long run, cannot be sustained in its current form.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    According to CISAC data, the approximate average number of tracks uploaded to DSPs each day is 143,000 in 2024, 125,000 in 2023, and 100,000 in 2022.

    “According to CISAC data, the approximate average number of tracks uploaded to DSPs each day is 143,000 (2024), 125,000 (2023), and 100,000 (2022) (CISAC and PMP, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CISAC and PMP, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Zehr suggested that streaming increased revenue in the live music market and could compensate for some potential losses and provide benefits to all artists.

    “Zehr suggested that streaming increased revenue in the live music market and could compensate for some of the potential losses and provide benefits to all artists (Zehr 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zehr 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The largest consumers of digital music through streaming are young people, who are primarily price-sensitive.

    “As mentioned, the largest consumers of digital music through streaming are young people, who are primarily price-sensitive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The low per-stream rates may disincentivize investment in new, riskier musical projects, favoring established formats and back catalogs.

    “-the low per-stream rates may disincentivize investment in new, riskier musical projects, favoring established formats and back catalogs;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These regions could impact the global music landscape for artists to reach wider audiences.

    “These regions could impact the global music landscape for artists to reach wider audiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The strategy of streaming platforms seems to be that consumption of the public goes from a storage culture to a streaming culture.

    “The strategy of streaming platforms seems to be that the consumption of the public goes from a storage culture to a streaming culture (Hajis 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hajis 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Compensation also depends on the existing copyright legislation.

    “The compensation also depends on the existing copyright legislation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A logical consequence of oversupply and shorter attention spans is that we see more quantity than quality.

    “A logical consequence is that we see more quantity than quality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The payment systems described cannot solve the problems of different stakeholders automatically.

    “Regarding payment systems, it must be noted that the models described above cannot solve the problems of different stakeholders automatically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The UK Voluntary Code of Practice on Transparency in Music Streaming was published in January 2024.

    “A good example is the new UK Voluntary Code of Practice on Transparency in Music Streaming, published in January 2024.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites https://www.gov.uk/guidance/uk-vol-untary-code-of-good-practice-on-transparency-in-music-streaming

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    With the shift towards digital music consumption, the physical aspect of music, such as album art, liner notes, and collectible editions, has diminished.

    “With the shift towards digital music consumption, the physical aspect of music, such as album art, liner notes, and collectible editions, has diminished.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Streaming has affected music consumption and brought in more assisted and standardized choices among consumers.

    “Streaming has affected music consumption and brought in more”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Fully Gen AI outputs in Music are expected to be worth about 16 billion euros in 2028, doubling on average each year.

    “Fully Gen AI outputs in Music are expected to be worth c.€16Bn in 2028, doubling on average each year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In 2012, Forbes magazine called Spotify CEO Daniel Ek the most powerful person in the music business.

    “In 2012, Forbes magazine called Spotify CEO Daniel Ek”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Forbes

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In streaming, metadata appears as the object of transactions and comes with caveats including data identification, encryption, standards, and interoperability.

    “In the context of streaming, metadata appears as the object of transactions.It comes with several caveats -data identification, encryption, standards, and interoperability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Less established artists will have difficulties to succeed only through streaming, and this model may not be a sustainable career path for them.

    “-the less established artists will have difficulties to succeed only through streaming, and this model may not be a sustainable career path for them;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If properly embraced by the industry, the UK metadata code will move things in the right direction.

    “However, if properly embraced by the industry, it will move things in the right direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The diminishment of the physical aspect of music has contributed to the perception of music by many as a disposable commodity rather than an art form.

    “This has contributed to the perception of music by many as a disposable commodity rather than an art form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ramesh 2024 found that the top 1% of artists accounted for 78% of all streams and 83% of streaming revenue in 2023.

    “Empirical research by Ramesh published in 2024 found that: -the top 1% of artists accounted for 78% of all streams and 83% of streaming revenue in 2023.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ramesh 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    100% AI-generated music is already streamed on DSPs, and Spotify's catalogue now includes AI-generated music created and uploaded by third parties.

    “100% AI-generated music is already streamed on DSPs.Spotify's catalogue now includes AI-generated music created and uploaded by third parties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The importance of publishing rights has increased because publishers take a much more active role in tracking and monetizing streams for which copyright remuneration is due.

