Does Training Improve the Business Performance of Small-Scale Entrepreneurs?: An Evaluative Study
Abstract
In surveys conducted in different countries over four years, the authors investigated why entrepreneurs in the same sector and during the same period were not equally successful. From the findings of this research they developed a new three-day training programme to address primarily skills and techniques relating to personal initiative, planning, goal setting and innovation. The training programme follows the ‘action learning’ approach, which links learning to activity, and is based on the assumption that competencies and behavioural patterns can be learned. A sample of 84 entrepreneurs was selected in South Africa. In the first stage (T1), before the start of the training, a standardized interview was conducted. The sample was then split into two groups: the ‘experimental’ group, which participated in the training (T2) and the ‘control’ group (no training). After six months (T3) the results of the training group were compared with those of the control group through the use of behavioural measures. The results at this stage showed that members of the training group had made significantly better progress in their business performance than members of the control group.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Time frames in (quasi) experimental studies evaluating outcomes of entrepreneurship education range between 11 weeks and 1 year.
“As a matter of fact, time frames in these studies range between 11 weeks and 1 year (DeTienne & Chandler, 2004;Friedrich, Glaub, Gramberg, & Frese, 2006;von Graevenitz et al., 2010;Oosterbeek et al., 2010;Peterman & Kennedy, 2003;Souitaris et al., 2007).”
From Putting Entrepreneurship Education Where the Intention to Act Lies: An Investigation Into the Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Behavior (2015) · cites this paper as Friedrich, Glaub, Gramberg, & Frese, 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Friedrich, C., Glaub, M., Gramberg, K., & Frese, M.
- ORCID
- Friedrich, Christian
- Venue
- Industry and Higher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-84
- ISSN
- 0950-4222 (ISSN-L)
- 2043-6858
- OpenAlex
- W2025393025
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industry and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Keywords
- entrepreneur training, small business, firm performance, action learning, personal initiative, goal setting, innovation, business planning, entrepreneurial skills, behavior change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review