Cited by 37Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesVocational and Entrepreneurial EducationHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

Does Training Improve the Business Performance of Small-Scale Entrepreneurs?: An Evaluative Study

Friedrich, Christian, Glaub, Matthias, Gramberg, Kristina, Frese, Michael·2006·Industry and Higher Education

Abstract

In surveys conducted in different countries over four years, the authors investigated why entrepreneurs in the same sector and during the same period were not equally successful. From the findings of this research they developed a new three-day training programme to address primarily skills and techniques relating to personal initiative, planning, goal setting and innovation. The training programme follows the ‘action learning’ approach, which links learning to activity, and is based on the assumption that competencies and behavioural patterns can be learned. A sample of 84 entrepreneurs was selected in South Africa. In the first stage (T1), before the start of the training, a standardized interview was conducted. The sample was then split into two groups: the ‘experimental’ group, which participated in the training (T2) and the ‘control’ group (no training). After six months (T3) the results of the training group were compared with those of the control group through the use of behavioural measures. The results at this stage showed that members of the training group had made significantly better progress in their business performance than members of the control group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5367/000000006777699847

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 37

Authors
Friedrich, C., Glaub, M., Gramberg, K., & Frese, M.
Venue
Industry and Higher Education
Published
2006-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
75-84
ISSN
  • 0950-4222 (ISSN-L)
  • 2043-6858
OpenAlex
W2025393025
Cited by
37
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industry and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords
entrepreneur training, small business, firm performance, action learning, personal initiative, goal setting, innovation, business planning, entrepreneurial skills, behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review