    “-the importance of publishing rights has increased because publishers take a much more active role in tracking and monetizing streams for which copyright remuneration is due;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Artificial intelligence will play a bigger role in music recommendations, and based on listening habits, AI-driven algorithms will make music discovery more personalized than before.

    “-Artificial intelligence (AI) will play a bigger role in music recommendations.Based on listening habits, AI-driven algorithms will make music discovery more personalized than before.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Algorithmic curatorship can be considered a control mechanism that is computationally objective and at the same time over-subjectivizes consumption.

    “Algorithmic curatorship could also be considered as a control mechanism: it is computationally objective, and at the same time, it over-subjectivizes consumption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Playlists and algorithms play an important role in music streaming.

    “Playlists and algorithms play an important role in music streaming.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Playlists promote the notion that music is something to listen to tangentially and not with complete attention, making music synonymous with superfluous.

    “First, the playlists promote the notion that music is something to listen to tangentially and not with complete attention, something light that cannot be very demanding, so music becomes synonymous with superfluous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The expected impact of generative AI in the mid-term is a moderate penetration rate in volume and value on streaming platforms, and high potential cannibalization of revenue and loss of music creators' streaming revenues to DSPs.

    “The expected impact in the mid-term perspective is a moderate penetration rate in volume and value on streaming platforms, and high potential cannibalization of revenue and loss of music creators' streaming revenues to DSPs (CISAC and PMP, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CISAC and PMP, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Music is becoming a background and losing its important social and cultural functions.

    “i.e., music is becoming a background and losing its important social and cultural functions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eriksson et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Traditionally albums offered a unified listening experience beyond individual songs, but this is no longer the case, which can be attributed at least partly to streaming.

    “Traditionally albums offered a unified listening experience that goes beyond individual songs.Unfortunately, this is no longer the case, which, at least to some extent, can be attributed to streaming.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Ramesh considers this concentration more pronounced than in the pre-streaming era.

    “He considers this concentration more pronounced than in the pre-streaming era (Ramesh 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ramesh 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Platforms and DSPs have gained from economy of scale, reduction of costs, and new markets.

    “The platforms and DSPs have gained from the economy of scale, reduction of costs, and new markets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The 2023 DCMS research found that evidence proving or disproving whether streaming algorithms embed, amplify, or introduce unfair biases is mixed and at times inconclusive.

    “The 2023 DCMS research into the impact of streaming services' algorithms on music consumption found that evidence proving or disproving whether these technologies embed, amplify, or introduce unfair biases is mixed and, at times, inconclusive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DCMS report 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    As streaming services operate worldwide, they must comply with different laws and regulations in each country, which can complicate how royalties are distributed.

    “Negative -As streaming services operate worldwide, they must comply with different laws and regulations in each country.This can complicate how royalties are distributed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In the digital age, the abundance of creative content creates a huge oversupply, accompanied by short-form social media content, leading to much shorter life cycles for music and shorter attention spans.

    “In the digital age the abundance of creative content creates a huge oversupply.Music supply is everywhere, accompanied by short-form social media content.This leads to much shorter life cycles for music and listeners have shorter attention spans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Gen AI platforms are disrupting the distribution system as they offer prompter users the chance to directly distribute their creations on Spotify.

    “Gen AI platforms are disrupting the distribution system as they offer prompter users the chance to directly distribute their creations on Spotify.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The search for optimal solutions will continue and will require finding new legal and business models for revenue sharing.

    “The search for optimal solutions will continue and will require finding new legal and business models for revenue sharing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Solutions developed in the domain of music streaming may have implications beyond the music industry, potentially informing approaches to fair compensation and sustainable creative ecosystems in other sectors of the digital content economy.

    “Therefore, the solutions that may be developed in this domain may have implications beyond the music industry, potentially informing approaches to fair compensation and sustainable creative ecosystems in other sectors of the digital content economy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Streaming has affected the significance of broadcasting and radio, where the recording and publishing sides used to receive an equal share, to the overall detriment of composers and songwriters.

    “-Streaming has also affected the significance of broadcasting and radio, where the recording and publishing sides used to receive an equal share, to the overall detriment of composers and songwriters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    New intermediaries have appeared, offering services to artists including playlist promotion and various optimizations based on technology tools.

    “-new intermediaries have appeared, offering services to artists, incl.playlist promotion, and various optimizations based on technology tools;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Data-driven decision-making influences decisions about an artist's image, branding, and the type of music they create, and artists feel more pressure to conform to what data suggests is popular rather than following creative instincts.

    “This approach influences decisions about an artist's image, branding, and the type of music they create.Artists feel more pressure to conform to what the data suggests is popular rather than following their creative instincts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gantchev 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The dominance of streaming has significantly affected the structure and dynamics of the music industry.

    “The dominance of streaming has significantly affected the structure and dynamics of the music industry.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The third conclusion is that there are issues that have not yet found adequate solutions.

    “The third conclusion that can be made is that there are issues that have not yet found adequate solutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The artist-centric model seeks to favor professional artists and could potentially bring benefits to lesser-known artists to get exposure to large audiences on streaming platforms.

    “The artist-centric model seeks to favor professional artists (Moreau 2024) and could potentially bring benefits to lesserknown artists to get exposure to large audiences on streaming platforms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moreau 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The statement that Daniel Ek is the most powerful person in the music business is not true; it is the majors who control the industry, including Spotify.

    “This statement shows the media perception of streaming, however, it is not true -it is the majors who control the industry, including Spotify.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    AI-generated tracks are circulating on streaming platforms, are in suggested playlists, and some generate substantial streams.

    “AI-generated tracks are circulating on streaming platforms, they are in suggested playlists, and some generate substantial streams.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The shift to streaming has reshaped the economics of the music industry, creating new opportunities, revolutionizing the market, expanding access to music, and revitalizing overall industry revenues while addressing some issues associated with music piracy.

    “The shift to streaming has reshaped the economics of the music industry.It has created new opportunities, revolutionized the market, expanded access to music, and revitalized overall industry revenues while addressing some of the issues associated with music piracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because non-compliance with the UK Voluntary Code would not constitute a breach of legislation or relevant contracts, the impact of the new Code is uncertain.

    “However, given that non-compliance would not constitute a breach of legislation or relevant contracts, the impact of the new Code is uncertain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Streaming has changed, to some extent, the perception of music and its social and cultural value and given consumption a much higher role as a factor in music generation.

    “Streaming has changed, to some extent, the perception of music and its social and cultural value and given consumption a much higher role as a factor in music generation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Boomy is a platform allowing the creation of AI-generated music to be uploaded on DSPs.

    “Boomy is a platform allowing the creation of AI-generated music to be uploaded on DSPs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The economics of music streaming is part of the broader debate on value creation and distribution in the digital economy.

    “The economics of music streaming is part of the broader debate on value creation and distribution in the digital economy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IFPI report shows strong growth in developing and emerging markets, with countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America seeing a rise in streaming service adoption.

    “IFPI report shows strong growth in developing and emerging markets.Countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America are seeing a rise in streaming service adoption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IFPI report

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Streaming enables users to choose to listen to specific tracks, and the micro-payments generated by each stream devalue the music itself because people would not appreciate the album as a concept.

    “Fourth, streaming enables users to choose to listen to specific tracks.Even if this is monetized, the micro-payments generated by each stream are, in a way, devaluing the music itself because people would not appreciate the album as a concept.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In comparison, 55% goes to the recording side/neighboring rights (42.4% to labels and 12.7% to performers), and streaming services retain 30% of the subscription fees.

    “In comparison, 55% goes to the recording side/ neighboring rights (42.4% to labels and 12.7% to performers), and streaming services retain 30% of the subscription fees (GEMA 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites GEMA 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Spotify and other platforms outsource the task of analyzing each song to Echo Nest, which is currently owned by Spotify.

    “Spotify and other platforms outsource the task of analyzing each song to the Echo Nest company (currently owned by Spotify).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Generative AI represents a potential opportunity for DSPs to generate royalty-free tracks and integrate them into their playlists, which could significantly boost their margins by drastically reducing copyright costs.

    “Generative AI represents a potential opportunity for DSPs to generate royaltyfree tracks and integrate them into their playlists.This could significantly boost their margins by drastically reducing copyright costs (Gantchev 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gantchev 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the majors removed their catalogs from the platforms, the platforms would no longer attract the general public.

    “If the majors removed their catalogs from the platforms, they would no longer attract the general public.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Streaming has provided global access to artists, but this happens in the context of a much stronger global competition, which puts pressure on local and smaller markets.

    “-streaming has provided global access to artists but this happens in the context of a much stronger global competition, which again puts pressure on local and smaller markets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    With the advance of technology, music streaming will seek to improve sound quality and listening experiences.

    “-With the advance of technology, music streaming will seek to improve sound quality and listening experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If streaming alone cannot support a broad range of professional musicians, it may lead to a music ecosystem dominated by superstars and part-time creators, potentially limiting the diversity and quality of musical output.

    “If streaming alone cannot support a broad range of professional musicians, it may lead to a music ecosystem dominated by superstars and part-time creators, potentially limiting the diversity and quality of musical output.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Streaming has a much broader impact than just delivering more music in a more convenient way to users; this technology-driven business model has a wider impact on society and its welfare.

    “Streaming has a much broader impact than just delivering more music in a more convenient way to users.This technology-driven business model has a wider impact on society and its welfare.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CMA found that the split in streaming revenues between songwriters and publishers may be sub-optimal, particularly for songwriters, due to challenges in negotiating increases, but determined that competition policy is not the right tool to reach an optimal split.

    “The CMA similarly found that the split in streaming revenues between songwriters and publishers may be sub-optimal, particularly for songwriters, due to challenges in negotiating increases, but determined that competition policy is not the right tool to reach an optimal split (CMA 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CMA 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Streaming has a global outreach, which means streamers with global coverage ambitions will need to invest in content delivery network solutions to minimize latency and maintain quality of experience.

    “-Content Delivery: streaming has a global outreach which means that the streamers with global coverage ambitions will need to invest in content delivery network solutions to minimize latency and maintain the quality of the experience;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This shapes the cultural offering and puts it into a framework that is not conducive to diversity and innovation.

    “This shapes the cultural offering and puts it into a framework that is not conducive to diversity and innovation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In music streaming, the software makes profiles of each song and the algorithm recommends to the user songs close to that profile.

    “In the case of music streaming, the software makes profiles of each song and then the algorithm, based on that information, makes recommendations to the user that come close to that profile.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A French National Music Centre study showed that today, 30% of intensive streaming listeners generate 70% of total streams and therefore dictate where 70% of the money goes.

    “A French National Music Centre study showed that today, 30% of intensive streaming listeners generate 70% of total streams and, therefore, dictate where 70% of the money goes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A Gen AI boost is expected in the music streaming segment due to new usage and functionalities that traditional or new players will monetize.

    “A Gen AI boost is expected in the music streaming segment due to new usage and functionalities that traditional or new players will monetize”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    90% of the artists in the survey reported that streaming accounted for over 50% of their music-related income, up from 30% five years ago.

    “-90% of the artists in this survey reported that streaming accounted for over 50% of their music-related income, up from 30% five years ago.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ramesh 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Factors such as artificial intelligence, the extent of collaboration within the industry and between industry and different rightsholder groups, and the music markets' maturity will influence this process.

    “Such factors as artificial intelligence, the extent of collaboration within the industry and between industry and different rightsholder groups, and the music markets' maturity will influence this process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Artists strive to maintain a strong social media presence to engage with fans and promote their music, maintaining an image that blurs public personal and private life, and the consumer feels a direct connection with the artist which stimulates further demand.

    “Artists strive to maintain a strong social media presence to engage with fans and promote their music.They maintain a certain image, blurring the lines between public personal and private life.The consumer feels a direct connection with the artist which stimulates further demand.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This lack of transparency poses questions regarding discoverability and cultural diversity.

    “This lack of transparency poses questions regarding discoverability and cultural diversity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The impact of AI-generated tracks in terms of volume of tracks and streams has yet to be quantified.

    “The impact of this phenomenon, in terms of the volume of tracks and streams, has yet to be quantified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of transparency, revenue distribution, and consumption patterns have changed the flow of revenue streams, raising questions about sustainability of music careers, particularly for mid-tier and emerging artists.

    “The lack of transparency, revenue distribution, and consumption patterns have changed the flow of the revenue streams.This has raised questions about the sustainability of music careers, particularly for mid-tier and emerging artists.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CISAC sees the potential of high cannibalization rates and replacement of human-produced production music for B2B use.

    “Here, CISAC sees the potential of high cannibalization rates and replacement of human-produced”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CISAC

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Streaming platforms started as music companies but were all technology companies, and nowadays portray themselves as media companies.

    “Streaming platforms reportedly started as music companies.But they were all technology companies, and nowadays, they portray themselves as media companies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While streaming platforms have more control over traditional stakeholders including consumers, this relationship is not straightforward.

    “While streaming platforms have more control over the traditional stakeholders in music, incl.the consumers, this relationship is not straightforward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Twelve trade associations, membership organizations, and collecting societies have signed the UK Voluntary Code on behalf of their members.

    “Twelve trade associations, membership organizations, and collecting societies have signed on behalf of their members (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/uk-vol-untary-code-of-good-practice-on-transparency-in-music-streaming).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites https://www.gov.uk/guidance/uk-vol-untary-code-of-good-practice-on-transparency-in-music-streaming

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The emphasis on playlist-friendly, algorithm-optimized music could lead to a homogenization of musical styles and loss of diversity.

    “-The emphasis on playlist-friendly, algorithm-optimized music could lead to a homogenization of musical styles and loss of diversity;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Streaming numbers have become a measure of success, leading to a new culture where artists are judged by their play counts, which reduces overall artistic expression, creativity, and human aspects of music-making.

    “Streaming numbers have now become a measure of success.This leads to a new culture where artists are judged by their play counts.This reduces the overall artistic expression, creativity, and human aspects of the music-making process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The average per-stream rate across major platforms was $0.004 with considerable variations.

    “The average per-stream rate across major platforms was $0.004 with considerable variations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ramesh 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The second impact is that streaming has significantly affected the traditional music distribution model.

    “The second impact is that streaming has significantly affected the traditional music distribution model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Demand and compensation depend on factors such as placement of music on playlists, platform-generated algorithmic recommendations, popularity of genres, frequency of releases, and status of the artist.

    “Demand and compensation also depend on such factors as: -the placement of the music on playlists, -platform generated algorithmic recommendations, -the popularity of different genres, -frequency of releases by the artist, -the status of the artist -associated with label or independent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Most artists have not been able to capitalize on the new possibilities and have made limited use of the streaming business model.

    “Meanwhile, most of the artists have not been able to capitalize on the new possibilities and have made limited use of the streaming business model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Record labels have a much smaller role in distribution and are adopting new non-traditional roles including data analytics and playlist promotion.

    “-record labels have a much smaller role in the distribution, and to adapt, they are adopting new non-traditional roles incl.data analytics, and playlist promotion;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While cloud hosting liberates companies from maintaining their own infrastructure, it is not necessarily cheap.

    “while cloud hosting liberates companies from the need to maintain their own infrastructure, it's not necessarily cheap.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For songwriters, the current metadata gap may result in significant delays to payment, or no payment at all.

    “For songwriters, it may result in significant delays to payment, or no payment at all.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Currently the data provided with the ISWC on new recordings does not identify songwriter and publishers.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Streaming has enabled direct relationships and sales between artists and fans, and some artists have monetized their creativity directly to fans, bypassing traditional industry gatekeepers.

    “-streaming has enabled direct relationships and sales between artists and fans, and some artists have monetized their creativity directly to fans, bypassing traditional industry gatekeepers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The categorization of music on streaming platforms is automated and not done by humans.

    “The categorization of the music is not done by humans and is automated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Consumption on streaming platforms is governed by data-driven decision-making, and data analytics is the main source for understanding consumer behavior.

    “Third, the consumption is governed by data-driven decision-making.Data analytics is the main source for understanding consumer behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When choosing server configurations, streamers might need to overestimate their demand in order to deal with unanticipated spikes in access to certain tracks or albums.

    “When choosing their server configurations, streamers might need to overestimate their demand in order to deal with unanticipated spikes in access to certain tracks or albums;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Based on streaming analytics, the speed of change on chart positions puts even more pressure on creators.

    “Moreover, based on streaming analytics, the speed of change on the chart positions puts even more pressure on creators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without this information, rights management cannot be effective.

    “Without this information rights management cannot be effective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The UK Voluntary Code addresses licensing models, usage data processing, and reporting royalties while maintaining legal constraints related to confidentiality, data privacy, and competition laws.

    “The code addresses the complexity of licensing models, usage data processing, and reporting royalties while maintaining legal constraints related to confidentiality, data privacy, and competition laws.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
121 of 121
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Streaming services do not pay artists directly; they pay rights holders such as record labels, publishers, and collecting societies, which then distribute royalties to artists based on contracts and the royalty distribution scheme in place.

    “However, streaming services do not pay artists directly.Instead, they pay rights holders such as record labels, publishers, and collecting societies.These entities then distribute the royalties to artists based on their contracts and the royalty distribution scheme in place.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The consumer time budget is limited to 24 hours a day and cannot be increased.

    “There are only 24 hours a day, and this cannot be increased.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A balanced copyright framework can address the interests of the various stakeholders in music.

    “A key element in this policy remains the balanced copyright framework, which needs to address the interests of the various stakeholders in music.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The platform uses music to profile its users and sell them as data to third parties.

    “It is reasonable to assume that the platform uses music to profile its users and sell them as data to third parties.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Algorithms used by streaming operators are based on individual listening habits.

    “The algorithms used by streaming operators are based on individual listening habits.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Currently the data provided with the ISWC on new recordings does not identify songwriter and publishers.

    “Currently the data provided with the ISWC on with new recordings does not identify songwriter and publishers (other identifiers will need to be applied to get this information).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Within streaming platforms, playlists have become the main vehicle for song consumption and represent the bulk of streaming music consumption.

    “Within streaming platforms, playlists have become the main vehicle for song consumption and represent the bulk of streaming music consumption.”
7 of 7

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. BRYNJOLFSSON, E. et al. 2018. National Bureau for Economic Re- search. Working paper series, Using Massive Online Choice experi- ments to measure changes in well-being, Washington. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1815663116. · DOI
  2. ERIKSSON, M.; FLESCHER, R.; JOHANSSON, SNICKARS, P., 2019. Spotify Teardown: Inside the Black Box of Streaming Music. MIT Press, ISBN-13978-0262038904.
  3. GANTCHEV, D., 2024. Opportunities and Challenges to Music Per- formers in the Digital Environment. Collection from Scientific Con- ference of the Rights of Performers, p. 29, https://www.ceeol.com/ search/chapter-detail?id=1267612.
  4. GUPTA, E., 2024. The Economics of Music Streaming: Impact on Art- ist Compensation and Industry Structure in the Digital Era. Journal of Humanities, Music and Dance, vol. 04, No. 06, http://journal. hmjournals.com/index.php/JHMD.
  5. JENSEN, F.J, 2024. Rethinking royalties: alternative payment systems on music streaming platforms. Journal of Cultural Economics, pp. 1 -24. https://doi.org/10.55529/jhmd.46.1.8. KRUEGER, A. B. 2019. Rockonomics: A Backstage Tour of What the Music Industry Can Teach Us About Economics and Life. New York, ISBN-13978-1524763718. · DOI · Paper page
  6. LEID, Z., 2024. Music Modernization: How Spotify Saved the Music Industry and Nearly Killed the Musicians in the Process. Journal of Humanities, Music and Dance, 2024, № 46, pp. 1 -8. https://doi. org/10.55529/jhmd.46.1.8 . LI, Q., ZHANG H.G and HONG X.P., 2020. Knowledge structure of technology licensing based on co-keywords network: A review and future directions, International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pp. 154 -165. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2019.11.007 · DOI
  7. MOREAU, F., WIKSTROM, P., HAAMPLAND, O., JOHANNES- SEN, R., September 2024, Elsevier Information Economics and Policy, vol. 68: 101103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar- ticle/pii/S0167624524000258?via%3Dihub
  8. SINGER, H. & ROSENBLATT B., 2023. Key Changes: the ten times technology transformed the music industry. Oxford University Press, New York, New York 2023, ISBN 9780197656907.
  9. STRIJLEV, H., 2019. New business models for radio industry product distribution through digital technologies. Journal of Economic and Social Alternatives, vol. 1, pp. 32 -39, ISSN 1314 -6556.
  10. ZEHR, H., 2021. An Economic Analysis of the Effects of Streaming on the Music Industry in Response to Criticism from Taylor Swift. Major Themes in Economics, vol. 23, pp. 51 -63. https://scholar- works.uni.edu/mtie/vol23/iss1/5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gantchev, D.
Affiliations
University of National and World Economy (BG)
Corresponding author
Gantchev, Dimiter
Venue
Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika
Published
2025-02-02
Volume
33
Issue
1s
Pages
106-133
ISSN
  • 1310-0270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1314-8575
OpenAlex
W4408204338
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Copyright and Intellectual Property
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Legal Systems and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
Keywords
music streaming, music industry economics, revenue distribution, transparency, metadata, music consumption, stakeholder interests, sustainable growth model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review